State-by-state Voting-Methods Mix & Deviations of '04 Recorded VoteCounts from Exit Polls "Vote" (x)

The percentage mix of National Voting Methods () are comprised of:

DREs- 29%   Optical scanners- 37%   Levers-18%   Punch cards- 12%   Paper- 2%   Unknown/Other- 2%.

• Kerry won the state-weighted national poll by 51.8-47.2%.
  
• The net 4.26m "red-shift" is based on the average state exit poll WPE
  
• There were 1249 precincts exit-polled nationwide.
  
• The largest vote deviations and corresponding machine mix were in the following states:
  ...

Recorded 2-party vote by Voting Method:
...

Total Deviation to Bush from Exit Poll:
...

State Exit Polls: Average Within Precinct Error:
...

Exit Poll Precincts: Voting Method by Location-size
...
State Voting Method Mix
Dev  - Deviation from recorded vote (in thousands)
WPE  - Within Precinct Error ( - Kerry   + Bush )

                                         PERCENTAGE MIX                                     

  ST         WPE     Dev      DRE     Opti    Lever   Punch   Paper   Other
  CA       -10.9%   -668       29      66       0       4       0       0  
  NY       -11.4%   -415        1       0      99       0       0       0  
  OH       -10.9%   -305       16      12       0      72       0       0  
  FL        -7.6%   -287       56      44       0       0       0       0  
  PA        -8.8%   -252       26      12      49      12       1       0  
  
  NC       -11.3%   -197       43      43       2       9       0       4  
  TX        -4.8%   -177       45      45       3       5       2       0  
  NJ        -9.7%   -174       73       1      25       0       0       0  
  MI        -6.3%   -151        4      60      12      20       4       0  
...
  MD        -8.1%    -96      100       0       0       0       0       0  
...
  SC       -10.0%    -80       86      14       0       0       0       0  
...
  CO        -6.1%    -64       37      61       0       1       0       0  
...
  NH       -13.6%    -46        0      65       0       0      35       0  
...
  NV       -10.1%    -41      100       0       0       0       0       0  
...
  GA        -2.2%    -36      100       0       0       0       0       0  
...
  NM        -7.8%    -29       90      10       0       0       0       0  
...
  IA        -3.0%    -22       11      88       1       0       0       0  
...
  Votes            -4258    -1215   -1564    -788    -514     -89     -88  
  Mix               100%     28.5%   36.7%   18.5%   12.1%    2.1%    2.1% 

Propaganda is a sprinter, but truth is a long-distance runner.
...
Despite compelling statistical, circumstantial, anecdotal and eyewitness evidence that two presidential and numerous congressional elections have been stolen, this evidence has been discounted, ignored and ridiculed by the mainstream media and, amazingly, by the victimized Democratic Party and its defeated candidates and even by some progressive publications.

Even so, a sizeable and growing portion of the American public isn’t buying the official and bi-partisan assurances that the US elections are, by and large, on the level, and that the Bush/Cheney regime is therefore legitimate. For example, an August, 2006 Zogby poll reports that only 45% of the population is “very confident” that Bush and Cheney won re-election “fair and square” in 2004. About a third were “not at all confident.”

In the “Afterword” to Fooled Again, comprising one hundred pages of new material, Miller chronicles the determined and persistent resistance of “official Democrats” to the very idea that they were the victims of massive election fraud. Astonishingly, progressive publications (yes, there are still a few), such as The Nation, Mother Jones, and the liberal websites, TomPaine.com and Salon.com, have all published caustic articles debunking thoroughly researched and scrupulously argued accusations of election fraud. Familiar ad hominem rebuttals are trotted out: “get over it,” “sore losers,” “conspiracy theorists.” Far more often, the fraud issue is denied even the dignity of mention and rebuttal. With the noteworthy exception of Catherine Crier and Lou Dobbs, the issue is virtually ignored on cable “news,” and, on network TV news, the embargo is total. ...