|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 11:51 AM Original message |
Leahy: Bush not involved in US Attorneys Firings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
1. Bush can overturn this by admitting he was involved in illegal firings LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 11:55 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. But, you see, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 11:54 AM Response to Original message |
2. Just do it, Leahy. Stop talking about it and JUST DO IT. We'll get the message that it's happened. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 11:56 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. JUST DO IT.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 01:03 PM Response to Reply #2 |
15. How can Leahy schedule the vote? Did I miss his becoming |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
5. No, but I love the logic he used. If Bush wasn't involved, no privilege, and if he was involved, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 11:59 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. But, did he commit a crime if he was involved? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 12:00 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. Wow, Leahy's good. Really good. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 12:10 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. All hat... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 04:18 PM Response to Reply #12 |
25. All LIES, NO Privilige Either. Gotta love that one! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 02:26 PM Response to Reply #5 |
19. Yes, Senator Leahy's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 11:57 AM Response to Original message |
6. Leahy's nothing but a bag of wind. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 12:00 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Was a time I would have disagreed with you on that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 11:59 AM Response to Original message |
8. Kinda reminds me of the Senate Intelligence Committee's Phase II reports |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 12:00 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Out of sight, out of mind. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
13. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
14. .. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 02:15 PM Response to Original message |
16. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 02:20 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. The thing is, ratty, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 02:23 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Aggravating is what it is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BornagainDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
20. Good move by Leahy. He's fightin' the bastids afterall. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chicago1 (560 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 03:18 PM Response to Original message |
21. Patrick Leahy is probably up to IMPEACHMENT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
22. hey, leave the House alone, they have a FISA bill to write.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catmandu57 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
23. Yeah yeah yeah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
24. Friends, don't forget that Feinstein, in committee voted for telecom immunity in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 11th 2024, 10:14 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC