|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
reprehensor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 01:39 PM Original message |
Baltimore Sun: "Here Come the Thought Police" - Re: Harman & HR 1955 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 01:44 PM Response to Original message |
1. Does anyone know who cast the 6 Congressional "Nay" votes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reprehensor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 01:51 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Roll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 03:46 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. how utterly depressing. Conyers, DeFazio, Sanders, et. al. all swallowed this piece of shit? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KamaAina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 04:12 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Sanders is in the Senate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 04:25 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. oops. that's right. thanx. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KamaAina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 04:28 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Paul missed the vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sss1977 (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 04:07 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. as Kucinich said at the most recent debate... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 06:05 PM Response to Reply #7 |
27. That was one of his best lines that night. It had staying power, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 07:25 PM Response to Reply #7 |
44. And who read the Patriot Act! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacetalksforall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 01:56 PM Response to Original message |
3. I remember reading about Republicans 'targeting' California - desiring |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Art_from_Ark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 09:52 PM Response to Reply #3 |
48. Arnold did what he was installed to do: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crikkett (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-20-07 06:57 AM Response to Reply #3 |
53. Arnold has to play the moderate because he wants to be a senator I think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeSwiss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 03:18 PM Response to Original message |
4. Further into the article.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 04:27 PM Response to Reply #4 |
12. "threatened" use of force .. as in impeachment or anti-war protests. grim. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
6. just as a matter of curiousity, where were these two reporters when the rethugs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
9. I thought this was a pretty good bill addressing hatred towards identifiable people, not government. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 04:31 PM Response to Reply #9 |
16. Deleted message |
sicksicksick_N_tired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 04:36 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. What the hell? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trillo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 04:34 PM Response to Reply #9 |
17. The bill doesn't define "force" in the logically exclusive phrase "force or violence" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 04:39 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trillo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 04:53 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. How can the intent be clear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 05:17 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. HATE CRIMES HAVE INCREASED!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trillo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 04:23 PM Response to Original message |
10. It's about crushing political dissent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 04:30 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. exactly. the wording is so vague it could easily be interpreted that way by anyone, but .. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 04:47 PM Response to Reply #10 |
21. It was proffered by those interested in protecting people from HATE. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Didereaux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
14. posted this on the Globe site...for all the good that will do! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 04:45 PM Response to Original message |
20. Terra, terra, terra |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 05:42 PM Response to Original message |
24. This bill is intended to PROTECT OTHERS FROM HATRED. The paranoia over it,... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 05:47 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Wrong. It's to protect the Halliburton crowd from prosecution for treason. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 06:10 PM Response to Reply #25 |
29. And that's just ONE skeleton they'd rather keep in the closet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 06:43 PM Response to Reply #25 |
32. OHHHH!!! THIS BILL IS INTENDED TO PROTECT HALLIBURTON!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 06:49 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Wait til they roll out the actual laws |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 07:00 PM Response to Reply #33 |
37. When a bill intended to PROTECT THE PEOPLE is ATTACKED,... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 07:05 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. It will only protect the "people" committing the worst atrocities since WWII. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 07:23 PM Response to Reply #39 |
43. AHHHH!!! WWII. Another faux assertion. AGAIN. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Squatch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 06:50 PM Response to Reply #24 |
34. Won't somebody PLEASE think of the children? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-20-07 09:18 AM Response to Reply #24 |
57. Yep...The Center for Constitutional Rights is a well-know RW seed org... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hydra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 06:04 PM Response to Original message |
26. This part scares me: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 06:08 PM Response to Original message |
28. Nominated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 08:21 PM Response to Reply #28 |
47. I am glad you nominated this thread. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lunatica (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 06:11 PM Response to Original message |
30. The bill clearly defines just PLANS against the US government... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 06:56 PM Response to Reply #30 |
35. It is intended to protect people and preserve protections GUARANTEED by our Constitution. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 07:00 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. It will basically criminalize internet discussion boards the WH doesn't like. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 07:08 PM Response to Reply #36 |
40. HOW? DAMN!!!! Are you ASSUMING the WH HOLDS ALL POWER? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 07:11 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. "SHUT THE FUCK UP!!!!!" is exactly the point of this legislation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 07:26 PM Response to Reply #41 |
45. PROTECT PEOPLE!!!!! PROTECT PEOPLE FROM OPPRESSION is the POINT!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donkeyotay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 07:04 PM Response to Reply #30 |
38. This is the thought police act. These vague definitions include anyone they want. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 07:14 PM Response to Reply #38 |
42. NOPE!!!! This legislation THREATENS limpballs and coultergiest and savage. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jade Fox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 06:35 PM Response to Original message |
31. Is it just me, or does this paragraph sound like....us...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 08:20 PM Response to Reply #31 |
46. Yup. You are being so paranoid that a bill PROTECTING US is interpreted as,... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jade Fox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 10:35 PM Response to Reply #46 |
49. Would you care to explain..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnyxCollie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-20-07 12:23 AM Response to Reply #46 |
52. It's a bill protecting THEM, not YOU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TalkingDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-20-07 08:54 AM Response to Reply #46 |
55. Got just 3 words for you: Martin Luther King. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nashville_brook (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-20-07 02:48 PM Response to Reply #46 |
60. SNT -- are you sure you've read this right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 11:28 PM Response to Original message |
50. kick! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-19-07 11:59 PM Response to Original message |
51. K&R. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-20-07 07:19 AM Response to Original message |
54. Badly written law. Democracies aren't in the business of status crimes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-20-07 09:10 AM Response to Original message |
56. DemocracyNow is covering this right now....Senate hearings this week... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perry Logan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-20-07 09:22 AM Response to Original message |
58. The ACLU thinks it's "wrongheaded," but they're not freaking out about it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-20-07 10:15 AM Response to Original message |
59. All in all it's just another brick in the wall. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-20-07 08:00 PM Response to Original message |
61. and kick.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 11th 2024, 06:42 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC