Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Update on Sea Shepherd crew members detained by Japanese Whaling Ship

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Annces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 06:35 PM
Original message
Update on Sea Shepherd crew members detained by Japanese Whaling Ship



               
Benjamin Potts, Australia       Giles Lane, Britain.



The captain of a Japanese ship is refusing to release two anti-whaling activists who have "illegally" boarded his boat, the Japanese Government says. Australian Benjamin Potts, 28, and Giles Lane, 35, a Briton, were detained yesterday after climbing aboard the moving whaling catcher boat the Yushin Maru No.2 in the Antarctic. Australian Foreign Minister Stephen Smith says the Japanese Government instructed the vessel to let the men go.

But Yasuaki Sasaki, the ship's captain, won't release the men until the safety of his vessel is guaranteed. "Immediately that Paul Watson (the leader of anti-whaling organisation Sea Shepherd) has accepted the conditions of the safety of the Japanese vessel, they will release the two illegal intruders," the chief of the whaling section of The Fisheries Agency of Japan, Hideki Moronuki, said.


Mr Moronuki said he knew nothing about comments by Foreign Affairs Minister Stephen Smith that the Japanese Government said late last night that the two men would be released.
Foreign Affairs Minister Stephen Smith told Sky News he sought and received assurances from the Japanese Government that the two men would be released, but as of this morning that had yet to happen.


http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/news/national/japan-holding-activists-for-now/2008/01/16/1200419836438.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. this is why you dont board a ship after you threaten to ram them
be safe Sea Shepherd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. Whalers are scared to death of Sea Shepherd.
Good.

Of course, those two SSCS volunteers better be kept real safe. Probably a BIG liability issue if something happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Annces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Ya
they don't understand the concept of activism in Japan apparently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zywiec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I think they understand it completely
Now they can travel freely while holding their "guests"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Not likely.
Those two activists being held hostage won't keep that ship safe.

If I were one of the hostages, I'd still expect Watson to do whatever was needed to keep the ship from whaling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Yes, terrified. Clearly.
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. hmmmmmpf.
not aware of what the japanese minister said? -- yeah right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. Sounds Fair.
Not sure why 'illegal' is in quotes though. Pretty clear that their boarding was illegal (regardless of whether or not the whaling in and of itself, was illegal).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Actually, if you are preventing the commission of a crime, you may enjoy a privilege that would
excuse what would otherwise be potentially criminal conduct. The law will not blind itself to the circumstances under which you take action. For example, if you were about to shoot someone, or abuse an animal, and I forcibly restrained you, I may be able to assert a defense against prosecution for what may otherwise be assault or battery.

I found this rather handy, albeit a bit simplistic:

http://www.ehow.com/how_2140180_plead-prevention-crime-defense-assault.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC