Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If everyone stopped shopping...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-25-07 11:00 PM
Original message
If everyone stopped shopping...
...I think there's be such a tremendous leap forward with innovative, useful, life-improving products in order to get people shopping again.

Discuss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-25-07 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Farmers would be paid their true value.. and the wallstreet boys
would be out there picking at harvest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-25-07 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Define "shopping"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-25-07 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I mean, if the savings rate from 0% to 50% due to people putting money in the bank
rather than buying quickly depreciating junk they didn't need in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-25-07 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Aha, so it's not just "shopping" it's consumerism, so to speak
Or at least that's what I'm garnering from your posts.

If I'm wrong, I apologize.

If I'm right, I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qdemn7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-25-07 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Uh-huh...
Until massive inflation started occurring as all that money in the backs started chasing a much smaller investment base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. banks invest money in savings accounts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #6
18. Half the Time We're Just Replacing the Broken Junk That We DO Need
It is really hard to find quality products these days.

if the savings rate from 0% to 50% due to people putting money in the bank


That might be rather difficult considering how much money people have to put in their tank now.

Even if they do, the money is depreciating even faster.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-25-07 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. If said we can't afford to shop anymore, they might care if we had jobs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-25-07 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. k & r for a great thought -- sorry, too tired to discuss at this point. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertarianAtheist Donating Member (60 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-25-07 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. your post pre-supposes something that isn't true
Edited on Sun Nov-25-07 11:08 PM by LibertarianAtheist
there are plenty of items that improve the lives of people already. your post seemingly says that items that improve the lives of others, are useful, or innovative aren't already being produced by leaps and bounds. People have shopped an incredible amount and we have seen plenty of innovation and product utility.

And there is no single definition of a product's utility or innovativeness. Some see the iPod as incredibly usefull, innovative, and life improving. Others think it's a stupid product. Nobody is right and nobody is wrong on that issue.

edit to correct spelling error
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-25-07 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. You should read The Health of Nations.
It has an interesting chapter on using class anxiety to get people to buy things they don't need, which is easier to do in countries with huge income inequality. Apparently, in Sweden, where there's more income equality, it's hard to get people to buy things they do not need. People buy cell phones if they make sense, and not because they're afraid people will think they're poor if they don't have one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertarianAtheist Donating Member (60 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-25-07 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. well that's a different topic altogether
promoting a message that "you're a poor son of a bitch for not having a cell phone" doesn't take away from the utility, innovation, etc. of a cellular phone. It's using a stupid message to get people to buy something. Stupid marketing doesn't equal product uselessness.

And I'm wondering how the inevitable economic collapse following a total stoppage of shopping will allow more people to be more innovative in their products. People need capital to create a product. If somebody isn't buying something, then they will be unable to possess the means with which to create something innovative and useful. Unless people started creating amazing things out of essentially nothing. Which is basically christian creationist bullshit put to an economic model.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Thug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. It's not stupid marketing. It's very deliberate marketing..
utilizing every word ever written on human psychology and cognitive science. It's, pure and simple, very sophisticated propaganda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-25-07 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. An innovative, useful, life-improving X-Box?
Edited on Sun Nov-25-07 11:12 PM by gatorboy
Sign me up!

Speaking of which, I probably got my son the very definition of un-innovative, useless, non life-improving gift. :P

http://www.tngames.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-25-07 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. The same could be said for a lot of things which waste people's time
Such as watching TV or playing video games.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-25-07 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. or arguing on the internets with strangers
But I always save a fair amount of money, maybe not as much money as I waste, but a fair amount, especially considering my low income.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-25-07 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
11. Would be better to support local stores instead of chains. Keep the money
in your community. Put your money in your local bank, not a chain. Do NOT spend money in big chains that take money out of your community and end up investing in the repug party or things you don't believe in. THAT would actually make a difference. Catherine Austin Fitts goes further and says to create stocks out of your local community. Very interesting stuff at www.solari.com for those interested in real change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qdemn7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-25-07 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
14. Good idea, UNTIL
You realize just how many people work in retail sales. Think about the "Black Friday" phenomenon. If retail business doesn't start to make a profit until the 4Q, logic tells you that we really only NEED 25% of the current retail stores for retail sales to make a monthly profit.

The point is this:

Just how many people would loose their jobs, and thus their cars, homes and other big ticket items? That would have a trickle down effect as home, car and other sales drop. How many people no longer cook, and only eat out? How many restaurants would close? What would you propose to do with all these jobless?

The final point is that the American Consumer may buy a lot of crap SOME PEOPLE don't think they need, but the consumer sure as hell wants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Thug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. To me, your point emphasizes the insanity of the system.
So people have to go on buying shit they really don't need to prop up a system that continues to abandon those people that are supposed to buy this shit all the while reducing their wages and benefits in exchange for credit that keeps them buying the shit that they don't need and then enslaves them to that same shit, which makes them fearful of losing their jobs, which makes it less likely that they will stand up for themselves out of fear of losing what little they have and keeps them cowering about the credit hounds who they are now defenseless against (with the the recent changes to bankruptcy law...)...

What a fucked up system.

And there's a big difference between 'want' and 'need.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. That was an excellent post.
Thank you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
16. Sales people would start to be laid off
AND where you going to get food, clothing and essentials. NO way can you stop buying some things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 05:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC