Final Exit Polls: Adjusted to Match the Recorded Vote ( TIA ) x

...
It is pretty easy to look around and determine that not many political scientists are expressing agreement with these views. But why not? It could be that political scientists have a status quo bias and/or are afraid to rock the boat by confronting unpleasant truths; perhaps some are even paid by Karl Rove. It could be that political scientists simply haven't looked at the evidence. It could be that political scientists see gaping holes in TIA's arguments. It could be some combination of those factors, and others besides. For what it's worth, I will explain at some length why I don't agree with TIA's views. ...

• How do they account for his 3 million vote “mandate”?
• How do they explain where Bush found 16 million new voters which were added to his 2000 total (net of voter mortality and turnout)?
• What are their confirming demographics?
• Do any of the analysts you refer to have degrees in mathematics or statistics?
• Did their 2004 projections match the exit polls? Or did they match the vote miscount?
• Have any of them ever written about or considered election fraud in their analysis?
• Have they analyzed the impact of uncounted votes on election results?
• What is their track record? Were their projections based on economic or political factors, or did they use state and national polling? What was the time period between Election Day and their final projections?
  …
  
  from: A TruthIsAll (TIA) FAQ