Justice Stevens and the tipping point

Justice Stevens and the tipping point

How the Supreme Court would look if its strongest liberal voice, now 87, were to exit may well depend on the presidential election.

By David G. Savage, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
November 23, 2007


WASHINGTON — Justice John Paul Stevens, 87, last week became the second-oldest justice in the Supreme Court's history. Only Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, who retired at 90 in 1932, served to an older age.

Although Stevens has given no hint of retiring and shows no sign of slowing down -- in the courtroom, he looks and sounds much as he did 20 years ago -- the question of his tenure looms over the court and the 2008 presidential campaign.

If there is a tipping point in the Supreme Court's future, it is likely to come with his departure. What kind of justice would replace him -- and how strong the court's slim conservative majority would be -- may well depend on who is elected president.

Stevens, a lifelong Republican, was appointed to the high court in 1975 by President Ford. He succeeded William O. Douglas, a New Deal-era liberal, and soon helped form a moderate-to-conservative coalition that restored the death penalty as an option for states.

In the last decade, however, he has emerged as the strongest voice for the court's shrinking liberal wing. Stevens supports the strict separation of church and state, a woman's right to choose abortion and strong protection for the environment. This year he wrote the opinion for the 5-4 majority that said the government may restrict greenhouse gases as a threat to the environment.

The court's last remaining World War II veteran, he also has insisted that the Bush administration must abide by the standards of the Geneva Convention in its treatment of prisoners in the war on terrorism.

more...

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-stevens23nov23,0,2336740,full.story?coll=la-home-nation

This story alone should give you shame.

Imagine another Reighwinger taking Stevens place.

I agree the Court is important, but it doesn't seem like our representatives are willing to block them, even given the opportunity.

Great article.