Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judith Regan: News Corp (FOX ) Exec (Ailes?)Told Her Lie About Kerik Affair to Protect Giuliani!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 07:19 PM
Original message
Judith Regan: News Corp (FOX ) Exec (Ailes?)Told Her Lie About Kerik Affair to Protect Giuliani!
Edited on Tue Nov-13-07 08:13 PM by Dems Will Win

THIS STORY HAS LEGS

Ex-Publisher Says News Corp. Official Wanted Her to Lie to Protect Giuliani

By RUSS BUETTNER

Judith Regan, the book publisher who was fired by the News Corporation last year, asserts in a lawsuit filed today that a senior executive at the media conglomerate encouraged her to mislead federal investigators about her relationship with Bernard B. Kerik during his bid to become homeland security secretary in late 2004.

The lawsuit asserts that the News Corporation executive wanted to protect the presidential aspirations of former Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani
, Mr. Kerik’s mentor, who had appointed him New York City police commissioner and had recommended him for the federal post.

....

Ms. Regan had an affair with Mr. Kerik, who is married, beginning in the spring of 2001, when her imprint, Regan Books, began work on his memoir, “The Lost Son.” In December 2004, after the relationship had ended and shortly after Mr. Kerik’s homeland security nomination fell apart, newspapers reported that the two had carried on the affair at an apartment near Ground Zero that had been donated as a respite for rescue and recovery workers.

...

“Defendants were well aware that Regan had a personal relationship with Kerik,” the complaint says. “In fact, a senior executive in the News Corporation organization told Regan that he believed she had information about Kerik that, if disclosed, would harm Giuliani’s presidential campaign. This executive advised Regan to lie to, and to withhold information from, investigators concerning Kerik.

...

One of Ms. Regan’s lawyers, Brian C. Kerr of the firm Dreier L.L.P., said she possesses evidence to support her claim that she was advised to lie to federal investigators who were vetting Mr. Kerik. But Mr. Kerr declined to discuss the nature of the evidence.

“We’re fully confident that the evidence will show that Judith Regan was the victim of a vicious smear campaign engineered by News Corp. and HarperCollins,” Mr. Kerr said.


http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/13/nyregion/13cnd-regan.html?_r=1&hp=&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&adxnnlx=1194998782-oa5tjKtv/yR3fFP/OoWbVg&pagewanted=print


WAS THE EXECUTIVE ROGER AILES, RUDY'S FORMER CAMPAIGN ADVISOR? HOLY CRAP!!

Please recommend to get out the truth on Rudolph.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Guiliani - the corporate choice for POTUS...
K&R - know your shills!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Roger Ailes
Roger Ailes / Jossip

Fox News chief Roger Ailes was Rudy Giuliani’s media consultant for his first campaign for mayor in 1989. Giuliani performed Ailes’ wedding ceremony and, ...

http://www.jossip.com/category/roger-ailes/

Roody is a thug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. If it's Roger Ailes, then this is even huger! I can't wait to see who to she names.
Edited on Tue Nov-13-07 08:11 PM by Dems Will Win
Ailes is the most logical one, with all his close ties to Rudy!

This is getting longer and longer legs, and it's all about SEX! Damn!

:popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. OK, here's what could really hurt Giuliani and involve him in the Kerik case
forcing him to testify:

The Columbia Journalism Review reported that during New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani's first term "News Corp. received a $20.7 million tax break for the mid-Manhattan office building that houses the Post, Fox News Channel, TV Guide and other operations. During Giuliani's 1997 reelection campaign, News Corp. was also angling for hefty city tax breaks and other incentives to set up a new printing plant in New York City. Most dramatically, Giuliani jumped in to aggressively champion News Corp. when it battled Time Warner over a slot for the Fox News Channel on Time Warner's local cable system.

http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2004/07/b122948.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Here is the suit complaint part about Rudy:
Edited on Tue Nov-13-07 08:44 PM by Dems Will Win
1. This action arises from a deliberate smear campaign orchestrated by one of the
world’s largest media conglomerates for the sole purpose of destroying one woman’s credibility
and reputation. This smear campaign was necessary to advance News Corp.’s political agenda,
which has long centered on protecting Rudy Giuliani’s presidential ambitions.

2. It is now widely accepted that one of Giuliani’s major political vulnerabilities is his
association with Bernard Kerik, the former NYC Police Commissioner and member of Giuliani
Partners who was recently indicted on federal charges of tax fraud and corruption. Defendants
were well aware that Regan had a personal relationship with Kerik. In fact, a senior executive in
the News Corp. organization told Regan that he believed she had information about Kerik that, if
disclosed, would harm Giuliani’s presidential campaign. This executive advised Regan to lie to,
and to withhold information from, investigators concerning Kerik. Indeed, another News Corp.
executive similarly advised Regan not to produce clearly relevant documents in connection with
the government’s investigation of Kerik.
Thus, because of the damaging information that
defendants believed Regan possessed, defendants knew they would be protecting Giuliani if they
could preemptively discredit her.


http://www.portfolio.com/images/site/editorial/pdf/regancomplaint.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #16
37. And thank God it's about SEX. That's the only thing that seems to get a "rise"
pardon the pun, out of these uptight latter-day Puritans on the far-wrong. You know, the kind of folks who'd look the other way and vote for rudy because it'll mean at least four more years of bush-type morally-bankrupt, warmongering, thug-meets-goon policies (and politics). That's what they know and that's what they love. And hideous-looking, incredibly UNsexy, dirty-old-men like roger ailes and even murdoch and the whole slimy bunch of them love this salacious sex. Probably because they can't get any normal sex under normal circumstances. This is the only gratification they get. They also tend to like decorative bimbettes a lot - notice how so many of the women on Pox Noise (with the exception of greta von susteren - who went straight to the plastic surgeon's office upon getting the job and it still didn't make any difference) look like inflatable dolls? They're so obsessed that, as Keith Olbermann reported the other night, they've descended into putting smut on the air. A SINGLE LINE about Spring Break in Ft. Lauderdale in a voice/over report on the o'really show meant several minutes of "Girls Gone Wild"-type clips.

Remember, it was SEX that got everybody worked up about Clinton enough to get his impeachment rolling. That's all they could find that stuck - and it stuck because that's one thing in this uptight Puritanical society that is a sure-fire winner. Most of America is ferociously hung-up about sex - all kinds of sex. The more squalid the better.

Wouldn't surprise me if it eventually came out that Judy Regan was schtupping rudy (after all, he does have that typical track record of screwing around on one wife before dumping her for the woman he screwed around with). And since she was carrying on with kerik in that apartment ostensibly set aside for first responders to rest up and take a shower and catch their breath, rudy would have HAD to know about it because of his tight horny-boy brotherhood with bernie kerik. You KNOW they would have gossiped and traded notes about it, and bernie would have done a "just so you know, Judy and I are gonna use the apartment for a coupla hours" to tip him off. Probably also just to reserve the room for a couple of hours before rudy and judy nathan needed it. Wouldn't surprise me if she'd had rupert himself for a little while. He did give her A) her own publishing imprint; and B) her own prime time talk show when Pox Noise was just getting started and needed some "marquee" names to attract attention, and she was this "cute," snarky, cocky little smart-ass with lots of attitude, in tight-fitting skirted suits and pointy designer stilettos and a perky little behind, who photographed well and liked to stir things up (sort of a primordial michelle malkin). Big, fat, old, jowly, balding, ugly-but-rich-and-powerful Viagra-poppers LOVE that kind of gal. Makes their juices start stirring and makes THEM feel cute, snarky, cocky, and smart-ass, also. And gals like Judy who enjoy playing the high-roller tend to like old, fat, ugly farts with money and power because you hitch your wagon to guys like that and YOU get rich and famous, too. Just like Judy Regan did.

She had a GREAT thing going. For awhile. I mean, her very own publishing empire that rupert bought her! You KNEW she wasn't gonna go away quietly. :rofl: :party: :popcorn:

And BTW... notice her now. There are clips of her running on MSNBC and elsewhere, in which she looks like she didn't put her makeup on before she went on camera. Now, she has a fresh-scrubbed face like a little choir girl, and the carefully outlined and shellacked lipstick and heavy eye makeup are nothing but memories! It's the first time we've probably seen her facial skin in a relatively bare and unspackled form. And her hair is plain - looks like she did it herself as opposed to going to some high-priced, 5th Avenue courtesan-populated salon. Makes her look more innocent and plain and credible - lowers her floozy-quotient substantially. She doesn't look like she trafficked in sleazy sex or titillation or had serial flings with powerful, ugly, horny older men.

On another subject, this is probably THE KEY reason they hate Hillary so much. She's too smart, not opinionated the "right" way like someone such as Judy Regan is, and she's EXTREMELY un-fuckable. Hillary is NOT sexy by any stretch of the dirty-old-man imagination. In fact, she is probably extremely threatening to them because she probably reminds them of the too-smart-and-assertive-for-her-own-good first wives they threw over for the heavy-make-up, stiletto-heeled courtesans they brought in as replacements. Hillary's floozy quotient is the square root of negative-one level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. How does one express this in pot-and-kettle terms?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Double Whammy! Fox and Guiliani hurt by this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. How many wing nuts who were apoplectic over Monica's blow job...
...will turn a blind eye to the maritally unfaithful Rudy and his maritally unfaithful cronies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
28. exactly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. Off to the greatest page, this is fucking RICH!!!!!!!!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. He's a gangster, always has been, always will be.
Anyone looking for something different will come up empty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. ooohh lookit! "C. Kerr of the firm Dreier L.L.P., said she possesses evidence to support her claim"
oh yes please not be a ploy to make a settlement bigger, please let it be released.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bklyncowgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. Oh my, that picture of Rudy & Bernie --If both hadn't had well documented affairs with women....
Seriously, it looks like that was shot at NYC's Gay Pride Parade.

And Rockette Rudy...Precious, just precious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Yeah, and it looks like Rudy's goosing him
with his other hand.

:crazy: :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #13
30. No, Rudy's giving Bernie a reach-around
:hi:

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
10. In the immortal words of Howard Cosell...
Edited on Tue Nov-13-07 07:32 PM by speedoo
DOWN GOES KERIK!!!!

DOWN GOES RUDY!!!!

DOWN GOES FOX!!!!

K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
11. REC this shit up! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. I hope RUPERT gets his ass EXPOSED,...and burned!!!
That ruthless corporacrat has certainly EARNED confrontation!!

HEY, RUPPIE-DOLL,...HOPE YOU GET IT LIKE YOU GAVE IT,...without a thought to your existence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
14. How not credible is THIS story?
I don't think anyone "needs" to tell Judith Regan to lie; it comes as naturally to her as breathing. But she's filed a lawsuit, so she's apparently persuaded that she still has some shred of credibility to defend.

Color me shocked that Murdoch or Giuliani didn't try the simple expedient of buying her silence. I guess they didn't trust the power of money to keep her quiet. Which, in Rudy's world, leaves just one other way to make sure someone doesn't blab an inconvenient truth.

So, who do the Republicans turn to now? Fred? Hee, hee, hee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #14
35. DING DING DING! Gratuitous, you're our grand prize winner!
Edited on Wed Nov-14-07 02:23 PM by rocknation
I don't think anyone "needs" to tell Judith Regan to lie...But she's filed a lawsuit, so she's apparently persuaded that she still has some shred of credibility to defend...

But the real question is, DID she lie to the officials? If so, did she commit a crime? If she was encouraged by Fox News muckety-mucks to lie, did THEY commit a crime? What is she actually suing for, anyway? Hurt feelings? Wrongful termination?

:shrug:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
15. she REALLY REALLY REALLY hates Kerik. she has/had a show on Sirius, and
Edited on Tue Nov-13-07 07:47 PM by Gabi Hayes
I heard her talking about him one day, maybe a year ago.

I couldn't believe the stuff she was saying about him....total and complete loathing. he must've dumped her HARD.

it was a very enjoyable listen, and I'm certain whatever she felt then is fueling this lawsuit, which can only redound to the benefit of our country....seriously. I'm serious. that is, if anybody in the liberal media cares to do a little followup on this. not holding breath, of course.

too bad nobody wants to have her on TV anymore. funny how the Paula Joneses and Kathleen Willeys of the left never seem to get get much coverage.

and what, exactly, has happened to the coverage of Bernie's indictment? has there been ANY mention of it since Sunday, when it was very briefly glossed over.

the likes of Jake Tapper (see media matters for a story on how he let Rudy lie about his foreknowledge of Kerik's corruption, which led to him LYING to a grand jury) had the gall to say that america's mayor did a good job in in handling the indictment announcement, that it made him ''SEEM CANDID'' to the voting public. he really said that, as if 'seeming' candid is all that matter. Appearance, to that little monster, is all that matters, it would....seem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
19. This has the same ring to it as Emily and Scanlon in the Scanlon/ Abramoff outing.
Edited on Tue Nov-13-07 09:02 PM by caligirl
She was dumped by Scanlon( got to big an ego and went for another woman after they were engaged). Emily went to the feds with the goods on him and Abramoff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bklyncowgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. Hell knows no fury like a woman scorned
You'd think these guys would learn to let down their paramours gently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
20. Dan Abrams covering it now on MSNBC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Abrams just said it looks like she has audio tapes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. yes and lets hope she uses them in a public way instead of just trying to get Faux to pay up.
and a pox on all of them including her. On an episode of law and order ci they killed off a character that was Judith Reagan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. I was just thinking she needs some body guards
Maybe start cooking for herself every day. But she knows who she's been running with. I bet she knows a lot about a lot of people being in conservative circles so deep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. oh you know she does, i'm sure she even helped bury some of those bodies.
this is why i'm worried her having the tapes will just be used as leverage to make Murdoch just pay to make her go away. If she wanted to try and become a human and atone for the things she's done she should make the tapes public, i'm sure she's wealthy so maybe just walking away from the cash or better yet donating it to a good cause would be one helluva first step.

****i know**** never gonna happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
26. Regan "The Highest Functioning Deranged Person I've Ever Known"
Edited on Tue Nov-13-07 09:25 PM by loindelrio
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/arts/main.jhtml?xml=/arts/2005/04/11/ftreg11.xml&page=1

A former friend described her as "the highest functioning deranged person I've ever known", while a former employee remembered a woman who delighted in throwing together staff she knew had problems with each other. A former boyfriend told VF he had once told Regan that if she had been a man and behaved as she did, someone would have "knocked her teeth out".


Sounds like just the type to have kept evidence for future use.


When the enemy is destroying themselves, don't get in the way . . . just enjoy the moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. I won't be surprised if she "commited suicide".
She better have those tapes with an Attorney.
What if this case is picked up by Fed. Prosecutors & the Subpoena those tapes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
29. Judi Judi JUDI!1
So PIRRO recruited Bernie on the principle that it takes a philanderer to catch a philanderer? Plus, MSRNC just relayed this story, labelling Bernie as "9-11 HERO"!!!1 I've always wondered what exactly Bernie (and Rudy) did that was "heroic"!!!1

*******QUOTE*******

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/27/AR2006092701378.html

.... ...Pirro was overheard by authorities having a telephone conversation with former New York City Police Commissioner Bernie Kerik in the middle of last year. They said that Pirro suspected her husband, Albert Pirro, might be having an affair and that she and Kerik, a private security consultant, discussed possibly placing a recorder in a room to listen in on him.

The two people said that the recording device was never used and that a Kerik investigation turned up no firm evidence of an affair. Kerik's attorney declined to comment on the case.

Pirro said Kerik was a friend and confirmed that they had spoken about her marital concerns. ....

********UNQUOTE*******

So here's a fond look at what Bernie was doing on 9-11 (stepping out of the shower), and his blast from the past, Judith REGAN. A couple of her men (the last graphic being an abstract of LIMBOsevic, since she published the first (two?) of his books, ghost-written (the 1st, at least) by alleged assaulter John FUND):



*********QUOTE********

http://newyorkmetro.com/nymetro/news/media/columns/medialife/152/

.... Then Judith and Rupert found each other -- and ReganBooks was born. Not only did their commercial instincts mesh, but Judy's what's-the-world-ever-done-for-me politics were highly compatible with the Murdoch view.

And then the sex part. It's a one-woman show.

I have never heard anyone talk about sex the way Judy does. I have never heard anyone talk about their sexual partners the way Judy does. I have never heard anyone analyze individual motivations, the workings of the marketplace, and politics, too, in such precisely sexual terms. The other day, on her show, she kept interrupting her tempered guests on the subject of why women like Bill Clinton, and, voice rising, saying: "They want to have sex with him -- that's why they like him!"

Early in her career at Simon & Schuster, she published a book called The Rogue Warrior and fought tooth and nail for a full-face cover photo of the author. "Don't they understand?" she stormed to me. "Women will buy this because they want to fuck him!" She got the full face and a best-seller.

http://www.zianet.com/insightanalytical/newlow.htm (by DUer Gloria: )

Regan looked straight into the camera and for almost 10 minutes, delivered a pseudo stream-of-consciousness poetry riff mocking Clinton. Referring to his sad boyhood, she mocked his loneliness, then proclaimed that he built himself up and called himself KING, because "I am rich and I can do what I want!" She likened him to the cast out Socks, and envisioned him an old man meeting up with Socks at 125th street, both holding tin cups. ....

It was incredibly vicious. What was especially appalling was how she took the most painful aspects of Bill's background--his truly grievous childhood--and twisted them, using them to mock him. If this wasn't the "politics of personal destruction" I don't know how else you could describe this horrific display. ....

**********UNQUOTE***********

And I (the poster) will claim credit for insight. Back when KERIK's book for REGAN was debutting, she hosted him on her Faux interview show. His tale was of his missing mother, who inexplicably abandoned him as a tot. She never showed up for a custody hearing. The premise of the book was that this tough uber-male had this hole in his heart, thereby setting the pants on fire of tough wingnuts of all genders. As she probed him about the book, she and KERIK locked smouldering,WILD WINGNUT HOT gazes. Once the mother-thing was done, she moved on to his heroics (which were what?) on 9-11. She asked WHERE HE WAS when the planes hit. Without missing a WILD WINGNUT HOT eye-lock, he said, "Stepping out of the shower." She swallowed and held a long breath. The image of nekkid KERIK was plainly etched on the Faux camera lens during the LONG pause. He added, "In my office." Another LONG pause. He added, "After WORKING OUT." There was another swallow. I suspected BACK THEN that something was cooking between publisher and author, and it weren't spaghetti. Only 2 or 3 years later, when KERIK's many other past deeds floated to the surface like dead bodies did it become official that there was indeed WILD WINGNUT HOT LOVE between the two, that the two of them alternated their WILD WINGNUT HOT LOVE sessions with WORKING OUT together, that he had used NYPD to track down what happened to his mother, that he used NYPD to provide security for his personal WILD WINGNUT HOT LOVE sessions, that the WILD WINGNUT HOT LOVENEST was a city-paid apartment near the WTC intended as a rest site for rescue and recovery workers. The REGAN-KERIK Faux interview was pure musk in the air. Why don't Shrub's handlers hire some of US for intelligence work?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. I'm breaking into a sweat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #29
32. Stephanie Miller has been dropping hints yesterday and today
Miller said that she had lunch with Regan some time ago. Regan was very chatty and told her all sorts of things that Kerik and Rudy said to her. So this river may run to Rudy's door.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #32
38. What kind of hints?
Are there really tapes? Does she know when this will break big (as in, can't be ignored by even FOX)? I've been very patient waiting for the dirt on Rudy to come out and am still perfectly willing to wait until he secures the nomination. I just want to have enough popcorn ready.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #29
42. I do believe that this post is the
BEST ONE I've ever read!


don't you just LOVE Judith Regan?

can't wait for the tapes. hope she has copies/originals stored safely with someone, in the event of her sudden demise

a huge kudos to you for finding that stuff!

did you see my post above, in which I mentioned (not in the glorious detail you present) her Sirius radio show...she absolutely hates Kerik's guts, and that's putting it mildly. I sure hope the recording of that show makes out into the net. it was every bit as entertaining as your post.

as KO says, GREAT THANKS!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
33. I'd have more sympathy for Regan
If she had found her integrity for a lot less than $100 mill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #33
39. There are no heroes here
All whores and corruption up the wazoo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
34. K & R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benld74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
36. Why do they WAIT so EFFING long to do something about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. Good question.
This involves a civil suit that is politically charged, to say the least. Those who filed it have to do the background work to be sure that it isn't dismissed. This is a potentially explosive case, and the attorneys involved in it are primarily concerned with winning. The timing is certainly curious, though, as many people could benefit from it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. Key phrase: "as many people could benefit from it".
Yep. Kinda makes ya go "hmmmmm." I hear you.

:kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. If those tapes exist can a Fed. Prosecutor Subpoena them?
If so, this can spell real trouble for News Corp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. timing isn't curious at all: they just said on TV that the preliminary hearings
are RIGHT before one of the big primaries.

they know exactly what they're doing.

Regan is a genius marketeer, and one of the main components is TIMING

can you imagine the sort of dirt Kerik has on Rudy, starting out, as he did, as Rudy's DRIVER?????

why do you think an ignorant, lying crumbum like him got promoted so high, so far, so fast? can you imAGINE what would have happened if he'd really been examined by inquisitive dems during his Homeland Security nomination hearings? it's been said many times that there WAS no nanny problem...they just realized all the other dirt there was on Kerik. I'll bet my lunch that Rudy recommended him because Kerik THREATENED him, either implicitly, or explicitly. perhaps all he had to do back in the day was to 'suggest' what he'd like his next job to be, knowing full well that Rudy COULD NEVER, EVER deny him

Extortion/blackmail seems pretty obvious to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC