Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kucinich: The Best Positions by far. So why are they trying to bar him?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:13 PM
Original message
Kucinich: The Best Positions by far. So why are they trying to bar him?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/blake-fleetwood/kucinich-the-best-positi_b_81663.html

Kucinich: The Best Positions by far. So why are they trying to bar him?
Posted January 15, 2008 | 05:16 PM (EST)


<snip>

Dennis Kucinich is the only Democrat running for President who has voted against authorizing the war in Iraq and against funding its continuation and who wants to remove all the troops immediately.

Dennis Kucinich is the only candidate for President with a plan for a Universal, Single-Payer, Not-for-Profit health care system. Health care in the US is too expensive and leaves 46 million Americans without insurance and millions more under-insured, causing thousands to die needlessly.

Dennis Kucinich is the only candidate who is not beholden to the corporate interests, who has taken no monies from corporate lobbyists.

Kucinich is the only candidate who voted against the Patriot Act, and wants to restore basic constitutional rights.

Kucinich is the only candidate who supports gay marriage.

This isn't far left stuff. They are simply moderate Democratic positions. This is what the Democratic Party is all about. So why won't the Democrats vote like Democrats?

The reason is that they fear that if they support Democratic positions, they will give the election to the Republicans. They want to settle for the "good" rather than the "perfect."

What is outrageous is that Kucinich is being marginalized and excluded from the debates and media attention .... right at the beginning.

..more..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. you answered your own question in the title
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. yes
when the best positions and policies are the very reasons a candidate is excluded, ridiculed and harnessed to the "unelectable" millstone, you know we are screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
26. Well, like, duuuhhhh n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. corporate Obamahillary doesn't like it, and Dennis will say "impeach" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. I totally agree and it is driving me crazy. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midlife_mo_Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. Better question - why are they ignoring Edwards?
It's pretty easy to see why they are ignoring and barring Kucinich - aside from his politics - he's not really running a campaign!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Desertrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Because they've already given us the 2 to choose from.
Edited on Tue Jan-15-08 07:19 PM by Desertrose
Sheesh...whatd'ya need another one or two candidates for?
Take yer choice...Hil or Barak.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. -
Hi DR!!!

:loveya:
:hug:
:-)
:loveya:
:hug:
:loveya:
:hug:
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Desertrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #12
23. Hi sweet stuff.
:loveya:G_j
:hug:
:loveya:
:hug:
:loveya:
:hug:
:loveya:
:hug:


but a :grr:about this whole stupid debate! I am just so :grr:

but I always :loveya: you. ;)
DR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. Even better question: why is Edwards ignoring Kucinich's muzzling?
I expect it from Clinton, but Obama and especially Edwards are disappointing me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Congress Donating Member (154 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. Edwards suggested eliminating Kucinich
He is not the 'progressive' candidate that some think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. Edwards is getting a very small taste
of what DK always faces. It's not very democratic, is it?

I think that this primary has made it clear: it's not "electablility." It's not poll numbers. It's not how much money a candidate raises. A candidate that bucks the status quo is going to be undercut at every turn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
20. For the same reason the LEADING impeachment question was left out of the google debates!

When CNN was trying to manipulate all of us into thinking they were providing us a show that WE somehow controlled in any way!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #4
27. They invited Kucinich because they wanted Richardson, who often polled lower
--than Kucinich. They didn't change their minds until Richardson dropped out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. DK is anti-corporatocracy
Haven't you noticed the venom coming from DLC supporters here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. Because he is a genuine democrat, and the media is owned by RW
corporations that believe in corporate controlled fascist government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. That's an easy question to answer
if they allowed him to speak freely he might win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
10. Just like the media has no use for Edwards. They are both against the corporations. They DO NOT
want either of them to be the nominee or have a voice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xiamiam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
11. media wont let us choose for ourselves..we are soo stupid..nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
13. another question: why does he do so badly in the polls and in the primaries?
Over the past nine months, DK has participated in around 16 debates, including a couple in NH and a couple in Iowa. Yet, both in those states and nationally, he continues to barely register. Is there any evidence that he has ever gotten a "bump" from his participation in any of the debates in either the national polls or in the polls for the state in which the debate was held?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superkia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
14. The amazing part is how many sheeple have also barred him...
from their minds because the media decided that his issues shouldn't be heard, it could cause Americans to wake up to the shit thats taking place in the elites country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerncrone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
16. For that very reason. DK MUST BE SILENCED!
Corpworld cannot afford for DK's message to get out to AVG JOE, because they would vote for him!

He and Edwards are candidates they must silence. They have been quite successful in silencing DK. They are shutting JE out of reporting every chance they get. It's all about the Corpwhores. They are the only ones who will get REAL press.

It is very telling how fearful Corpworld is of DK by the lengths MSNBC is going to to eliminate him from a debate that they already invited him to attend. A debate that he qualified for based on MSNBC's own criteria!

Why go to such lengths to exclude him? What's the big deal? Why would they enlist the amount of $, time, legal resources & risk bad press to exclude him? If you think about it, there is no other reason.

OUR COUNTRY OFFICIALLY SUX!!!!!:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
17. Because they can't beat him on the issues.
They can't even come close. The only way to beat him is to keep him marginalized.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
19. Since 2000, all truthtellers and peacemakers are ignored and shut out....
It's an epidemic....they become marginalized and ignored...by design...

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Congress Donating Member (154 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
22. I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore
We need to replace Congress, with Kucinich supporters and Constitution defenders.
Imagine a Congress full of people who took their oath of office seriously, who valued themselves as a public servant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
24. FEAR FACTOR! Asking "uncomfortable questions" makes one an OUTSIDER"
a pariah...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
25. To paraphrase the Rutles, he upsets the apple cart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
28. That's why n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
29. Michigan Results: Uncommitted - 40%, Kucinich - 4%
Maybe MSNBC isn't the only one who doesn't consider him to be a serious candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Highway61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
30. He is a danger
to the corporate powers that be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC