This is from a piece I wrote on the general subject of why the Internet must die. I submitted it yesterday and it'll probably show up at
">Online Journal soon, if you care to take a look in the next couple of days.
Anyway, this is how I see this hideous piece of shit. It's in the Senate for a vote sometime soon, I would think, and Bushie's signature is a given. Note the embedded links in the excerpt below and follow them for more background on this issue.
The parallel universeThe only serious competition threatening corporate media's monopoly on official "truths" those pieties designed to narrow acceptable choices and increase social control comes from the Internet.
"The news," as it's laughingly known, can tap into a seemingly endless supply of drunken or felonious fools like Jessica and Paris and OJ and Twitany to sedate its viewers. Then there's the occasional gruesome murder to balance the chirpy happy talk on miraculous medical procedures (which most of us will never live to experience because our for-profit insurers won't cover them), an always erroneous look at local weather, followed by 15 uplifting minutes on sports and a recap of the top celebrity screw-ups. The viewer yawns, feels a bit awed by all this technical wizardry and slick showmanship, and heads for bed thinking he's up to date on the stuff that really matters.
Mainstream media has a bottomless pool of "on-air talent" perfectly coiffed, well-modulated, tastefully made up, arrayed in $5K worth of suits, ties and little flag lapel pins, strident and irritating as a hundred Ross Perots.
We have broadband, YouTube, blogs, forums, actual reporters, search engines, discussion groups, political organizing, access to newspapers published in actual free countries all taking place in plain sight.
Over the past decade Internet and Web technology have matured and surpassed nearly anything mass media can offer. It's instant news, usually with audio or video, often reported by eyewitnesses rather than filtered by some blow-dried idiot. It's preserving what's left of our national heritage by archiving "purged" documents. It's subjecting every significant political, social and economic development to the scrutiny and analysis of the world's collective brainpower. It's the unifying element linking diverse cultures into an evolving planetary society not subordinated to states or lines on a map. And it's the universe's greatest source of jokes, one-liners and satire.
Governments' worst nightmare: an informed and activist citizenryI don't see how the power elites can afford to allow this nonsense to continue for much longer. People with unconventional (read: humanitarian or peaceful) ideas are the implacable enemy of those sustaining their wealth and power by aligning themselves with the status quo, and these dissenting Internet pipsqueaks cannot be tolerated forever.
To our corporate masters, libraries, independent publishers and bookstores are bad enough. But fortunately for "them," libraries are under-funded and ill-attended, it's getting harder to publish unorthodox material in the US and many independent book stores are getting killed by the Barnes & Nobles and Amazons of the world.
Not so the Internet. It's become the alternate universe for hundreds of millions of people worldwide who know and understand that the official story is always and inevitably suspect. That altruism has never been a function of governments. That governments are always at war with "the people" they pretend to watch out for. That, as The Commander Guy pointed out in a rare moment of clarity, dictatorships ARE easier to run than representative democracies. That power exists solely to perpetuate itself and, when threatened, will defend its position with anything and everything in the arsenal.
Now that's a hell of an alternate narrative. And the Internet is the "plumbing" that carries these contrarian messages and the seditious thoughts and attitudes and movements they inspire around the world in less time than it takes Murdoch to count his latest billion.
Death by harassment In July of last year, Bush signed an executive order entitled "
Blocking Property of Certain Persons Who Threaten Stabilization Efforts in Iraq. This expanded the administration's flexible definition of a terrorist to include anyone disagreeing with its "
efforts to promote economic reconstruction and political reform in Iraq or to provide humanitarian assistance to the Iraqi people." This apparently isn't intended as a joke, although I'm not sure that what's going on over there qualifies as "economic reconstruction" or "humanitarian assistance."
But it does dovetail nicely with "
Endgame," as the Department of Homeland Security calls HR 1955 / S 1959, known officially as
The Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007, and which contains among dozens of disgusting provisions these gems:
(2) The promotion of violent radicalization, homegrown terrorism and ideologically based violence exists in the United States and poses a threat to homeland security.
(3) The Internet has aided in facilitating violent radicalization, ideologically based violence, and the homegrown terrorism process in the United States by providing access to broad and constant streams of terrorist-related propaganda to United States citizens.Striking at the heart of the international terrorist menace, this bill targets the dangerous arch-fiends/grandmothers who participate on the hundreds of thousands of political forums, blogs or news and information sites that aren't exclusively devoted to singing the praises of Bush/Cheney and their merry band of imperialist oil pirates.
Note that this piece of repressive legislation rumored to be the brainchild of the Rand Corporation and introduced by Democrat Jane Harman passed the House last October by a 404 6 margin. Note that, introduced last October in the upper house as
S 1959 and co-sponsored by GOP armchair warrior and domestic repression enthusiast Norm Coleman, it's coming up for a vote in the Senate early this year. If it passes, which seems likely, a Bush signature is a given probably with a signing statement that says he'll ignore the act's few feeble provisions to combat totalitarianism, like this one:
(a) In General - The Department of Homeland Security's efforts to prevent ideologically based violence and homegrown terrorism as described herein
shall not violate the constitutional rights, civil rights, or civil liberties of United States citizens or lawful permanent residents.
Readers may want to take appropriate preemptive action before, say, downloading this article becomes a felony.
contact info if you're inclined to beat your head against the wall one more time in the cause of preserving the republic.