Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sheehan Tries To Deliver Nancy Pelosi Letters from 8,000 People Asking for Impeachment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:24 AM
Original message
Sheehan Tries To Deliver Nancy Pelosi Letters from 8,000 People Asking for Impeachment
Edited on Wed Jan-16-08 09:27 AM by babylonsister
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/30159

Cindy Sheehan Hands Nancy Pelosi Letters from 8,000 People Asking for Impeachment
Submitted by davidswanson on Wed, 2008-01-16 13:04. Cindy Sheehan | Impeachment

By Donna Norton, Sonoma County PDA

This Is What Happened--And It's Disturbing

The event was very low-key and "normal." On Monday, January 14th, Cindy Sheehan brought the impeachment letters (over 8,000) she had collected in 8 or 9 large bins and displayed them symbolically on a table in front of the Federal Building in San Francisco. There wasn't much going on, only a few people entering the building. Cindy's table was to the side and away from the door, nothing was blocked or being disturbed. There were a few people with signs, some non-MSM media, and I don't know, maybe 30 people had come for presenting the letters and petitions. It was a week-day morning, so most people were at work. Cindy, Cynthia McKinney, and a few other local officials and figures spoke. (Let me emphasize, it was NOT rowdy, disruptive, or disorderly IN ANY WAY. Could have been a Chamber of Commerce group holding a press conference to announce their presentation of an award to a government official.)

I don't know the details concerning the arrangements with Pelosi's office, as I just got a call the evening before to see if our Sonoma County PDA impeachment group would like to join Cindy and bring our petitions (3,000) for presentation. The arrangement seemed to be that a staff member from Pelosi's office would either come out to officially accept the documents, or would accept them in the lobby. This was fine-- citizens (over 11,000) presenting their wishes to their representatives. No one planned or expected to "storm" the building, take over anyone's office, or make a scene. Just formally transfer the citizens' documents. The call came that a staff member was on the way down to accept the letters and petitions in the lobby.

We picked up the bins and began to enter the building. Other people were entering with no problem. (It was the normal security routine--take off your shoes, remove all metal objects, and present your ID.) When our group began to enter, we were barred. We could load the bins onto the conveyer, but that was it. We were told "demonstrators" and "protesters" were not allowed in the building. Of course we questioned this. I questioned it! Nothing loud or disruptive, just trying to grasp the message. No further or more detailed explanation was forthcoming. I noticed that almost immediately a few police or security officers appeared. So we were forced to abandon the bins, now just sitting there on the other side of the glass, and walk away. (As I say, the intent was NOT to create a distruptive "demonstration"--which almost certainly would have been negatively exploited by the MSM.)

It left me with some extremely disturbing thoughts as a citizen. Basically, citizens who DISAGREE are excluded from the process of THIS government. It's no longer OUR government, as we've been excluded. If we DISSENT (offer an opposing view), we're labeled and perceived as DANGEROUS. You can see where this framing leads.

It's time those who haven't been paying attention realize how deep this framing goes in remaking America.

How healthy is a government that suppresses dissent--that labels it as dangerous? As a nation we've always considered governments that suppress dissent as dangerous and anti-democratic. Our perceptions have been correct--suppressing dissent is a threat to democracy. It makes no difference if it's practiced "over there" or here. So what's led us to embrace the policies we've opposed and defined as anti-democratic? The phrase, "9/11 changed everything," comes to mind. Dramatic changes in government policies and laws have indeed taken place since we adopted this phrase as the frame for those changes. It's provided a vehicle of fear to steer us away from our inherent democratic moorings. 9/11 is our new historical anchor-point. It's used as a reference to remake us into what we've steadfastly rejected as a people. But 9/ll is simply a point in the longer history of this nation. This nation's much deeper roots go back to our Constitution and the principles it embodies. Dissent and open debate are not suppressed in that document, they're protected as critical elements of a democracy.

The citizens gathered at the Federal Building in San Francisco were "dissenters" in resisting the new framing of 9/11 that's remaking their government. They were presenting documents demonstrating support for our Constitutional anchor--urging support for impeachment of those who have undermined it.

It's interesting that supporting the Constitution is considered unwelcome and threatening to our post-9/11 government; that those supporting the Constitution have become the "dissenters"; and, that dissent is being suppressed as a matter of policy. Is this the new America we've bought into?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. this is getting to prevalent in our society now, dissent is
viewed as dangerous, we are marching towards fascism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RuleOfNah Donating Member (603 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. Dissent is sexy.
It's the new dangerous, with extra intellect!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. As I stated yesterday... all these laws puported to thwart 'terrorism' are actually
intended for We, the People, because the government considers US the terrorists.

It's probably too late now, what with all the "anti-terrorism" legislation that has been passed, for us to reverse the process.

Welcome to the United Police States of 'Murika. Grab an orange jumpsuit and remove your shoes at the door.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. My daughter was told not to talk about how she feels in public
she is in 5th grade!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. Who told her that? This sure isn't the world I grew up in. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. nope, me neither... it is much worse now
if the wrong ears hear you say something against the government, you could be getting an unfriendly visit from any number of agencies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #7
18. oh my, that is horrible, again, what's happening right now
do we really want this for our children??? to watch out what they say or wear? this is very bad, and we must put an end to this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. you are prob. right--No one will be able to undo what has been already done in the name of 'nat.
security"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. yep, unfortunately, one of the most common traits of any bureaucracy is that
it's easier to implement something than to remove it. Once implemented, it simply changes shape (read: moves to a different department) when an attempt is made to eradicate it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneGrassRoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. It is time for a revolution, people...
it's dangerous to give up or not see the threat (i.e. what others call conspiracy theorists), IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. REC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mntleo2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
5. I Wish She Could Deliver Them To Wexmen Instead
Pelosi is showing herself to be a tool. She refuses to acknowledge WE The People. I am glad Cindy is also running against her.

Cat In Seattle

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
6. There are actually 2 big stories here--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
9. Sue them.
Citizens of this country have the right of access to those public buildings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
10. K & R
This makes me sick to my stomach. It's just unacceptable. Does anyone know what happened to the petitions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
11. Since when are citizens legally barred from
public buildings like this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. That would be illegally barred.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
12. And you know they threw all those things in the garbage
And next time, they are likely to arrest you for being a terrorist and throw away the key. How long before we have people "disappeared" here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. it's already happening here... it just hasn't sunk in yet...
I've seen many people (including here on DU) who think that as long as their door isn't the one being kicked in, then it's not happening.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
19. this regime we have just wants slaves to keep their mouths shut
and go to work, earn a measly paycheck and to suffer the consequences. I hate these people who have done this to our country, and we need to stand up and take it back. Fuck them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snarkturian Clone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
21. yeah thanks sheehan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warren pease Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Meaning what, exactly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC