Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Your FCC At Work...In the most bizarre example yet of GOP corporate welfare, FCC Chairman...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 12:49 PM
Original message
Your FCC At Work...In the most bizarre example yet of GOP corporate welfare, FCC Chairman...
Marty Kaplan| BIO

Your FCC At Work

Posted November 13, 2007 | 10:31 AM (EST)

In the most bizarre example yet of GOP corporate welfare, FCC Chairman Kevin Martin has taken to the op-ed page of the New York Times to propose that -- in order to save the newspaper industry -- big-city papers should now be permitted to purchase a television or radio station in their market.

His rationale is breathtaking. To appreciate it, you first have to set aside some inconvenient truths. Like the finding of one of the FCC's own studies of localism (a quality that the law mandates the FCC to encourage) -- a study suppressed because they didn't like the results -- that television stations with distant owners (like, say, corporations that own chains of newspapers) do a worse job at localism than locally-owned stations. Or the finding of another FCC study that radio-newspaper cross-ownership "is associated with significantly less news coverage" on the radio station. Or the analysis of the FCC's own data that shows that cross ownership leads to less total newsgathering in a market, because the other stations realize they can't compete on news, so they focus on sports, weather or something else, like freeway chases or celebrity crime. You also have to ignore the underlying economic facts of the newspaper industry, which totally undermine Chairman Martin's "endangered species" argument.

But just put all that out of your mind, and focus instead on the nub of his argument: the reason that newspapers should be allowed to own television or radio stations is that those broadcast outlets are cash cows. And just why are they so profitable? Chairman Martin doesn't connect these dots, but let's do it for him.

<…>

So let's put Chairman Martin's argument together.

The public has given away, for free, its airwaves, to stations that generally do a dreadful job covering politics in their news programming, but that reap big bucks from political candidates, who in turn get the billions they spend on political ads from the public, and now the public is being asked to cut the newspaper industry in on that extortion racket in order to save democracy.

Next thing you know, we'll be asked to give tax breaks to oil companies. Oh, wait.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Now.. Why do you suppose that the "liberal" NYT
would give him the oped page for this?. . . hmmm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. NYT has been shiling for BushInc for decades.
And it just gets worse. They play act their opposition and maintain some true anti-Bush voices just to give them a mask of credibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Dan Rather has been saying the corporate media NEEDED Bush to stay in office
to get the rules rigged for them.

Easy to do when you control how the public views campaigns because you control the editing rooms.

Anyone think Kerry's unusually bad press the last 4 years is normal?

Kerry Seeks to Reverse FCC's "Wrongheaded Vote"

Commission Decision May Violate Laws Protecting Small Businesses; Kerry to File Resolution of Disapproval

Monday, June 2, 2003

WASHINGTON - Senator John Kerry today announced plans to file a "Resolution of Disapproval" as a means to overturn today's decision by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to raise media ownership caps and loosen various media cross-ownership rules.

Kerry will soon introduce the resolution seeking to reverse this action under the Congressional Review Act and Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act on the grounds that the decision may violate the laws intended to protect America's small businesses and allow them an opportunity to compete.

As Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship, Kerry expressed concern that the FCC's decision will hurt localism, reduce diversity, and will allow media monopolies to flourish. This raises significant concerns about the potential negative impacts the decision will have on small businesses and their ability to compete in today's media marketplace.

In a statement released earlier today regarding the FCC's decision, Kerry said:

"Nothing is more important in a democracy than public access to debates and information, which lift up our discourse and give Americans an opportunity to make honest informed choices. Today's wrongheaded vote by the Republican members of the FCC to loosen media ownership rules shows a dangerous indifference to the consolidation of power in the hands of a few large entities rather than promoting diversity and independence at the local level. The FCC should do more than rubber stamp the business plans of narrow economic interests.

"Today's vote is a complete dereliction of duty. The Commissioners are well aware that these rules greatly influence the competitive structure of the industry and protect the public's access to multiple sources of information and media. It is the Commission's responsibility to ensure that the rules serve our national goals of diversity, competition, and localism in media. With today's vote, they shirked that responsibility and have dismissed any serious discussion about the impact of media consolidation on our own democracy."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. Kick! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. Ed Schultz just interviewed FCC Commissioner Edelstein:
They were discussing the FCC public meeting on media consolidation at Seattle last Friday. Edelstein said that Kevin Martin blew off the concerns of the ~750-1000 people there, and is aggressively pushing his proposal for consolidation as of today, come hell or high water. He's blitzing today's NY Times op-ed page as well.



FCC's Kevin Martin says, **screw you little people.** Who cares what YOU think?



FCC's Martin: Ownership Rule Changes Would Not Affect Radio

November 13, 2007


FCC Chairman Kevin Martin has announced his specific proposal for changes to the media cross-ownership rules, and doesn't see any need to alter radio ownership caps. In a statement, Martin proposes that the FCC conclude its review of the ownership rules and adopt his suggested changes.

Martin proposes the ban on newspaper-broadcast ownership be amended to allow a newspaper to own one TV station or one radio station, but only in the largest markets and under certain criteria.
Martin adds that the FCC should not make any other rule changes, including the cap on radio ownership.

The Chairman argues that the media marketplace has changed greatly since the cross-ownership ban was put into place, with more options for information and news available now, and newspaper circulation declining.

The entire proposal can be read http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278113A1.pdf">here in PDF format.

Martin also wrote an op-ed piece in today's New York Times, arguing in favor of his proposed ownership rule changes. That column can be read http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/13/opinion/13martin.html">here.




Here is the story about the meeting last Friday:



More Opposition To Ownership Rule Changes At Seattle Localism Hearing

November 12, 2007


The sixth and final FCC public hearing on localism and media consolidation was held in Seattle last Friday, with the majority of those in attendance urging the Commission not to relax ownership rules. According to the Seattle Post-Intelligencier, roughly 750 people attended the late evening hearing, which saw Washington state Gov. Christine Gregorie criticize the FCC for the last-minute announcement of the hearing. FCC Chairman Kevin Martin was also reportedly booed and interrupted by the crowd.

In his prepared statement, Commissioner Michael Copps said the bottom line on the debate over the ownership rules is that "we, the FCC, have no business granting still more privileges to Big Media until we have measures in place so we know broadcasters will uphold their bargain – the pledge they made to serve the public interest in return for using the people’s airwaves. And if they don’t uphold that bargain, you know what I think we should say? 'Good-bye license.'"

Commissioner Jonathan Adelstein also voiced his displeasure in the short lead-up to the hearing, saying, "I see your interests and community needs as the end goal in themselves. Unfortunately, judging from the way this hearing was arranged, it looks like the media conglomerates’ agenda is far ahead of yours at the FCC. If you see a proposal for more consolidation made quickly after this final hearing, you will know your input was dismissed."





We are dismissed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Thanks for the link. It seems it was a complete revolt:
Edited on Tue Nov-13-07 02:06 PM by ProSense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Because they want their money and access to the dictators. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC