Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why is Edwards minimized by the media?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:06 PM
Original message
Why is Edwards minimized by the media?
Could it be that by attacking corporate greed, he's attacking THEM (and their advertising revenue)?










They are part of the problem he's fighting.

See more of the big ten: http://www.thenation.com/special/bigten.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. media = big corporations
nt

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeanruss Donating Member (194 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
46. edwards media blackout
I think we should each let these media giants know that what they are doing to Edwards is so un-American-it demonstrates to me just not free our information really is-our news is so filtered that important info is not available-It really frightens me that we are being manipulated-What other issues has the media held back from us? A cancer cure? a new clean, cheap energy? a pending global warning report? I have let the 4 big networks know that they have lost me as a viewer AND a consumer over this issue-you can't HAVE a democracy without an unbiased press-watching the treatment of Edwards makes me realize just how dire things are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yep. That's it. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. They are silencing the best hope for America. We just need to
make sure that your question continues to be asked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
28. Oh really....why the hell
they refused to answer an Iowan caucus voters' question regarding health care and insurance, this I saw at C-Span1, this happens during the time when each candidates organizers where....whats the word...cajole, well this is the exchange I saw, and they knew the camera was there too.

He was literally telling the Edwards organizers that he went to them with one question....one question and they could not respond to him about that question, according to him this is suppose to be one of Edwards' strong point, health care and insurance, he continued by saying he waited for them to get back to him, not only waited but called them several times, no one got back to him, turns out this particular guy had awhole lot of disenfranchise voters looking for the right candidate.

anyway long story short....they went with Obama because he not only respond to his and other voters needs but went further in explaining how they can achieve this together.

Later during the night when I switched back over to C-Span1 there he was voting on a referendum that they are looking for in a candidate to address (health and insurance), at the town hall meeting.

To me this shows lack of interest and organization from the Edwards camp, and you're surprised why he is being silenced, you and me both are not out there, we have no idea what goes on when the camera is switched off, for me I'm not surprised, most of these guys switched off when the camera is off, one could only imagine what is being said behind the camera.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rambis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. I asked Obama people over and over about health care
Edited on Fri Jan-04-08 02:49 PM by Rambis
"I asked... How do I qualify for the 2,500$ savings on health care? How poor do I have to be? How rich do I have to be? Is it a percentage of my income? How will I see savings?
They talked about electronic records saving the insurance companies money? I asked how does that benefit us they are the ones saving not us. Is there a pool/fund for catastrophic illness coverage?
the answer I got was... "every candidate is going to have to compromise on health care not matter what the plan is" Great, but what about my questions? I have read the website but it really doesn't address the question of health care directly. It all seems pie in the sky stuff? Reform but no real nuts and bolts about how?

Fire away!
I am asking here because I never got an answer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. Hey, I'm not the expert here
I'm just responding to the post that wants to know why the media is trying to silenced Edwards per se, just giving one of the many reasons IMHO, which I don't think they are (the media).....I would be the wrong guy to respond to your technicality question.

I just would.

I'm not afraid to say, I have no freaking idea how this whole health care and insurance is going to work in America with the type of strangle hold the insurance companies hold on the government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rambis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. I agree
I just never got a good answer and maybe somebody will give one. If the corp media would report what Edwards says on the stump things would be different. Obama Hillary are good ratings Edwards would be good for the country IMHO of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zazzle Donating Member (220 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #30
37. Obama has already omitted 15M of us - BEFORE he begins negotiations with the Insurance industry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacock Donating Member (189 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #28
47. I saw that & didn´t believe him
And his question was about "public health".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. The commercial media are part of the problem and Edwards is part of the solution, therefore,
so therefore, Edwards is the corporate, commercial media's enemy. So what motivation do they have to give him any airtime?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zazzle Donating Member (220 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 10:36 AM
Original message
the media chooses our candidates - the candidates who will continue corporate welfare
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zazzle Donating Member (220 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #4
38. the media chooses our candidates - the candidates who will continue corporate welfare
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. They choose who they will allow in their game through money and media
and leave out the ones, and now just the one left to fight them, Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. I do believe you answered your own question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. The media fears a John Edwards Presidency.
Because they know that's it for their bullshit. Edwards is going to shake up the status quo in Washington like never before, and it's high time someone did it.

EDWARDS IS THE MAN IF YOU WANT CHANGE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. He's the biggest threat
Let's face it, Hillarly and Barak will go along with the status quo, besides pukes want one of them to be the nominee because they figure conservatives will not vote for a woman or a black man. If Edwards is the Dem nominee, repukes will have no chance at all of retaining the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tex-wyo-dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. Exactly...
Edited on Fri Jan-04-08 12:24 PM by tex-wyo-dem
Almost all the major "news" media is owned by a select few huge corporate conglomerates that make money from such things as deregulation, war, shock capitalism and globalization. They are among the biggest contributors to candidates and most influential lobbyists to politicians who, in turn, promise to support passing legislation that directly subsidizes their bottom line.

So it's no surprise that Edwards is ignored, minimized and marginalized by the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. BINGO....
I've been saying this so long I feel like a broken record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. THAT is it! They will minimize him, ignore him, nit-pick every freakin' word he says, because they
know there corporate greed days will be OVER if he's the prez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
12. It's not the big ten anymore. It's the big 6 now. Here's a better image. (LARGE FILE WARNING)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. True. My link is a few years old.
Thanks for the update. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #12
42. That's an excellent graphic! Thank you for posting it! (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
13. Who's counting the votes in NH?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lisainmilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
14. MSNBC just called it a two way race?
Between Obama and Clinton!

M$M BS!

keep fighting John!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
15. They are terrified of Edwards. So they are trying to silence him by ignoring
his campaign and focusing entirely on Obama and Clinton.

Go Johnny, go!!!!!

I happen to think he's gonna pull it off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackstraw45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
16. K&R
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaptBunnyPants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
17. Even the BBC is at it.
I watched their Iowa coverage, and I don't even know if I heard John Edwards name. First they talked about the first place candidate, then they talked about the third place candidate, then the segment was over. I know he didn't win, but one would think beating Clinton would earn him some coverage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
18. Bingo !
And Edwards should point it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. YES!!
I hope he finds an acceptable way to point this out. He needs to phrase it just right though so they don't turn it back on him too badly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az_lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
19. you got it, he's a threat to them....Go John!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kajsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
21. Yep, yessir!

Bottom line.

he's attacking corporate greed= the big MSM dudes/dudettes
who make the decisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
22. Because the Jack Welches of the world want it that way.
They were counting on him to finish 4th or 5th thanks to their wholesale ignorance of him.

He finished 2nd. Without spending even near as much as Clinton or Obama.

Time for a plan B, PIGS! Better lure him on an underfueled plane or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
24. I go further than that
I think there is a somewhat vast big-money conspiracy to make Clinton the nominee, and that the media is part of it. True they have been attacking her for the last month or so, because it looked like she had the nomination sewn up. She probably still does, but the media started attacking her as the nominee, as part of their general war on Democrats which is part of their war on progressives, and also tried to create more of an exciting down-to-the-wire horserace. Big money wants the Republicans in office. Failing that, they will settle for the DLC. Either way, it's heads, they win, or tails, we lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
25. Yes, that 'could be' the reason.
Unbelievable. Then again when Dean was a stated thread he became 'looney' so ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
26. Because he's boring?
He's boring.

And he's my candidate.

This year.

But I've watched and listened to him since 1999.

He's boring.

This year he's been the least boring.

His wife is one of the smartest people on the planet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
27. Because he lacks charisma
finesse and finally he came in a close second.

anything else you wanna know?


:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
29. MEDIA = WHO HE'S FIGHTING AGAINST
It's pretty obvious to me why they call beating Hillary "weakened!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
31. K&R!
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joe_sixpack Donating Member (655 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
32. I am a supporter of Joe Biden
welcome to our world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #32
36. I was hoping Joe would do better.
He was my #2 choice. Sorry to see him go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
35. He's a (desperately needed) threat to the status quo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phred42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
39. A Thin Line to Walk
I have been out of work since May and I am getting close to loosing my house.
I have sent the Edwards campaign $50 on two separate occasions - so far. The second time being the day after Iowa.

Be careful in the Lions Den.

Howard Dean was looking good until he went on Hardball(?)and stated that he wanted to break up the Corporate Media conglomerates. The day after he said that the Media began trashing him and did everything they could to screw him. And they were successful. Thom Hartmann tells this story once in a while.

I agree that Corporate Media Must be broken up as part of saving Democracy and I admire Edwards for taking OUR side against the Corporatists. But as his popularity grows so will the fear of the Corporations. He is backing a rabid animal into a corner. Dangerous enough but if Edwards draws blood too soon and that animal feels wounded, the attacks will be something special.

Careful John - we NEED you in the White House.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Coliniere Donating Member (581 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
40. Out of sight.....
out of mind. John who? This is the effect the media hopes to achieve.
I gave to Mr. Edwards today. I hope you will too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackdog4241 Donating Member (94 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
41. BOO ,HOO.....
As a Kucinich voter I'd like to welcome you to the club.
Now Johnny come lately can feel the pain.:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stubtoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
43. For now they ignore him. If he wins NH or SC, they'll start with the swiftboating.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stimbox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
44. Maybe he should ask Dennis. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
45. Tough toenails...
Edwards supporters were not crying when THE best possible candidate was given the cold shoulder.

THAT was Joe Biden.

Suck it up and stop Crying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. I'm not crying.
Just making a statement.

FWIW, Biden was my #2. So I guess I should really suck it up and stop Crying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC