Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mother loses custody of son due to service in National Guard

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 08:51 PM
Original message
Mother loses custody of son due to service in National Guard
"Tanya Towne says she lost everything in Iraq, starting with physical custody of her first child. Before Towne's 2004 deployment, a Montgomery County Family Court judge gave her son, Derrell Diffin, to her first husband because she was being sent to war. This month, Towne lost an appeal to get Derrell back.

The decision has devastated Towne, a specialist and radio repairer with the New York Army National Guard's Rainbow Division in Troy. It's also put her at the center of a legal battle that at least one lawyer who assists service personnel says will force future troops to choose between their families and service to the country.

"This decision marks a serious attack on our national security and the civil rights of military members," said Gregory Rinckey, who defended military personnel as a captain in the Army Judge Advocate General's Corps and now practices military and family law in Colonie. "Soldiers fighting in Iraq should not be burdened with worry that their children will be taken away because of their service."

Yet that's exactly what happened to Towne, who even the Appellate Division acknowledged in its ruling would likely have retained control of Derrell had it not been for her 18-month activation.

There's a growing national trend in which U.S. soldiers say they are losing custody of their children in family courts just because of their absences while on active military duty, according to the Poynter Institute, a Florida-based journalism think tank. On many occasions, courts -- looking to establish a stable environment for the child -- have said it's in the best interest of children not to be moved again, especially if there's a chance the parent in the military could be deployed again..."

http://timesunion.com/AspStories/story.asp?storyID=655899&category=REGIONOTHER&BCCode=HOME&newsdate=1/17/2008&TextPage=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. You would think they would get hardship waivers or some such thing. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. "Family Values" my *ss.
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Suich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. No kidding! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is not new.
In 1981 the AF changed the criteria for child care support options for active duty from three alternative, ready at a moment, can get the kid within 24 hours and keep them for as long as necessary to SIX alternatives. Pretty much impossible to meet those criteria.

I was told that I could give my child up for adoption, give up permanent custody to a family member, or get out. I got out. Many single parents did. Mostly women, because women were the majority of single parents at that point in time.

In 1985 (86?) the AF Reserves made the same change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 03:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC