Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The new Dodge Ram truck gets "get-out-of-the-way" front end styling

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 11:08 AM
Original message
The new Dodge Ram truck gets "get-out-of-the-way" front end styling
and will offer a new 5.7-liter Hemi V8 good for 380-horsepower and 404 lb-ft of torque. ...........

2009 Ford and Dodge trucks -- Bad Timing?

By Ron Amadon, MarketWatch
Last Update: 9:00 AM ET Jan 19, 2008

.........

The Ram continues its "get-out-of-the-way" front end styling, as Dodge puts it. But the headlights are more swept back into the fenders than before. In the Crew Cab, there will be lockable, illuminated, and drainable storage binds built into the bed rails. Proving that Dodge has its priorities straight, it says the RamBox bins hold up to 10 cases of 12-ounce beverages.

Dodge tells us buckaroos that it will offer its first Crew Cab, and a new 5.7-liter Hemi V8 good for 380-horsepower and 404 lb-ft of torque. It claims fuel efficiency will be up about 4% and zero to sixty can be achieved in under 7 seconds. Other options, power-wise, include a 210-horsepower six and a 310-horsepower 4.7-liter V8. Like Ford, a diesel is coming.

http://custom.marketwatch.com/custom/myway-com/news-story.asp?guid={FDC9E938-57F5-4B19-B8ED-B8128828A43A}

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. fuel efficiency up 4%
WOW Big Whoop....From 10 MPG to 10.4 MPG. That will show them gas station rip offs...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bronxiteforever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. Unbelievable-The US is in the lead for the Darwin Award for Nations.
Edited on Sat Jan-19-08 11:24 AM by bronxiteforever
A huge waste of gas, taxes for highway also bad environmental impact etc-meanwhile supports oil dependency from our real Jihad friends in the "Kingdom"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. Ugly truck
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. That truck looks like it's going through puberty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. "snort" Indeed it does! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
5. I wonder how well it would sell if they changed it's name to the Dodge Creampuff or Wienie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
7. And then wait for the predictable automaker whining
"Waaaah! Nobody's buying these overpriced behemoths! Toyota, Honda, Mitsubishi, and Yugo are all kicking our asses! Give us more subsidies!"

And like show ponies, you never see these things on a job, doing actual work. But you do get to see the grill up close and personal in your rear-view mirror on city streets and interstate highways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuckessee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
8. A pair of truck balls & that sucker's ready to go!
Yeeehaaa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
9. I thought you meant it had one of these decals


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
10. I have driven one of them before
Edited on Sat Jan-19-08 11:40 AM by NNN0LHI
Got to keep the stereo turned way down or you don't hear or know the rear tires are breaking loose unless you happen to notice the speedometer is indicating you are going a hundred miles an hour when you are actually just barely creeping forward.

Can't be lackadaisical while driving one. Thats for sure.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. The worse time to introduce new models since Ford introduced the Edsel in the fall of 1957
Edited on Sat Jan-19-08 12:44 PM by happyslug
The Fall of 1957 was also the start of the worse recession between the Great Depression and Reagan's 1981 Recession. Into this recession three new cars were introduced, the Rambler (The Rambler was just re-designed in 1957, it had been on the market since 1950, it was a compact car) the Edsel (the Edsel was NOT only a whole new car but a new Car division for Ford) and a new version of the Chrysler's DeSoto (Like the Rambler just a whole new design, but of "Mid-Size" car like the Edsel not a Compact). By 1961 both the Edsel and the DeSoto was finished but the Rambler was a run away success. This just confirmed the old adage, Compact cars ALWAYS do better in Recessions, large cars sales always FALL during Recessions. Thus during a Recession you introduce compact or smaller cars and hold back full size cars till after the recession is long over.

More on the Rambler:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rambler_%28automobile%29

More on the Edsel:
http://www.edsel.com/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edsel

From the Wikipedia Edsel Article:
One of the external forces working against the Edsel that Ford had no control over was the onset of the recession in late 1957.

When the Edsel was in its planning stages in the early and mid-1950s, the American economy was robust and growing. However, in the years that spanned the planning to its introduction, an economic recession hit, and American consumers not only shifted their idea of what an ideal car should be; in prior economic downturns, buyers flocked to the lower price marques like Plymouth, Chevrolet, and Ford. But in 1958, even these cars were perceived by some as unnecessarily large, and while the compact Rambler saw itself shoot to the third best selling make, none of the Big Three had anything compact to sell except their European cars built for Vauxhall, Simca, and Opel. The compacts introduced by the Big Three in 1960 were the direct result of the recession of 1958.


The DeSoto:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DeSoto_%28automobile%29

One last comment, when Mitt Romney's father was asked about the success of the Rambler as he was head of AMC, he called it a combination of skill and luck that permitted him to make AMC a Success. Romney resigned to become Governor of Michigan and his successor moved AMC in larger car production ending the Rambler by the late 1960s (and also took over Kaiser-Jeep which what kept AMC alive during the 1970s and 1980s till Chrysler took them over in the early 1990s).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC