Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Delusional President-Bush Compares Himself To Washington & Lincoln (Scott Horton)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 08:36 AM
Original message
The Delusional President-Bush Compares Himself To Washington & Lincoln (Scott Horton)
Edited on Sun Jan-06-08 08:39 AM by kpete
The Delusional President

BY Scott Horton
PUBLISHED January 6, 2008

In an interview with the Israeli newspaper Yediot, President Bush compared himself with Washington and Lincoln–as he has done dozens of times before–discusses his foreign policy aspirations and expectations on the eve of a visit to Israel and the West Bank. Bush believes future generations will understand the brilliance of his foreign policy, and that a final peace between Israelis and Palestinians is now immediately within grasp. Even discounting for the fact that the interview is about objectives rather than reality, Bush’s detachment from reality is striking. Here are a couple of key graphs:

Question by Yediot: Do you mean that your administration will win retroactive fame, like the administration of president Truman, for example? Bush replies: ‘Every president contends with different circumstances. I hope that when people will look back to my administration, they will say that president Bush and his administration worked diligently in order to defend the American people from evil; that president Bush identified the threats of the 21st Century; that when he was required to act forcefully he acted with strength, and when he was required to present vision he understood the strength of freedom to bring change’…

Bush says in regard to Olmert: ‘I reached the conclusion that he is a man of vision. He understands the importance of creating hope for the Palestinians in the framework of the state they will establish. And of course, he understands that this is a hope not only for the Palestinians but rather also for the Israelis. After all, he ran in the elections on the basis of a certain platform. The support for two states is a substantive change in the Israeli concept, a change which began already with Ariel Sharon. This concept is built on the assumption that freedom brings peace’.

Bush continues: ‘Olmert, of course, wouldn’t want that the state will be established without certain conditions first being guaranteed. Because of this I say, a state subordinate to the road map. And the US recognizes the fact that a state cannot be established which will preserve the aspiration to destroy its neighbor. No government can accept this, and I understand it’.

Bush says: ‘The US can assist the two sides. I intend in my journey on strengthening the confidence of the two sides in the vision. My trip is more than a visit to Israel and to the Palestinian territories. I am traveling to the Arab states for three reasons. The first, to persuade these states that Israel is a partner and it must be a partner for peace. This is an interest not only of Israel and the Palestinians but rather of the entire Arab world’.

‘Second, we had a breakthrough in Annapolis and now we must go in the path of the success which was achieved. The US president can advance the process by reminding allies and friends of America in the Middle East of the importance of a solution of two states and what they can do in order to assist in achieving it’.

‘The third objective of my trip is to discuss with the leaders of the region the strategic ramifications of the American presence, how it strengthens regimes and creates a barrier to Iranian aggression’.


The entire interview can be viewed here.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2008/01/20080104-9.html
http://harpers.org/archive/2008/01/hbc-90002099
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. delusional as in needs to be lock up for his own good
that I agree with
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Naturyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. You *almost* have to feel sorry for this tool
Sorry Shrubby, but history will remember you as one of our the worst presidents. You and your bungling administration even managed to alienate large portions of your own party. Your policies were disastrous, your leadership was foolhardy, and your legacy will be one of multiple failures that your successors will have to clean up.

Lincoln? Washington? Hell no, sir. Try Herbert Hoover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. one of two really crazy bastards in the WH
delusions of self grandeur.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. What a crazy dreamer bush is.
Like most Republicans, he lacks even a rudimentary ability for introspection, to see himself as others see him. He'll go to his grave believing that future historians will declare him, in his genius, the "best president ever."

This is not leadership. This is psychosis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. ---a DANGEROUS dreamer!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
5. ‘Second, we had a breakthrough in Annapolis and now we must go in the path of the success which was


the people putting together his words guffed on this sentence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalmonChantedEvening Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
7. "The US can assist the two sides."
Yeah, by keeping your dopey ass home.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
8. He is a delusional danger to both the people of the US, and the world
and should be standing tall before the man, facing justice in the Hague for the war criminal that he is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
9. his rewriting history is incredible...
also the fact that these LIES are on the WH website and no "news" organizations will pick them apart. Fucking incredible.

<snip>

Q Mr. President, you just mentioned Iraq. Can you clarify to us whether there was any Israeli involvement in your decision to invade Iraq?

THE PRESIDENT: No, not at all. None whatsoever. My decision was based upon U.S. intelligence, based upon the desire to provide security for our peoples and others. It was based upon my willingness to work with the international community on this issue. Remember, if you look back at the history, there was a unanimous vote in the Security Council: disclose, disarm, or face serious consequences. And when he defied, when he refused to allow the inspectors in, when he made a statement by his actions that he didn't really care what the international community said, that I decided to make sure words meant something.

And so I acted based upon our own security interests. And -- but it also fit into this notion of -- and remember, Zarqawi, there was some terrorist connections -- not with the 9/11 attacks, but terrorist connections; Abu Nadal; he had been using -- he'd been funding families of suicide bombers. In other words, as far as we were concerned, he had weapons of mass destruction which could have been used in a deadly way. It turns out he didn't have the weapons, but he had the know-how on how to make weapons, which could easily have been reconstituted. The sanctions regime turns out to have been corrupt and wasn't working. In other words, there's a variety of aspects to my decision, all of which were aimed at making sure that U.S. security, first and foremost, was enhanced.

:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
10. worked diligently in order to defend the American people from evil;
except for ignoring that there PDB onetime, but that was vacation, y'all.

L.
M.
A.
O.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
11. Bush is an Extremely Sick Man (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
12. Bush knows there are "two sides", the other side is "evil" and that's good enough for him.
Fighting evil, sounds like a religious war to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panzerfaust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
13. Gee, did not know he knew that much history
:puke::puke::puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC