Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Video of Sleeping Guards Shakes Nuclear Industry

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 01:26 PM
Original message
Video of Sleeping Guards Shakes Nuclear Industry
Source: Washington Post

Video of Sleeping Guards Shakes Nuclear Industry

Sight of Guards Asleep Shakes Industry

By Steven Mufson
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, January 4, 2008; Page A01


Kerry Beal was taken aback when he discovered last March that many of his fellow security guards at the Peach Bottom nuclear power plant in Pennsylvania were taking regular naps in what they called "the ready room."

When he spoke to supervisors at his company, Wackenhut Corp., they told Beal to be a team player. When he alerted the regional office of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, regulators let the matter drop after the plant's owner, Exelon, said it found no evidence of guards asleep on the job.

So Beal videotaped the sleeping guards. The tape, eventually given to WCBS, a CBS television affiliate in New York City, showed the armed workers snoozing against walls, slumped on tabletops or with eyes closed and heads bobbing.

The fallout of the broadcast is still being felt. Last month, Exelon, the country's largest provider of nuclear power, fired Wackenhut, which had guarded each of its 10 nuclear plants. The NRC is reviewing its own oversight procedures, having failed to heed Beal's warning. And Wackenhut says that the entire nuclear industry needs to rethink security if it hopes to meet the tougher standards the NRC has tried to impose since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States.



Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/03/AR2008010304442.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Homer Simpson is alive and...sleeping on the job nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Caught in the act:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. "An underreported attack on a South African nuclear facility last month ..."
I'm glad the Washington Post is starting to cover these stories.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/19/AR2007121901857.html

A Nuclear Site Is Breached
South African Attack Should Sound Alarms

By Micah Zenko
Thursday, December 20, 2007; Page A29

An underreported attack on a South African nuclear facility last month demonstrates the high risk of theft of nuclear materials by terrorists or criminals. Such a crime could have grave national security implications for the United States or any of the dozens of countries where nuclear materials are held in various states of security.

Shortly after midnight on Nov. 8, four armed men broke into the Pelindaba nuclear facility 18 miles west of Pretoria, a site where hundreds of kilograms of weapons-grade uranium are stored. According to the South African Nuclear Energy Corp., the state-owned entity that runs the Pelindaba facility, these four "technically sophisticated criminals" deactivated several layers of security, including a 10,000-volt electrical fence, suggesting insider knowledge of the system. Though their images were captured on closed-circuit television, they were not detected by security officers because nobody was monitoring the cameras at the time.

So, undetected, the four men spent 45 minutes inside one of South Africa's most heavily guarded "national key points" -- defined by the government as "any place or area that is so important that its loss, damage, disruption or immobilization may prejudice the Republic."

Eventually, the attackers broke into the emergency control center in the middle of the facility, stole a computer (which was ultimately left behind) and breached an electronically sealed control room. After a brief struggle, they shot Anton Gerber, an off-duty emergency services officer. Gerber later explained that he was hanging around because he believed (reasonably, in retrospect) that his fiancée -- a site supervisor -- was not safe at work. Although badly injured, Gerber triggered the alarm, setting off sirens and lights and alerting police stationed a few miles away.

<snip>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emlev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. This deserves its own OP
If it hasn't gotten one already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. I've made a number of posts about it
Gun battle in reactor control room - Nuclear industry tries to censor the story
Sun Nov 11th 2007, 07:09 PM
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=115x120921

South Africa nuclear research facility admits to second break-in
Tue Nov 13th 2007, 08:40 AM
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x3064484

NYT: Break-In at Nuclear Site Baffles South Africa
Sat Nov 17th 2007, 05:06 AM
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=115x121970

Suspect arrested in connection with the daring break-in at the Pelindaba nuclear facility
Wed Nov 21st 2007, 07:25 AM
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=115x122539

WP: A Nuclear Site Is Breached
Thu Dec 20th 2007, 11:22 AM
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=115x126576

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
23. Just what I was thinking! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. There Have Been Warnings for the Last 20 Years About This
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Yes, and not only at nuclear plants, refineries are also good places to get some shut eye
This one story is going to do nothing but get one or two minimum wage guards fired and then it will be business as usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. "The fallout of the broadcast is still being felt."
They just can't resist, can they? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yuugal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. Its certainly a glowing example
of how a story like this can radiate outward from its ground zero. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. If the security people can sleep at work, THEY must not take the 'terra talk' too seriously
Wonder what Wackenhut knows about the terra snow job that they don't want us to wake up to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
20. Wanted to say that, but didn't want to tempt fate --- !!!
We have to believe that terrorists flew over the NY reactor --- !!!

And didn't bother it because they wanted to send a msg to Wall Street re the WTC . . .
which incidently was going to have to be dismantled --- !!!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. thank you kerry beal. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Acadia Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. The tip of the iceberg. Wake up America to corporate greed and
lack of oversight. Also they underpay so the employees don't feel compelled to be responsible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. These things aren't even insurable --- taxpayers have to take the risk on them !!!
And we have the Repugs trying to line up a whole new generation of these nuclear duds which harm the public ---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Sorry They are GREAT!
only way to viably generate industrial power cheaply. Many companies move from socal to nc because power costs 1/7th as much.

Nuke power. Just ask france and the US Navy. Reactors are safe and effective.

Need 300MW build a reactor.

Nuke power is not a political issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. Great disasters, in the main --- leaking still connected to leukemia --- etal --
There is any "only" way ---
These plants all use up oil at any rate --- one way or another.

Sununu's involvement certainly makes nuclear power a political issue ---
Cheney's involvement certainly makes nuclear power a political issue ---
Bush's involvement certainly makes nuclear power a political issue ---

Even Scialia came out to help Cheney "duck" loosening the paper work on the energy meetings ---

So far nuclear weapons haven't directly and immediately harmed us ---
are you willing to say they never will?

Of course not ---

and the same with nuclear reactors --- they are a SLEEPING threat to us all ---


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fenriswolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #18
25. dont forget
the chemical and radioactive waste nuclear energy produces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinniped Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. Sleeping seems to be a favorite past time of the security guard.
Patelco credit union has a sleepy guard, too.

I hope he never has to shoot anyone with crust in his eyes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yuugal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. I wouldn't have had any sleep in college
if it weren't for my security guard gig on the graveyard shift. My favorite location was guarding a new Caldor they were building. The piles of "GrandMa's extra fluffy pillows" and large screen tv's was a really bad combo for security. Then again, noone ever stole anything so maybe it was worth it for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
16. Is anyone really surprised?
The Billions that the US government has spent on Security (wink, wink) that our Nuclear plants would be protected?

If this is the security of Nuclear Plants...what about companies that produce chemicals like clorox...Bopal anyone..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. These things are falling apart; operarting on extended contracts with promises of repairs --- !!!
As we immediately understood, these things are too dangerous to accommodate human error ---

SLEEPING murder ---


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gauguin57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
21. I live near both this nuke plant and Three Mile Island.
Edited on Sat Jan-05-08 12:43 AM by gauguin57
I want my potassium iodide pills!!!!!!!

When neo-environmentalists (who didn't march against nuke power back in the 70s and 80s like I did) wanna "bring back" nuke power as a "safe" solution for global warming, I say come to Pennsylvania and take a little look around at our nuke plants. Sleeping guards at one (and this isn't the first incident of its kind at Peach Bottom) and smoke coming out of only two towers at the other (because one half of the plant is full of nuke waste from that little "oops" in the '70s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. I remember TMI.
I was in school at the time, and we got another week off. Many kids running for the east coast, where panicky parents got very scary reports. (It seems what we heard there was a lot of "don't worry, no big deal").

Yeah, all the "advantages" aside, until someone can answer what to do with the toxic and very long-lasting waste, nuclear power isn't something I'm interested in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
22. Perhaps they should hire a "drinking bird" to watch the plant
Like Homer Simpson did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC