|
Edited on Mon Jan-07-08 12:26 AM by demobabe
New York Times blog:
"John Edwards angrily took on Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton"
Politico:
"Edwards responded sharply to a Clinton aide's criticism today, intensifying a back-and-forth..."
CBS:
"John Edwards’s fingers must be cold, because his gloves just came off. (demobabe note: what does this mean? you put gloves on when your fingers are cold)
Angered by remarks made last night by Clinton spokesman Jay Carson...
NY Daily News: (now this is a twofer on both Edwards and Hillary)
EDWARDS HAMMERS 'NO CONSCIENCE' CLINTONISTAS
KEENE, N.H. – An angry John Edwards charged today that the Clinton campaign “has no conscience”
Fox News: (this is actually a surprise)
Responding to a remark by a Clinton aide...
The dispute came one day after the ABC News/Facebook Presidential debates in which both Edwards and Clinton shared a heated exchange...
MSNBC:
Edwards today jumped on a comment by Clinton campaign spokesman
* * * * * * *
What is interesting about all of this is that sure, there is media attention for Edwards. He's Angry. Sharp! He Hammers and charges!
So negative. The Daily News attacked all involved by calling Hillary's staffers "Clintonistas" (anybody remember Sandanistas?) But if you're writing a news story, these kinds of words are editorializing and don't belong in these articles - except blogs blur the lines between journalism and opinion, and now everything seems to be opinion articles.
Weird is that the FOX News article was perhaps the most 'fair and balanced' of them all. No, I don't like FOX News, but it reminded me that in every organization - even biased ones, there are generally staffers in big organizations that don't share the same bias as the company they work for. This particularly applies on weekends.
MSNBC was pretty fair, too.
But when it comes down to the facts (like Edwards beating Clinton in Iowa), and generally talking about the race, Edwards is still missing.
|