Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Guys, the war on Edwards is real: Big Business: F**k "Kumbaya"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 04:48 PM
Original message
Guys, the war on Edwards is real: Big Business: F**k "Kumbaya"
Edited on Tue Jan-08-08 04:54 PM by jsamuel
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/1/8/154916/3338/281/432971
by occams hatchet
Guess what? Here’s a shocker: The president of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has no intention of holding hands and swaying with any presidential candidate who espouses what he calls "anti-corporate and populist rhetoric." Or, as the headline at latimes.com so succinctly put it,

Chamber of Commerce vows to punish anti-business candidates


In case you had any doubts.

...

Here’s what’s true for ALL of the Democratic candidates: Big Business has no intention of being brought to heel without "a cataclysmic fight to the death" - and they have just declared it, in so many words.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. I agree. Edwards would tear the shit apart! When your wife has terminal cancer
the world starts to look different.

Edwards is the man to tear the corparatists a new asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. But..but..but...
how can you tear an asshole an asshole?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #5
58. I think it's called a fistula.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. That is very true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
43. Unfortunately for him
Edwards to a large degree is still driving the conversation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conspirator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 07:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
55. VOTE FOR EDWARDS! Revolution! Let's take down these corporations raping our planet nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. I have no doubts that what you say is true.
The evidence is overwhelming. One would expect Clinton and Obama to dominate, but Edwards surprise strength in Iowa given how much he was outspent is pretty newsworthy; yet you can hear the Crickets chirping.

The powers that be fear an Edwards Presidency most.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
69. Of course they do. These corporations need their balls busted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truth2power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
76. Yes, the media is driving the results. It's amazing how easily the American people are lead..
Edwards came in second in Iowa. And yet, when I watched Gwen Ifil, reporting from NH for the News hour on Tues night, it was all about Obama and Clinton. It was as if even uttering his (Edwards') name might remind the voters that there were more than two Democratic candidates running.

I have no doubt, at this time, that the media have their marching orders and will dutifully skew the American public's opinions in the way that best serves the PTB.

It's so easy!! Baa-a-a-a-a-a

> > > >

Where is that bar graph that shows the "mentions" for each candidate? Says it all!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 02:07 PM
Original message
Exa ctly!! When the results of Iowa were being discussed on the media, all they mentioned was that
Obama won, and Clinton lost. EXCUSE ME!! What about that guy who came in second???

The media is pulling the same shit in New Hampshire. The corporatist media is ignoring Edwards and thereby hoping that all the voters will do the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #76
106. Self-delete. PC burped.
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 02:28 PM by BrklynLiberal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. Dur!
I'm so sick of the fatcats!

"you can choose anyone you want as president, as long as we approve them first!"

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. Edwards will rip them apart! That is why we need him more than ever!
Edited on Tue Jan-08-08 04:52 PM by saracat
We don't need "hope" anymore.We need action and a fighter not a negotiator!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kansas Wyatt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. He's our only chance to....
Put Corporate America back in it's place.... Below 'We The People,' instead of merged with our government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneGrassRoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Precisely why JRE's message that he isn't against business/corporations...
but rather is against corporate greed and corporate influence on Washington needs to start being heard louder and louder. He made that distinction in the last debate.

Shame on President of the US Chamber of Commerce. A lot of small businesses belong to the Chamber.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. They don't intend to make nice, and neither should our Candidate.
Go, Johnny, GO!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. They will pull out all the stops
to keep him from getting elected. That's why I find it so odd that some progressive Dems would consider a corporate friendly candidate like Obama a good choice.

Obama will be so indebted to big businesses that he will end up governing like a Republican, doing whatever they ask for. Obama will know that they "made" him and that they can "break" him.

He'll serve as president about as well as the Dem leadership in Congress fights the GOP - not at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. You are so right!
He'll serve as president about as well as the Dem leadership in Congress fights the GOP - not at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #10
70. Can you imagine if John and Dennis joined up together
oh whew baby the fur would fly wouldn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogmarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. Fuck the C of C and big business, including WalMart!.
Go Edwards!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
judaspriestess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
12. well excuuuuuuse the f*ck out of Edwards for having a populist
message. We the people does not mean shit anymore.

"a cataclysmic fight to the death" doesn't that sound like a vague threat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
23. Since the corporate giants are killing us anyway, we may as well fight back!
Deregulation has brought about more hazards to workers and consumers while sucking the wealth upward to the top .5% even faster than before.

Outsourcing makes us jobless, and insurance-less. Plus, less payroll taxes to support the infrastructure we all use.

To save pennies per item on production, we have poisons in foods and toys.

Wages keep spiraling down while real cost of living goes up up up. To make the numbers look better, they keep adjusting the items indexed.

Ditto cooking the books on real unemployment figures. Just don't count the unfortunate workers whose benefits run out. See! Lower numbers!

Lie about jobs created. Decent job with living wage and benefits lost is NOT made up for by a not-quite full time slave wage job with no benefits. But, they count them the same. See! Higher numbers.

Lower the standards for clean air and water. Oh, and let mega corps buy aquifers up all over the globe.

Pass laws abroad that prohibit subsistence farmers from saving seed. Make them BUY seed for multi-national corporations.

Pass laws that it's OK for Monsanto GM crops to be grown near other crops, then let Monsanto sue farmers out of existence for having their genetic materials in fields without paying.

They have been at war with us for DECADES. Hell, yes, it is bloody well time we hire some leaders who will fight for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HowHasItComeToThis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #23
31. BINGO, DEREGULATION IS JUST ANOTHER WORD FOR LAISSEZ-FAIRE
ROBBER BARONS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #23
46. Thank you. You've done a brilliant job of summing it all up...
and with verve.

You should translate that into an OP. Start a thread (as I'm sure you have before), this can't be heard enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #46
82. Thank you. But when I post OPs, they sink like lead
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 11:20 AM by havocmom
I am the mother who tells people to eat their veggies and take responsibility for what they say/do. Most don't wanna hear it. ;)

edited to add: do visit my journal. I try and keep some of my thoughts there, but I have been so depressed about how people are letting the circus distract lately, I have forgotten to post there lately. I did add that post to it, since you thought well of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 05:46 AM
Response to Reply #23
52. apparently they own the voting machines too
pretty handy for them. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #52
83. Yep. Heard recently on Dobbs' that the only real growth market left in America
would be torches & pitchforks.

The global take-over of governments by corporations is just about done. It IS fascism and we really are at war with it, for our very existence.

I'm a bit like Patrick Henery. Liberty or death. It is a war I shall not live to see completed at my age, but it is one to fight in, with hopes that someday, people will be in charge of their lives again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #23
62. Watch the documentary "The Corporation"
Posted on Youtube.com in 23 chapters. See the links to all the Youtube chapters here:

http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=FA50FBC214A6CE87


About the Film

WINNER OF 26 INTERNATIONAL AWARDS! 10 Audience Choice Awards including the 2004 Sundance Film Festival.

Provoking, witty, stylish and sweepingly informative, THE CORPORATION explores the nature and spectacular rise of the dominant institution of our time. Part film and part movement, The Corporation is transforming audiences and dazzling critics with its insightful and compelling analysis. Taking its status as a legal "person" to the logical conclusion, the film puts the corporation on the psychiatrist's couch to ask "What kind of person is it?" The Corporation includes interviews with 40 corporate insiders and critics - including Noam Chomsky, Naomi Klein, Milton Friedman, Howard Zinn, Vandana Shiva and Michael Moore - plus true confessions, case studies and strategies for change.

http://thecorporation.com/index.cfm?page_id=2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #62
84. Post that advice often and everywhere, JohnyC!
I have been screaming about the corporate take over and coming 'Third World-ization' of America for decades now. I am tired of being Cassandra. Appreciate the help getting people to notice what is being done to them and future generations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #62
121. Excellent documentary ...thanks for the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #23
101. It's easier than that
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 01:17 PM by ProudDad
Don't buy their shit!

Don't spend your money at their big boxes...or their car dealers...or their fast food joints...

Organize with your neighbors to support and re-create your local economy...

Starve the corporate capitalist beast!!!


And for DOG'S SAKE -- don't believe that any of these damn politicians or the corporate owned and managed "electoral" system will do SHIT for you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreepFryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
13. Corporations (thankfully) don't have a vote. These corp. assnozzles have only idle threats.
Edited on Tue Jan-08-08 05:18 PM by FreepFryer
LOVE when greedy douchebags like this guy bare their 'robber baron' souls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. They actually DO have votes.. and the ones they have are the MOST powerful ones
Edited on Tue Jan-08-08 05:41 PM by SoCalDem
They BUY our legislators, who then allow the corporate lobbyists to write legislation that creates the laws WE have to abide by.

their MONEY speaks louder than any of our piddly votes..

the congressman we send to DC, will always need campaign money..more than "we" can afford to pay, so the corporations are always happy to "help out".. They buy legislators of BOTH parties, so they always get their way..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #22
97. Oh, that is so cynical of you.
What they do is send someone who is interested in the process to speak to their representative with a few ideas, conveniently written up in the form of a bill for easy reading, and discuss the possibility of contributing to the community through legislation based on those ideas; then, as a matter of respect for the office, leave a campaign donation with the representative's executive assistant.

Would you call that 'buying' the legislator?

I wouldn't.

It's more like 'renting'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #97
104. or "long-term leasing"
and yes I AM cynical. I have seen too many legislators for too many years, who seem to be interested in the "little people" when they first get elected, but once they get the sticker shock of the cost of remaining in office, they soon toss us to the curb...until they need our votes the next time..

We keep "fighting for" the same things over and over and over, and yet we never seem to get what we all say we want and need.. how is that possible if WE are the ones "in charge"?

It's all so frustrating to look back and to see all those years just wasted..all those promises unkept..and the money thrown down the shithole is beyond comprehension..and we still have no universal health care..our schools are still 2nd rate (some worse)..and we still waste most of our money on our military, so they can stick their noses into everyone else's business..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #13
28. They don't vote. They buy.
Get 500 corporate executives together and get them to each donate 2300/person. You can generate 1,150,000 from that 500. Try getting 500 working class folks to donate that kind of cash. You'd need several hundred to several thousand working class folks to match that kind of buying power. It's more difficult than simply lobbying 500 rich people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #28
35. Exactly. Bingo. Our gov't has been BOUGHT
We have a candidate (or two) that refuses to be bought. Oddly enough, they are the most marginalized ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #28
40. CEOs & Management can dictate the votes of employees.
I know. I've experienced it.

It is all indirect, because to do so directly is illegal, but everybody knows that to advance, you must be a "team player". When the CEO likes Hillary (or Obama) the WORD goes out which TEAM you had better be playing on. The bizarre thing is that most "good team players" give this up voluntarily. :shrug: and become the little career oriented robots that advance. They really don't care who they vote for. Pleasing The Boss and being a team player becomes their identity. The greatest aspiration of most of these people, especially in Middle Management, is to become the perfect Stepford Employee. Donations are made, names are noted, idle conversation monitored.


Not ALL corporations are like this....only MOST of them.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 02:31 AM
Response to Reply #40
49. ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panzerfaust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #40
91. Great Stats

Which indicate that Hill & Bar have strong support from Big Biz

If either wins the nomination, I will still vote for them, as I prefer the illusion of democracy that they would try to preserve, vs the ungloved fist of fascism that the republicans will bring.

Ah yes, The Movement: R.I.P.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #13
47. But HRC appears to have already spiked the punchbowl with her delegates
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conspirator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #13
56. Unfortunately THEY DO. The power of a single rich man's media and campaign funding is bigger
than his single vote. It's worth thousands of votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
14. Yes, it's real and it's deliberate!
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
15. R&K!!! [n\t]
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
weeve Donating Member (427 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
17. I heard earlier on Thom Hartmann
... how Obama made a point of bring the Health Care lobbyists to the table in Illinois, which basically ended up killing any chance for Universal Healthcare in the state.

Edwards is much smarter than to play that game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
18. You got it jsamuel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snotcicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
19. Maybe we found something that will bring all Democrats together
When they threaten one of us, they threaten us all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ninga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
20. I will cancel my membership to the local Chamber tomorrow, and make it known why.
I just sent in $250.00 for membership last week, and I am going to ask for a refund.

The bottom will have to live with what the top has wrought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #20
44. Good for you!
:applause::applause::applause::applause::applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
21. What jobs are they creating?
One of my former lawyer friends is now working for a retail store. She simply can't get a better job. These guys have sat on their hands for seven years. Let's ask them what they have done for Americans since the Bush coup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. Mexican jobs? East Asian jobs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #21
94. Yes indeed.
A law degree is not worth the paper it's printed on anymore. Mine is large, beautifully matted and framed and can be used as a placemat. :)

I know. Too many lawyers and not enough jobs. The Chamber of Commerce can kiss my ass and call me Doctor.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
24. You can't compromise with the Korporatist Klan of AmeriKa!
You simply CAN'T!!!! This is a war that has been declared, and we need to make sure that they LOSE this war and make no mistake that they've been put in a corner we don't want them getting out of after we've won. THEN we'll work with the real diversity of opinions of the different groups of PEOPLE in this country, not the so-called "Korporate people" proxies for this elitist scum that has been tearing our country down for way too long!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
25. "Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never has and it never will."
Frederick Douglass, 1857.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
26. I have been saying this for a year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
29. Unions know how to deal with that.
Unity! Its stop one when you want to take on corporate power. The old community organizer running for President understands that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HowHasItComeToThis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
30. cataclysmic fight to the death? THAT IS WHAT THE STOCK MARKET IS ALREADY DOING
PUNISH THE Chamber of Commerce
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
32. The Chamber of Commerce is the very heart of this kind of shit
I used to think the Chamber of Commerce was just a harmless and somewhat sleepy old-timely center of local boosterism. But that was before I began noticing its name everywhere that awfulness was afoot -- from deregulation, to CAFTA and the Trans-Texas Corridor, to attempts to gut Social Security and Medicare.

I think there have may have been a change in 1997, when Thomas J. Donahue -- the guy cited in the OP -- became its president. Here's what the CoC itself says (and read the fine print closely -- it'll curl your hair):
http://www.uschamber.com/about/management/donohue.htm

Thomas J. Donohue is president and CEO of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Since assuming his position in 1997, Donohue has built the Chamber into a lobbying and political force with expanded influence across the globe. . . .

The Chamber’s lobbyists, policy experts, and communicators have helped secure many legislative victories, including major tax cuts, more sensible workplace and environmental regulations, and increased funding for transportation. The Chamber has advanced the business argument on outsourcing and the need for balance in applying new capital markets and accounting rules, among other issues.

On the international front, the Chamber has become a leader in knocking down trade barriers, winning new free trade agreements, and fighting protectionism both at home and abroad. Under Donohue’s leadership, the Chamber has also emerged as a major player in election politics, helping elect congressional pro-business candidates through financial support and voter activism and turnout generated through the Chamber’s grassroots organization, VoteForBusiness.com.

The National Chamber Litigation Center, the Chamber’s law firm, has become more aggressive in challenging anti-business measures in court, setting a new record for cases entered in each of the last six years and securing 48 court victories in 2006.

The Chamber of Commerce often partners in these matters with the National Association of Manufacturers -- which has had an unsavory reputation since early in the last century, when its first president was Samuel Bush, W's great-grandfather -- and the Business Roundtable. For example:
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Coalition_for_the_Modernization_and_Protection_of_America's_Social_Security

The Coalition for the Modernization and Protection of America's Social Security (COMPASS) is a coalition backing President George W. Bush's plan for private Social Security accounts. The group was formed in 2002 by the Business Roundtable and the National Association of Manufacturers.

"COMPASS is acting as an umbrella group for Washington-based organizations, including the manufacturers association, the National Restaurant Association, the Business Roundtable and the Financial Services Forum, which is a group of chief executive officers of major banks, insurance companies and securities firms," Bloomberg News reported. Other members include companies such as The Boeing Co., Pfizer Inc. and Fidelity Investments.

The Washington Post reports, "The Coalition for the Modernization and Protection of America's Social Security, will conduct a nationwide television and grass-roots pressure campaign costing $15 million to $20 million. COMPASS has hired OnPoint Advocacy to conduct grass-roots lobbying and Apco Worldwide Inc. for public relations. . . .

COMPASS also sponsors Generations Together, a website created in February 2005 by Democracy Data & Communications.

The PR firm mentioned just above, Democracy Data & Communications, is particularly notable for its provision to businesses of a special type of astroturf strategy, which involves setting up websites for various industries and corporations which "guide" employees on how to vote for the benefit of the industry, provide online forms for messages to Congress members, and solicit donation to their PACs.
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Democracy_Data_%26_Communications%2C_LLC_(DDC)

Based on posts left on newsrack blog, Thomas Nephew reported August 22, 2006, that Democracy Data & Communications (DDC) was in the astroturfing business and had been involved "sotto voce in Bush administration P.R. campaigns for its Medicare and 'No Child Left Behind' education initiatives."

In the February 28, 2006, Daily Kos, Mark G. Levey wrote: "Democracy Data & Communcations is a big player in the astroturf community. They host the website for the Grass Roots Roundtable, and they co-chair it with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. The board of directors is a regular Who's Who of American industry. They're a big player at the Public Affairs Council, and they've earned a reputation as the place to go for astroturf campaigns."

Levey first came across DD&C LLC in October 2005, "when they were putting pop-up ads against John Edwards in AOL Instant Messenger. This was for their The Truth About Trial Lawyers site for the November Fund ... a tort-reform astroturf campaign bought and paid for by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. (Yes, the government was running ads against the Democrats. ...) ... A quick google on their name brought up their site, and a May 2004 post by Mark Kleiman on a very similar campaign on behalf of No Child Left Behind."

There is very nasty business afoot here. These guys are already active behind the scenes -- they may be one reason John Edwards can't get traction in the media -- and especially if the GOP loses much of its clout after the 2008 elections, they're going to emerge the principal obstacle to genuine progressive reform. If we don't study up on them and their tactics right now, we are only asking to get blindsided when they role out the heavy guns.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #32
111. Here's how to really insult them....

these people are not true capitalists: they promote socialism for the wealthy fatcats. Worse yet, military socialism like that which preceded Hitler's Germany. They live for government contracts and Republican favoritism. Let's get their attention!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
33. What will Obama do?
Any ideas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
34. This is EXACTLY why we need Edwards!!! (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #34
103. I hate to be the one to break it to you
but the House and Senate will be fully packed with C of C clones...

Edwards would not be allowed to get shit through their gauntlet...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
36. Chamber:"We plan to build a grass-roots business org so strong that when it bites you in the butt,
Edited on Tue Jan-08-08 09:14 PM by avaistheone1
you bleed"said chamber President Tom Donohue said.

The only candidate with a proven record of fighting these monsters is John Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
37. I know the only hope is the actual people
I keep hoping for miracles from them, I guess. Like voting for the only obvious one that actually tells you the reason you don't have health care and that you can't make nice with evil fucking big business. HINT: THEY CARE MORE ABOUT MONEY THAN LIFE

They have ruined this country. George Will calls Edwards a Trotsky-basically a COMMUNIST on ABC. Any threat to the powers that be and they act like it's a REVOLUTION. I fucking wish.

But as usual, Americans are told whom to vote for and they comply. I keep expecting somebody to wake up. But I know it's just a dream for them, and I have to be awake.

And that New Hampshire: SO INDEPENDENT. Is that a code word for Republican and neo-Republican? The Republicans along with much help from the status quo Democrats have ruined this country. McCain and Hillary are not any defintion of independent in my world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connonym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
38. I guess it's up to us to get his name OUT THERE
If you're for Edwards tell people that. Wear a lapel button, slap a sticker on your car, put a sign in your yard. If they're going to pretend he doesn't exist we need to remind the everyone that he's out there and he's on our side. We have to be his advertising and the best way to do that, I think, is to continue to refuse to get involved in the mud slinging, to emphasize the positive change we believe Edwards will bring for middle class America. We can do this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theFrankFactor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
39. The FIRST thing I noticed watching election coverage...
was that it was almost like the hosts were instructed NOT to say Edwards' name unless they absolutely had to. Totally and completely down played. What a crock of sh*t!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #39
71. Hello theFrankFactor... I noticed the same thing!
First of all, welcome to DU! :hi:


On MSNBC for the first two hours I watched, all they showed for results on the Dem side was Clinton and Obama. For republicans they showed all candidates, vote totals, percentages... took two screens of graphics - three candidates on one screen, three candidates on the other.

... but for Dems, one screen, with ONLY two candidates.

:wtf:

:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
41. This guy is just proving Edwards' point.
Edited on Tue Jan-08-08 11:25 PM by drm604
Edwards complains about the amount of political power that big business has and their response is to threaten to flex that power. They don't even try to hide how abusive they are.

What gives them the right to "punish" candidates? What gives them the right to spend tens of millions of dollars to influence the political process rather than letting the people have their say? Just who the hell do they think they are?

They take away people's pensions. They send jobs overseas. They fight vociferously against any kind of meaningful health care reform (indirectly causing the deaths of who knows how many people). They fight against pollution laws. They fight against consumer protection laws. They fight against workers' rights.

Then, when the people threaten to rise up and fight back - oh my, they're being picked on, we need them, how dare we vote against their noble desires. They must punish us wayward children!

Assholes. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Two Americas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
42. watch it folks
Anti-corporate rhetoric will be punished.

"We plan to build a grass-roots business organization so strong that when it bites you in the butt, you bleed," chamber President Tom Donohue said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #42
45. Yep - over 60 million dollars and 3 million member companies can do a lot of damage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bjobotts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
48. FDR stopped an armed revolution and big business treated him like Edwards.
"We must take this country back from these economic royalists" FDR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nikto Donating Member (414 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 05:12 AM
Response to Reply #48
50. ECONOMIC ROYALISTS is a term we need to bring back, bigtime.
Maybe update it to ECONOMIC ROYALTY?

And why don't we use the term ROBBER BARON anymore?

We need to upgrade The Lexicon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patiod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #48
63. But FDR got into office by being "one of them"
He didn't campaign or begin his presidency by presenting the New Deal. Businessmen (bankers, mine owners) thought he was just going to bail them out (sounds familiar).

I've given money to Edwards and I'm still on that bandwagon, but I'm concerned about that he's being shut down and pushed aside because he starts out on an anti-Big-Business footing. But he can't lie and pretend to be one of them, either, so I don't know how we win this one.

(And I emphasize Big, because I've pro-business, just not pro-Corporatist)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #63
74. Are you sure?
I thought he did campaign on his ideas for the New Deal, even though the specifics weren't hashed out until after the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patiod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #74
78. I'm pretty sure he surprised Big Business
but it's not really black-and-white. He surely wasn't a Conservative, but he wasn't exactly all that Liberal either.

The point was, he didn't campaign as an "anti-corporatist" as our boy Edwards is doing.

http://www.nytimes.com/books/98/12/06/specials/davis-fdr2.html

"When he came into office, Roosevelt brought with him no clear-cut program, certainly no intellectual readiness to undertake the Keynesian economic measures that would mark his Presidency. It's even doubtful that he quite understood Keynesianism. (''A second-class intellect,'' said old Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes of Roosevelt, ''but a first-class temperament.'') Roosevelt's social inclinations were, at first, ''profoundly conservative,'' or so at least Mr. Davis judges them, and if by ''conservative'' we mean a wish to shore up the capitalist system when it was in very deep trouble, then I think he is right. Only the shrewder minds in the financial and business establishments, those whom the sociologist C. Wright Mills would call ''the sophisticated conservatives,'' understood that the bitter pills Dr. Roosevelt prescribed had in them a life-preserving medicine. No sooner was he in office than Roosevelt launched his ''Hundred Days,'' a frenzy of activity serving brilliantly to ease public fears but doing rather little to cope with underlying problems. Not so easily could Humpty Dumpty be put together again, and sensing as much, Roosevelt settled for the externals of motion and decisiveness. At least, people said - I remember this from childhood - at least he's doing something."

/I'm not a historian, dammit, just a market researcher!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panzerfaust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #78
95. Yep. And they planned to take him out.

Read "War Is a Racket" by General Smedley Butler. That would have been "El Supremo Butler", had he not been such an unusual man: "I spent 33 years in the Corps, and spent most of my time being a high-class muscle man for Big Business."

Or the book heavily based on it "The Plot to Seize the White House" by Jules Archer.

For a look at the man who should have been recognized as even more of an American Hero (Still, he did win TWO Congressional Medals) than he was, read "Maverick Marine: General Smedley D. Butler and the Contradictions of American Military History" by historian Has Schmidt.

To appreciate another outstanding Marine and incredible person - another person to whom we owe a lot (not because of politics though, purely his military abilities) - take a look at "Marine! The Life of Chesty Puller" by Burke Davis

They don't make'em like these guys any more. Our generals are now suckasses like Powell & Betrayus: And betray us either one of whom would have, in Butler's place.

As it was, Butler turned down the chance to be the first American Dictator - just as Washington turned down the opportunity to be our first King.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patiod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #95
108. I've put the Butler and Archer book on my lists
Thanks for the reccs -- even though I'm a chick (and a Quaker at that), I enjoy well-written military history (read the Trulock biography of Joshua L. Chamberlain this summer)

Butler is a local boy - from West Chester, PA (which I know only because there was a Butler Building at Penn State)

And while we're talking about great Generals and local boys -- Winfield Scott Hancock, from Norristown, PA, was another one of those "don't make 'em like this any more". I've followed his steps on several Civil War battlefields.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #48
100. They hated him for it
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 01:14 PM by ProudDad
but he saved their asses...

Most of the corporate capitalist masters didn't know it but they had no better friend in the 30s and 40s than FDR...

He was and remained probably the cleverest of all of that class.


On edit: the selection of 1932 bears remarkable similarities to the selection of 2008... Hmmmmm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 05:38 AM
Response to Original message
51. Kick ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 06:19 AM
Response to Original message
53. Edwards needs to watch his back. Those bastards play a lethal form of hard ball.
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conspirator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #53
57. If Edwards had a real chance of winning he would have to be more careful than JFK nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nxylas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #57
67. Yup, when they say "a fight to the death"...
...don't assume that it's just a figure of speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #67
85. yup (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pooka Fey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
54. But -- But --- That's not NICE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johncoby2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
59. Our candidate for AG in Texas went after corporations also.
he won 36% of the vote.

Like it or not corporations are part of the county, BUT they do not need to RUN the country.

Edward's talk about death to corporations resognates with the 36% of the voters. But that is it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenfrequed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #59
60. Uhm
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 08:56 AM by kenfrequed
That's friggin Texas.

I don't really see Texas being any more representative of the the nation at large as Massachusets or California. I seriously doubt it was the anti-corporate message that lost him his position, more likely it was his opponents shifting the debate to street crime, drugs, violence, and immigration.

The argument and the fight can still be made against the corporate masters in the ballot box and if they are unwilling to concede defeat I suppose there is always the ammunition box.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #59
75. He also, like Edwards, was the "invisible man" in the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrsBrady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
61. Keep Up the Good Work, John!!!!!!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
INdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
64. What this could really mean
Not only will they fight to the death against Edwards and his message but they will not allow a Democrat to retake the White House....Another stolen election that may not look so obvious when they use those phony poll numbers leading up to the November election..We cannot underestimate their power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #64
86. Naw, check the donations posted upthread

D's & R's matter not, whoever will best carry their water recieves the bounty of the Money Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeStateDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
65. John Edwards is the only true Democrat that will win in November the rest are corporate whores.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mother earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
66. Thanks, jsamuel! This needs to be K & R. This is why we fight!
The greedy corporations are ruining this country & anywhere else they get let into, they are bloodsuckers profiting off the backs of humanity. Yeah, there's a few good ones, but the stink from the majority is sickening & life draining.

K & R for Edwards! Fight these bums, send John money. If he's going to win this it's up to all of us!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
68. Vote for the others/corporate status quo or vote Edwards.
This makes it clear that if you don't vote for Edwards then you are voting for the enemy. Corporations have taken over our country. If you don't vote for Edwards then lets change -we the people to -we the corporations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donkeyotay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #68
107. Yes, government of, by and for the corporations. And while we're at it,
let's adjust the concept of taxation for representation. We're not being represented, so why are we paying taxes? Why do we have a House of Representatives? Let the corporations have their own House with their own representatives. Make it official.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
72. these corporations are more of an enemy to us than terrorists.
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 10:33 AM by alyce douglas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
73. First, Edwards isn't really anti-Corporation - he was was DLC, for Pete's sake.
Second, I have no problem with business - of the Mom & Pop variety that usually drives the Chambers; so, I'm not sure of the Chamber's complaint.

Finally, the "war" on Edwards now is nothing. Were he to get the nomination and the press began really comparing what he says to what he did - and found out he did NOTHING like what he's saying - then the real "war" would begin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlertLurker Donating Member (877 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #73
80. Thank-you for posting this!!!
Progressive Democrats are going to have to wake up at some point. Edwards has never been, IS NOT and will never be a Progressive Democrat. He's a corporate creature no better than Clinton or Obama.

If you honestly think that the $8 million he has gotten from legal firms represents purely personal donations, you are quite obviously deluded. Law Firms take money from their corporate clients and launder it into nice, shiney, clean personal political contributions. This is what they DO. This is how they have behaved for GENERATIONS. Sickening, but true.

Look at the PERCENTAGE of his total contributions that comes from Insurance/Banking/HealtCare/Pharma/Legal/etc...the PERCENTAGES correspond pretty evenly to that of Clinton/Obama...

Look at his relationship with hedge fund management firm Fortress Investments. Do you honestly believe that they paid him $459,000 (+$150,000 in political contributions) to do nothing more than "learn about the industry?" Do you believe that he invested $16 MILLION (half his net worth at the time) WITHOUT KNOWING that they specialized in leveraging sub-prime lenders? This is what Edwards wants you to believe...Actually, I'm sure he would prefer it if you forgot all about it.

Look at his Senate voting record, folks! Pro-WAR, Pro-CORPORATION, Pro-POLICE STATE!!! THAT is ALL you can take to the bank! Why do you think he's NOT RUNNING ON HIS RECORD???

Look at his Health Insurance Plan. I'd like to call it a Health CARE plan, but IT ISN'T. Single Payer, not for profit? In your freaking DREAMS, folks! It's a Health INSURANCE Plan, PERIOD.


On the other hand, he's white, male, Xian and from the South - hence "electable." ECH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rubberducky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
77. As an Edwards supporter, IF he doesn`t win the pres nomination,
I would LOVE to see him as the attorney General.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kajsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
79. Damn straight it's real!

That's why we must fight harder for John to win!

He's not getting any help, just strong opposition from
the MSM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
codjh9 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
81. Much of Corporate America, as my sister-in-law says, needs to 'suck a rock!'...
not to mention that they just don't f-ing GET IT on the environment, labor, growth, etc etc etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
87. Standing alone will not work-
to defeat the corporate stranglehold on this country. One person easily gets knocked down for this policy. In my opinion it would take a whole group of people working together to get this done--and getting in the WH is only the beginning of the story.
Edwards. Kucinich, Clark, and Gore (for example) plus all the other powerful legislators must stand together and collectively work to first win this election by saturating the media. Once in, to even start reversing the damage done to the US, it would take work on civil rights, military, legislative, judicial, infrastructure, envronmental and healthcare fronts, all at once.
We do need a new FDR-- a New Deal for this century. What we need I believe cannot physically be done by one person, they are TOO VULNERABLE. This takes a team--before the election.
Just my thoughts this day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
88. Not a surprise
The bidness lobby has been running things for the last seven years and they've got everything they wanted, from relaxing of media consolidation rules, to rollbacks on consumer protections, to freedom to pollute. This is a declaration of a war that's been ongoing for a while now and you need someone who can fight. While Obama's optimism is refreshing, I think it's also slightly naive and the bidness lobby will (metaphorically) shiv him every time. Hillary (assuming her policies are similar to Bill's) is pro-corporate through and through. You need Churchill, not Chamberlain. Edwards ain't Churchill but he's the only one I think could fight like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flasoapbox Donating Member (80 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #88
89. Business needs to suffer for a while
Fuck their threats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #89
90. Big business, certainly
The mom and pop businesses aren't my concern. That's why I used "bidness", to make the distinction between them and the kind of corporate insider, old-boy-network that effectively runs things right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #90
93. Corporate influence and............
Corporate control and influence is a far greater threat to the American way of life than these so-called "Islamic Fascists". Anyone less than a John Edwards will be a disappointment to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
92. Another choice quote from the LA Times piece

"I'm concerned about anti-corporate and populist rhetoric from candidates for the presidency, members of Congress and the media," he said. "It suggests to us that we have to demonstrate who it is in this society that creates jobs, wealth and benefits -- and who it is that eats them."

Arrogant, lying piece of shit. Without Labor there can be no Capital. There is no compromising with these bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donkeyotay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #92
109. The "anti-corporate" label is a distortion
The problem is not corporations, but that corporations have taken over our representation. We're not anti-corporation, because corporations are groups created to make money, and Edwards isn't recommending a Chinese takeover ala corporate America's good bidness buddies. Edwards is recognizing that ordinary people in this country are suffering because corporations have a stranglehold on political dialog and policy. It is an effort to revitalize the same Constitutional government the Right has been waiving flags about. Edwards is currently leading a populist movement that seeks to restore the people's right to self government.

Also, anyone who thinks the Chamber is benign should consider some of their foreign endeavors such as the Azerbaijan Chamber.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #109
112. Exactly, and I would take it much further...

the big businesses behind all this are against competition. They would prefer to have a select few big monopolies, just as they have dominating the M$M. The Communist Chinese form of corporatism seems to work ideally for them, and they are sneaking it into America. When corporations are indistinguishable from government, the consumer and the average person have no say in the matter. They are dominated by fear-mongering and have to resort to begging for scraps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donkeyotay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #112
115. Exactly. They are no more for capitalism than George is for democracy.
When the GOP got into bed with China, they said China would become more democratic. The opposite has happened: we've become more like them. George, Sr. spent a lot of time in China. As far as I'm concerned the BFEE is just opening up world franchises.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #109
113. Corporations

The corporations do what they do because that's what they're supposed to do, the subverting and control of government is part of the business plan. Corporations are the highest, most efficient form of Capitalism, not an aberration.

To me it doesn't matter so much whether Edwards means what he says or if he would be able to do what he says he wants to do. What matters is that he's saying it, that he's energising the working class against our common enemy. To a degree, Huckabee is doing the same.

Sure hope it gets out of hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donkeyotay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #113
116. That's true. The peeples are not happy. Not happy at all.
For a long time the corporations could consolidate power by confusing the Right into thinking they were on the same side. Now the working class and middle class of this country know that we're going to be fighting for our economic lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
long_green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
96. shades of 1896...
when the Democrats coopted William Jennings Bryan from the Populists as their nominee and the GOP nominated McKinley.
That was the election when bosses told their workers "if Bryan wins, the (factory) gates will not open on Wednesday."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #96
120. Fine. They can go ahead and close the gates in China.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
98. The Only Thing "We The People" Have Is Ourselves.... I've Said It Over & Over
and OVER! And it's going to take something close to a REVOLUTION on our part! WE just can't sit by and be "one" who fights, we need to gather together SOMEHOW to make THE WHORES listen!

I don't know HOW to get it started, but I feel in my bones that IT IS what NEEDS to happen!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
99. Check the Business Section of the paper
I do (and why the FUCK isn't there a LABOR Section in the paper? Rhetorical Question...)...

They're very honest and blatant about their strategies, tactics and political leanings there...

You want to know what your enemies are up to -- check the "business" section...





Come On, Dennis -- re-register Green!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
102. To me, this is about the CORPORATOCRACY,
as John Perkins puts it in, "Confessions of An Economic Hitman," and his latest book on American Empire.

This is about the previously-unheard-of corporate greed of the huge, multinational corporations, which think that they are above leaders, nations, and peoples (and my hubby had that stated to him when he was in the oil and gas industry).

Many of us operate small, family-owned corporations, and these very entities are being attacked by the huge multinationals.

These corporatocracy thinks nothing of destroying entire environments for a buck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nxylas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #102
123. They don't think it, they know it
They ARE above governments and "we, the people" and governments seem only too willing to collude in it. The British comedian Mark Thomas compares them to battered wives loyally standing by their men ("you don't understand, Capitalism's not like this when we're together").
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #123
124. That's great!
HeeHee - I'm laughing in a very ironic way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smokey nj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
105. K&R!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
110. Anti- "business"....

It's a sad day in America when business is equated with corporatism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kansas Wyatt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
114. Go To HELL Corporate America
Just because you have hi-jacked our government, it does not mean you fucking own us!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
117. I had no doubt. Corporacrats ALWAYS HATE Populists.
I'll still cast my vote for the Edwards' because I know where there heart is,...with THE PEOPLE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Krashkopf Donating Member (965 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
118. I agree completely.
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 04:07 PM by Krashkopf
There IS class-warfare going on in the Country RIGHT NOW. And WE, THE PEOPLE, are losing, because our Democratic Party "leadership" is are not FIGHTING BACK hard enough against it.

I support John Edwards, because I think he will be the most tenacious fighter FOR the middle class. As Edwards said

"there is NO common ground between us, and the people who would allow a teenager to die because they put corporate profits over her need for a liver transplant."


Obama needs to be asked - point blank - about his vision for a "Purple America." If he means that he can work with the majority of middle-class Republicans who (whether they know it or not) SHARE OUR ECONOMIC INTERESTS - like the need for affordable, universal health care - that is one thing.

On the other hand, if he means he is going to change things by working with ultra-rich class warriors, like the President of the Chamber of Commerce - "Kumbaya" as you call it - Obama may, indeed, too naive to be President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
119. He will not take their dirty money because he doesn't want to be owned
They will not let him hold the office because he will not play with their dirty money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneGrassRoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
122. Damn, I wish someone could make a commercial about this....
distribute nationwide somehow.

HEY, SYMBOLMAN!!!!!!! CAN YOU DO SOMETHING ABOUT THIS?

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC