|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
RestoreGore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:24 PM Original message |
Edwards supporters: The Huffington Post calls John Edwards a loser and a racist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:26 PM Response to Original message |
1. Yeah. Saw it already. Sometimes I just ignore what's on that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RestoreGore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:28 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Well I sure will respond to it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ihavenobias (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 03:35 PM Response to Reply #3 |
130. Check It Out: Fellow HuffPo Contributor Responds! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ihavenobias (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 03:15 PM Response to Reply #1 |
129. Hold On A Minute: This is NOT reflective of everyone at Huffington Post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1corona4u (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:28 PM Response to Original message |
2. I don't support Edwards, but that's totally unacceptable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Zephyr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:54 PM Response to Reply #2 |
17. I agree. That was a shitty thing for him to write. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UpInArms (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 05:35 PM Response to Reply #2 |
90. that was not journalism and no reasonable person should |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:32 PM Response to Original message |
4. O'Donnell had really hti the bottom with this one, and I respected him on McLaughlin. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RufusTFirefly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 05:02 PM Response to Reply #4 |
81. Respect and McLaughlin? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:36 PM Response to Original message |
5. Well, he 'succeeded' in getting over 7 pages of responses so far. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Time for change (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
6. That's one of the most arrogant stupid articles I've ever seen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
7. This isn't just for Edwards supporters--it's for everyone concerned about how the arrogant, asshole |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:47 PM Response to Original message |
8. Let's hop Olbermann sees this tripe and calls O'Donnell out on it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bullwinkle428 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:49 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. This very article is clearly "Worst Person"-worthy! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:53 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. I just emailed Keith w/nomination for Worst :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
halobeam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 04:31 PM Response to Reply #14 |
61. I'm going to do that too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MzNov (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 04:32 PM Response to Reply #14 |
63. Good idea Catchawave !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jeff In Milwaukee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:48 PM Response to Original message |
9. Utterly breath-taking in its stupidity... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
11. Good rebuttal by Jane Smiley "Shut up Larry" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XOKCowboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:53 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Ya beat me.. Nice slam Jane... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:53 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. Jane Smiley always *always* rocks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milo_Bloom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:56 PM Response to Reply #11 |
21. This lie is still being told? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 04:36 PM Response to Reply #11 |
69. Love her political writings, love her novels. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Connie_Corleone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
12. It's a disgusting article. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XOKCowboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
13. Jane Smiley - Shut Up Larry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:54 PM Response to Reply #13 |
19. She's about 1000 times smarter than Larry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milo_Bloom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:54 PM Response to Original message |
18. Except that he is kinda right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:55 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. What's the delegate count again? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milo_Bloom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:57 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. So you actually believe he can win? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 02:01 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Are you answering my question with a question? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milo_Bloom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 02:05 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Yes, because it answers the initial question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blaze Diem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 02:10 PM Response to Reply #22 |
28. Well its early in the race. And by the way Clinton/Obama are tearing up the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milo_Bloom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 02:22 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. We are not talking about RIGHTS, we are talking about realities. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JHB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 02:39 PM Response to Reply #30 |
34. Spoiler? How? It's not as if someone like Zell Miller or Lieberman will win unless he bows out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milo_Bloom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 03:07 PM Response to Reply #34 |
40. To Some Clinton and/or Obama ARE Zell or Lieberman. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
americanstranger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 04:07 PM Response to Reply #40 |
49. Throwing their vote away? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milo_Bloom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 04:33 PM Response to Reply #49 |
65. The same argument used for Nader |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
americanstranger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 04:40 PM Response to Reply #65 |
72. What, at this point in the game, makes Edwards a 'minor' candidate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milo_Bloom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 04:59 PM Response to Reply #72 |
80. The facts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
americanstranger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 05:13 PM Response to Reply #80 |
83. And of course, this is all cast in stone, and nothing can ever change. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milo_Bloom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 05:19 PM Response to Reply #83 |
84. After 6 years of campaigning... yeah, as far as Edwards is concerned. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
americanstranger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 05:44 PM Response to Reply #84 |
92. All righty then! I'm cancelling my homeowner's insurance! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milo_Bloom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 05:52 PM Response to Reply #92 |
93. Unforseen circumstances won't change Edwards lack of appeal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 04:33 PM Response to Reply #30 |
66. "the fact that he IS a corporatist as much as anyone" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milo_Bloom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 05:20 PM Response to Reply #66 |
85. He took from one corporation and gave to another. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 05:57 PM Response to Reply #85 |
94. ...Limited Liability Partnerships actually. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milo_Bloom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 07:07 PM Response to Reply #94 |
97. Same thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 07:50 PM Response to Reply #97 |
101. Just out of curiosity, have you ever worked towards generating profit for a corporation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milo_Bloom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 08:05 PM Response to Reply #101 |
103. Of course I have... I currently help run 2 different corporations. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 01:49 AM Response to Reply #103 |
115. Then I can only assume that you'll be sitting out the Democratic primaries. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milo_Bloom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 02:41 PM Response to Reply #115 |
125. Of course not, I will be voting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JHB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 02:33 PM Response to Reply #22 |
32. The point is, this is a process to be seen through... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RestoreGore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 02:52 PM Response to Reply #32 |
36. It isn't hard to now see why Al Gore has fallen out of love with politics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneGrassRoot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 02:57 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. Absofuckinlutely agree with EVERY SINGLE WORD YOU SAID! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blaze Diem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 02:56 PM Response to Reply #32 |
38. Why should Edwards leave this Primary race? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JHB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 04:45 PM Response to Reply #38 |
75. Was this to me or the poster I was answering? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blaze Diem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 05:34 PM Response to Reply #75 |
89. No not you JHB. I appreciate your posts..and #32 is correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milo_Bloom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 03:08 PM Response to Reply #32 |
41. So you had no problem with Nader? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JHB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 04:27 PM Response to Reply #41 |
57. No, but I think he's irrelevant to this discussion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milo_Bloom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 04:40 PM Response to Reply #57 |
73. I don't see how he is irrelevant... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JHB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 12:14 PM Response to Reply #73 |
116. Well there we have it then... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milo_Bloom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 02:44 PM Response to Reply #116 |
126. Guess you didn't read what I wrote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JHB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-13-08 01:06 AM Response to Reply #126 |
131. Oh, Crimoney... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milo_Bloom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-13-08 01:56 AM Response to Reply #131 |
133. There is some indication. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
americanstranger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 04:26 PM Response to Reply #22 |
55. That's why they play the games, dude. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grmamo (304 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 04:00 PM Response to Reply #20 |
48. I thought it was - Obama 25, Clinton 24 and Edwards 18 or 19 - only 2 states - it is not over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
americanstranger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 04:16 PM Response to Reply #48 |
52. You're right! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milo_Bloom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 04:28 PM Response to Reply #48 |
58. So after 2/5 when he is far behind in delegates, you think he should drop out? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
americanstranger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 04:32 PM Response to Reply #58 |
64. If he can continue and wishes to, no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JHB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 04:38 PM Response to Reply #58 |
70. Why should he? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milo_Bloom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 04:46 PM Response to Reply #70 |
77. Well, it was the counter to the idea that he is somehow actually close. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JHB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 01:06 PM Response to Reply #77 |
117. I think you can guess my evaluation of O'Donnel's likely accuracy here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milo_Bloom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-13-08 02:02 AM Response to Reply #117 |
134. I think it only makes sense to the 80%+ not voting for Edwards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 01:44 PM Response to Reply #48 |
120. And take a look at THIS: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JHB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 02:07 PM Response to Reply #120 |
123. Do keep in mind that at that point in 1992... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 02:49 PM Response to Reply #18 |
127. There are unanswered questions about Iowa and NH is being recounted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krabigirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
24. What a hack. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RestoreGore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 03:11 PM Response to Reply #24 |
42. I agree wholedheartedly, and... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Misskittycat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 02:06 PM Response to Original message |
26. Jane Hamsher at FireDogLake.com slams it as well, and her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AX10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 02:08 PM Response to Original message |
27. Go to HELL Larry! Edwards has every right to run. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
americanstranger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 02:19 PM Response to Original message |
29. I can't believe the lack of attention this is getting in the blogoshphere. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 04:34 PM Response to Reply #29 |
68. I wish I could say I was surprised it didn't get much coverage. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
31. Sooooo what makes him racist, being southern or being white? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 02:35 PM Response to Original message |
33. My take on this is if Obama would drop out (no I'm not saying he should) Edwards would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 02:40 PM Response to Original message |
35. Although, I still check HP, it has slide into the fluff description of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneGrassRoot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 02:55 PM Response to Original message |
37. Sadly, I've come to think (and this is for fellow Edwards supporters)... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donkeyotay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 04:08 PM Response to Reply #37 |
50. Revving up the $60 million propaganda campaign? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
halobeam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 04:48 PM Response to Reply #37 |
79. oddly enough, it did piss me off to donate twice to him today. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grmamo (304 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 03:19 PM Response to Original message |
43. What a jerk, who is the racist when a white man can not run against a black man or a woman for that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 03:32 PM Response to Original message |
44. Shit on a shingle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoof Hearted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 03:40 PM Response to Original message |
45. As a Hillary supporter I must say that's one of the most idiotic things I've read lately |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seabiscuit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
46. O'Donnell is *not* Huffington Post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RestoreGore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 05:07 PM Response to Reply #46 |
82. So these sites don't vet whose posts go on them? n.t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seabiscuit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 09:24 PM Response to Reply #82 |
106. I don't know why Ariana allowed that piece onto her website, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RestoreGore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 09:50 PM Response to Reply #106 |
107. I'm beginning to think many people aren't what they seem n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marie26 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 03:55 PM Response to Original message |
47. Wow, that's stupid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ZinZen (599 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 04:11 PM Response to Original message |
51. O'Donnell is a Hilllary shill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 06:02 PM Response to Reply #51 |
96. THANK YOU! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonconformist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
53. As opposed to Obama, who has only beat Alan Keyes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jasmine621 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 04:23 PM Response to Original message |
54. Arianna is such a HC hater, this stance puzzles me? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greylyn58 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 04:27 PM Response to Original message |
56. Wow! I just don't know where to begin.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marnieworld (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
59. Lawrence O'Donnell jumped the shark for me when he dyed his white hair red recently |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
americanstranger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 04:34 PM Response to Reply #59 |
67. Must have been Red Dye No. 3... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XOKCowboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 04:30 PM Response to Original message |
60. I sometimes post when I'm a little inebriated... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MzNov (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 04:31 PM Response to Original message |
62. Wow. This is one of the most anti-candidate pieces I've seen so far. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 04:40 PM Response to Original message |
71. Ariana's not real keen on populism either. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 04:44 PM Response to Original message |
74. Hilariously wrong headed opinion piece... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
judaspriestess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 04:45 PM Response to Original message |
76. Wow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 04:47 PM Response to Original message |
78. y'know, I/ve been worried about this sort of thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MagickMuffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 05:21 PM Response to Original message |
86. Wow, Did Larry write this at a Bar while drinking with his buddies? Cocktail Weenie Eater |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 05:21 PM Response to Original message |
87. Thanks, but I am a progressive democrat, not a communist seeking a dictator |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 05:22 PM Response to Original message |
88. Any candidate who wants to beat Obama is racist. This beats anything the hillheads ever pulled. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissDeeds (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 05:41 PM Response to Original message |
91. O'Donnell's a frequent guest on Olbermann |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 05:59 PM Response to Original message |
95. Where was his sarcasm tag after all that bullshit? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kajsa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 07:11 PM Response to Original message |
98. What an idiot! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OwnedByFerrets (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 07:11 PM Response to Original message |
99. FUCK YOU O'D |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pmorlan1 (763 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 07:41 PM Response to Original message |
100. O'Donnell Is Not The Only One |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 07:52 PM Response to Original message |
102. Not the biggest Edwards fan at the moment but that's over the top |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
natrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 08:15 PM Response to Original message |
104. hufpo is pathetically full of themselves-FUCK fluffpo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AzDar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 08:18 PM Response to Original message |
105. So JRE should 'drop out' to 'get out of the way of a black man'? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RestoreGore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 09:51 PM Response to Reply #105 |
108. Yep. 48 STATES TO GO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-13-08 01:09 AM Response to Reply #105 |
132. Exactly! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynatnite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 09:56 PM Response to Original message |
109. It wasn't HuffPo...it was Lawrence O'Donnell... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DianaForRussFeingold (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 10:33 PM Response to Original message |
110. The Huffington Post ,,,corporate media owned ?......or what ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SmellsLikeDeanSpirit (471 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 10:35 PM Response to Original message |
111. Fuck O'Donnell. That's all that really needed to be said in this thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mnhtnbb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 11:14 PM Response to Reply #111 |
112. Agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Elidor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 11:18 PM Response to Original message |
113. Good god, that's awful |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
debbierlus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 11:32 PM Response to Original message |
114. The last sentence says it: White Male Monopoly - the Race Card |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kurth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 01:10 PM Response to Original message |
118. Lawrence O'Donnell: Eat Shit And Die. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kelligesq (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 01:25 PM Response to Original message |
119. MSM tryiing to force their choices on us - Edwards most acceptable natiownide & they dont like it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
surfermaw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
121. I BEG your Pardon...they would not split evenly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JHB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 02:11 PM Response to Reply #121 |
124. So what would be the split and why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beelzebud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
122. I didn't expect this from O'Donnell... I guess he's just an idiot like most pundits... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tokenlib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
128. What a stupid posting by O'Donnell... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 16th 2024, 12:24 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC