Richard Perle interviewed on BBC program, "Hardtalk", earlier today. Perle wants to do the same thing to Iran as was done to Iraq.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/hardtalk/7108199.stmReal Player video stream;
http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsa/n5ctrl/progs/07/hardtalk/perle_22nov.ramHe lies with such natural flair.
An interesting interview, but it excludes one thought; that Iraq was destabilized intentionally, and this is precisely the Neocon plan for Iran.
This idea is fleshed out by British author, Nafeez Mossadeq Ahmed, in his
analysis of another BBC propaganda piece that aired last month;
Ineptitude, lack of foresight and mismanagement no doubt played a role. Ware would have us believe they played the only role. Seemingly critical of Anglo-American policymaking, it’s important to note that Ware’s BBC investigation rarely attempts to actually subject any of the individuals he interviews to meaningful scrutiny. The entire programme assumes that Anglo-American objectives in Iraq were, and are, fundamentally to create a stable, democratic country; that officials were genuine and sincere in their intentions, but were so pre-occupied by rushing to war and some unspecified “ideology”, that they simply “recklessly” failed to plan properly. This failure then, while worthy of harsh criticism, was still a matter of sheer stupidity on the part of our governments...
Sadly, I think Nafeez is correct. Destabilization is the name of the game. These wars have no support from people on the street... they are by and for Big Oil and the M.I.C., public support be damned.
Happy Thanksgiving.