Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Our bittersweet 16 - By Anita F. Hill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 08:49 AM
Original message
Our bittersweet 16 - By Anita F. Hill
Our bittersweet 16
By Anita F. Hill
November 19, 2007

WITHIN DAYS of my testimony in Clarence Thomas's Supreme Court confirmation hearing, my office was flooded with them. Dear Professor Hill, "I screamed at the television set." "I sobbed throughout." "I was mesmerized." "I am still seething." Though often expressed in raw and emotional terms, the letters offer incredibly thoughtful commentary on the hearing and the issues and people involved. Today, as I reread them, each in its own way begs the question: Have things really improved since October 1991?

I never stop hearing from people about the hearings. Last month, when Thomas published his memoir, nearly 600 e-mails came within two days time. I have about 25,000 letters, cards, handwritten notes on bits of paper passed through crowds and, lately, e-mail messages. In them, my testimony is complimented by some and intensely condemned by others. Though certain sentiments recur, there is no typical letter. Each tells a unique and personal story and some are laugh-out-loud funny. Whenever I think I've read enough, a letter, like the one I received recently from a 95-year-old veteran, reminds me of the importance of each message and encourages me to keep reading.

Like present-day blogs, the letters show the gulf between public discourse and private perceptions and experiences. On Oct. 12, 1991, the headline from the Washington Times read: "He said, she said: Thomas and Hill state their cases." In the privacy of their homes, individuals saw chaos and a firestorm, not the ordered search for truth the paper coolly described.

As the hearing opened, the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, Joseph Biden, declared: "This is not a hearing about the extent and nature of sexual harassment in America." It is convened "to air specific allegations against one specific individual." Yet, from day one, for many women and men, the hearing was a test of whether elected public officials understood not just my experience but the experiences of working women throughout the country.

more at:
http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2007/11/19/our_bittersweet_16/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. beautifully written.
I wonder what Anita Hill thinks of Joe Biden today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. That show guised as a hearing was absolutely surreal
yet, my memories of Prof. Hill remaining calm in that storm is imprinted in my memory forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I will NEVER forgive Joe Biden for throwing Anita Hill under the bus.
And delivering to the nation Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yep, Joe can kiss my ass forever for that.
And don't forget Snarlin' Arlen either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 03:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC