Do you think that there is a correlation between the complicity of Congress

to the endorsements that are being made?
For some reason, everyone really wants to play along to get along. Nobody wants to unmask this creature that is the Bush Presidency.
We have hearings without any meaningful results, impeachment off the table, subpoenas that have no enforcement, Contempt of Congress that goes unchecked, bills passed that shouldn't have ever gone to the floor, Bills being held by republicans honored while bills being held by Democrats are not honored...WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON?
Are the endorsements just endorsing the status quo? A code word to the powers that be that their secrets are safe with them...as long as they vote for the candidate that is being endorsed?
I'm getting a sinking feeling in the pit of my stomach that there will be no changes, no convictions, no trials...just business as usual when Congress starts up again in 2009. It's not going to go away anytime soon.

The fix is in and we the people are fucked.

We let slip for too long.

There is definitely a disconnect between the damage that Bush has done and the inaction on the behalf of the Democratic Party Members in Congress.

Edwards is the only viable candidate willing to 'break the system' and shake up the power-sharing in Washington --and that likely explains why there is an active coalition of characters working hard against him.

the oligarchy and their corporations have utterly subverted our political system.

hostage by the Corps. and unable to get his message out. My guess is that They would do that to any other "real candidate for change' as well.

I do not include him as a major candidate.

GE has chosen on behalf of the oligarchy. GE has spoken on behalf of the oligarchy.

and we know that Clintons didn't go after Iran-Contra/BCCI..and Obama seems to be focused on the "future" rather than the past.

accountable, which is a cryin' shame.