Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrats May Force All-Night Filibuster on Iraq Withdrawal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 04:21 PM
Original message
Democrats May Force All-Night Filibuster on Iraq Withdrawal
Democrats May Force All-Night Filibuster on Iraq Withdrawal

Posted by Steve Benen, The Carpetbagger Report at 12:00 PM on November 14, 2007.

Steve Benen: If that's the case, allow me to give the Democratic leadership some positive encouragement: this is a good idea.

This post, written by Steve Benen, originally appeared on The Carpetbagger Report


When a senator threatens a filibuster on a bill, the Senate holds a cloture vote to end debate. If the measure gets 60 votes, the full chamber votes on the legislation. If the cloture vote fails, which is far more common in an evenly divided Senate, the bill is pulled from the floor. No one actually has to talk the bill to death.

But when it comes to the latest fight over Iraq funding, Senate Dems are apparently considering a plan to force Republicans to follow through and literally filibuster.

Senate Democrats might force Republicans to wage a filibuster if the GOP wants to block the latest Iraq withdrawal bill, aides and senators said Tuesday.

That could set the stage for a dramatic end-of-the-year partisan showdown, which Democrats hope will help them turn voter frustration with Congress and the stalemate over Iraq into anger with the Republican Party.

Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (Ill.), the number two Democrat in the chamber, said a forced filibuster is "possible" and would "generate attention."

"We want to go to the bill, and have to decide initially whether they want us to go to the bill," Durbin said. "I wouldn't call it theatrics."


Well, I might call it a little theatrical, but that's not necessarily a criticism.

Depending on which polls you read, about two-thirds of the country wants to see Congress step and fight the Bush White House over ending the war in Iraq. Dems have tried to push various measures, even some with a few Republican allies, but when push comes to shove, they come up far short of the 60-vote requirement the GOP has established for meaningful legislation.

more...

http://alternet.org/blogs/peek/67905/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. DO IT
JUST DO IT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nike, baby! Just dooooooo it already.
Edited on Wed Nov-14-07 04:30 PM by wlucinda
Thankie for the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OrangeCountyDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. Window Dressing
Just another meaningless political stunt, like the last all night session they held.

ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS!!

If they really wanted to DO SOMETHING, they would have Mandatory Cloture Votes ALL EVENING LONG. The last time, they "SCHEDULED" the votes, and not only didn't have them in the late night hours, they notified the repubs exactly when they were going to happen, in advance.

I'd like to see them really suffer. I'd like to see them make it as uncomfortable on themselves as possible.

I won't hold my breath on that happening though. They'll just cave in later anyways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Almost sounds like what's being reported: political posturing.
Edited on Wed Nov-14-07 04:44 PM by sicksicksick_N_tired
I think they are being strategic by getting the fight into public view. They may not "win" but they will succeed in getting the pretzeldents repeated unwillingness to compromise or put limits on this country's investment before the American people.

On edit: I thought you were going to take a break from all this,...for your own well-being?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OrangeCountyDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Yeah, It's Frustrating
I definitely plan to cut back on following things though.

I guess realizing how Completely Fucked Up the whole process is, makes me want to :puke:!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. It would be a great, albeit safe, move by the Democrats IMHO.
This is one issue the Democrats KNOW they can win.

If they win on this one, maybe they can find the courage to actually pursue imposing the rule of law on these effers who have committed mass fraud upon the American people.

Damnit! Where is the courage to take a stand for the American people? Where is the courage to take a stand for the rule of law, for the Constitution, let alone common decency?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nealmhughes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. While all nighters in fillibusters are "theatrical" they are guaranteed audience grabbers!
It's about time for an oldfashioned "read the Bible from cover to cover" fillbuster or else just repeat the same lines over and over again: "This 'war' is turning into nothing but a long con, only thousands get killed in addition to merely getting fleeced."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
7. But, but wouldn't that involve a spine transplant? I'd certainly cheer on the process. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. THIS is what I've been looking for. MAKE them actually
filibuster. Make them get up there on CSPAN all night, getting hoarse, reading the goddam phone book! Let America SEE why this Congress has been thwarted across the board on "what they were elected to do"...

Make sure they do it LONG ENOUGH so that even Fox has to cover it. Make CNN MSNBC CBS ABC etc etc explain what they're seeing on the screen.

Who will they have up there? Will it be the bigwigs? Will Boehner be standing there, sweating in his shirtsleeves to KEEP THE TROOPS IN HARMS WAY?? Or will it be delegated to some younger thug, keeping the money away from the troops?... Keeping them from getting as much time at home with their families as they do on the front lines?

DOITDOITDOITDOT!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. Don't say "may," say "will," gang. Make 'em go crying to O'Reilly and Hannity.
Do it. Do it, do it, do it. Make it a casual day but do the people's work, please???!

Godd on ya, Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
10. anything's "possible", Dick.
Edited on Wed Nov-14-07 05:00 PM by MrCoffee
i won't lose any sleep over it.

and am i insane, or is the MAJORITY talking about a filibuster?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. no.. It's the majority forcing the minority to ACTUALLY
filibuster.. Rather than just counting the probable votes and going home. This is why it's so confounding to the public. It looks like Congress isn't even trying.

A lengthy televised filibuster will force the discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Any way you slice it though, Democrats need 60 votes to invoke cloture
Republicans only need 1 vote to defeat it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
13. Rec'd!~
Thank the Universe The People are with us on this.."fighting bush on ending War On Iraq."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
14. And then vote for more of the same the next morning.
We know how this is going to play out. A little theatrics to appease the left wing loons and then another round of funding for the continued military occupation of the middle eastern oil fields.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
15. Forcing a physical filibuster for only one night is theatrics.
I'm sorry, but that's the truth. The Senators will break out the cots, and we'll hear lots of speeches as they pull an all-nighter, but the result will be the same as a virtual filibuster - no cloture, bill blocked.

So, don't do it for just one night. If Reid had a spine, he'd not only force the filibuster, but he'd do what LBJ did for the Civil Rights Act and refuse to put any other business on the Senate Floor until the filibuster cracked. That would mean that the filibuster would go on for weeks, 24/7, no breaks. With frequent quorum calls so nobody gets to go home - they're all imprisoned in the Senate chamber for the duration. Reading from the phone book because even politicians run out of things to say after being forced to speechify for days straight.

That's how you crack the fuckers. That's real accomplishment.

One night on the floor is theatrics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Exactly! One Night my ass. . . keep it going until they all need showers
and the makeup is worn off, the women have removed the pantyhose and heels and the men all have fuzzy chins and look like the derelicts they are. . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
16. um. whatever happened to the "gang of fourteen" and keeping the powder dry?
no, I'm being serious. I thought they MUTUALLY agreed to not filibuster on both sides of the aisle.

whatever happened to that agreement? was it null and void once the majority changed?

does this mean the agreement was worthless in the beginning, nonbinding?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
17. They need to make the Repubs actually filibuster EVERY time they threaten to.
Stop rolling over and handing them a double victory, dammit!

If they wanna use the filibuster as a threat, MAKE THEM WORK FOR IT!
And let the public watch them OBSTRUCTING the will of the people, too.

If they actually had to follow through on every filibuster threat,
they'd stop making them pretty quickly. They aren't exactly POPULAR
these days, and if the public saw them clogging up the Senate by
filibustering every other bill, they know damn well it would hurt
them at the polls.

They wouldn't keep it up for long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. My point exactly! If they keep it up long enough. The entire American
populous will understand just who's screwing up here. Keep it going BEYOND the RW echo chamber's ability to spin it.... Don't stop until EVERYONE knows exactly who's zooming who!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC