|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-01-08 09:33 PM Original message |
NYT: Sex Offenders Are Barred From Internet by New Jersey |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomInTib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-01-08 09:46 PM Response to Original message |
1. I guess it's the equivalent of a suspended DL for DUIs. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-01-08 11:41 PM Response to Reply #1 |
12. I see what you're getting at, but I think there are two problems with your analogy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomInTib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-01-08 11:45 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. I am with you, completely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-02-08 12:11 AM Response to Reply #12 |
19. I think his analogy is valid, but both concepts share similar problems in practical application. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KamaAina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-02-08 03:41 PM Response to Reply #12 |
27. The third problem is that there is no such thing as an "Internet license" -- yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-02-08 10:43 PM Response to Reply #27 |
32. Interesting. So the question is raised whether |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-01-08 09:49 PM Response to Original message |
2. your link needs to be fixed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-01-08 09:54 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Thank you. It's fixed now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-01-08 09:56 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. and i have no idea how they'd enforce it, it looks like a feel good piece of legislation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-01-08 11:44 PM Response to Reply #4 |
13. My first guess is with polygraphs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-02-08 03:36 PM Response to Reply #13 |
26. Polygraphs are inadmissable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-02-08 05:45 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. Nonetheless, people are having their probation and/or parole revoked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-02-08 06:00 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-02-08 06:45 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Here ya go: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-02-08 10:29 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. The polygraph results were not used |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-02-08 10:55 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. Results? No. But the polygraph is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-02-08 11:13 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. This case deals solely with the validity of a confession the defendant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 06:26 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. But I think that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-01-08 10:02 PM Response to Original message |
5. That's Just Not Right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SPKrazy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-01-08 10:08 PM Response to Original message |
6. that's a bit of a high bar to try to meet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bklyncowgirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-01-08 10:18 PM Response to Original message |
7. Good luck enforcing that one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sanctified (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-01-08 10:34 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. It's quite enforceable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sanctified (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-01-08 10:27 PM Response to Original message |
8. Individuals who use the internet to commit crimes regularly get banned from using it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TZ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-01-08 11:15 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. not all convicted sex offenders on pedophiles or online predators |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-01-08 11:38 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. The key, of course, being regularly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
americanstranger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-01-08 11:46 PM Response to Original message |
15. That story is incorrect, I think. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-01-08 11:49 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. It's actually in Jersey. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
americanstranger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-01-08 11:51 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. I realize the OP was talking about NJ. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-02-08 12:01 AM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Right, but the article said that there is no federal law that enforces it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
americanstranger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-02-08 12:15 AM Response to Reply #18 |
21. Right. and I said that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-02-08 12:11 AM Response to Original message |
20. Murderers, however, can still use computers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-02-08 01:21 AM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Even if they used a computer to help commit their crime |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Didereaux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-02-08 01:28 AM Response to Original message |
23. another well thought out approach to the problem...NOT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Heidi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-02-08 01:39 AM Response to Original message |
24. Another manipulative attempt to make the public feel safer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nutmegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-02-08 01:45 AM Response to Original message |
25. More stupid crap to make people feel good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 16th 2024, 12:07 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC