Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Would you drink toilet water?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 10:53 AM
Original message
Would you drink toilet water?




FOUNTAIN VALLEY, Calif. -- State health and regional water quality officials signed off Thursday on the start-up of a purification system that will turn highly treated sewage into tap water, a water district spokesman said.

Approval for the $490 million Groundwater Replenishment System came from the California Department of Public Health and the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, Ron Wildermuth of the Orange County Water District said.

The system, which has been under construction for nearly four years and was developed by the Orange County water and sanitation districts, will initially inject some 35 million gallons a day into an expanded seawater barrier to prevent ocean water from contaminating the groundwater supply, Wildermuth said.

Later, after another approval by the state Department of Public Health, another 35 million gallons will be pumped to the water district's spreading basins in Anaheim, where it will mix with Santa Ana River water and other imported sources and percolate into the groundwater basin to be drawn on for tap water, Wildermuth said.

http://www.knbc.com/news/15078468/detail.html



Orange County, CA has opened what is likely the largest sewage purification plant for drinking water in the world. The community is on board, and the idea is already being copied elsewhere in the U.S. and abroad. Living on Earth’s Ingrid Lobet reports.

http://www.loe.org/shows/segments.htm?programID=08-P13-00003&segmentID=5




By Dan Weikel, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer

As a hedge against water shortages and population growth, Orange County has begun operating the world's largest, most modern reclamation plant -- a facility that can turn 70 million gallons of treated sewage into drinking water every day.


http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-reclaim2jan02,1,732425.story?coll=la-headlines-california
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. If the scientific process works, why not? Or aquarium water...
Edited on Sun Jan-20-08 10:55 AM by HypnoToad
It's freshwater, made purified by carbon and other chemicals... including the ammonia remover crystals...

I'd prefer seawater removed of salt, but clean water is what counts in the end. Just preferably not fron the end, but whatever...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. People in Paradise Valley AZ would be glad to drink that this a.m.
Their well has been contaminated with TCE.... mmmmmm. cancer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. Only if I didn't know I was drinking it......Gross me out the door!
:puke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catch22Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yes, if it's clean water, it's clean water.
I'd rather not think about what it was BEFORE it was clean water, but whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. I'd drink Brawndo
It's got electrolytes!

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFriendlyAnarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
20. It's what plants crave!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ishoutandscream2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
53. "Water? You mean, out of the toilet?"
Another Idiocracy fan here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dorian Gray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
64. We really are
an idiocracy! :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
69. Idiocracy grows in stature with every passing month, doesn't it?
Wonder if a Director's Cut will ever emerge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. With drought conditions in much of the country and global warming, and
people like my neighbor who water their lawns in the early a.m. and in the evening, we will shortly have no choice.

And as previously stated, if it can be purified to the point of being safe, it's a moot point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kermitt Gribble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
7. I had a friend once
who unknowingly drank a glass of toilet water that another friend had filled for him while we were playing eukre one night. He said it was the best glass of water he'd ever had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. OMFG
:puke:

Note to self, don't invite people over to play cards. lol

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
live love laugh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
57. When I was a child, I played a trick on a family friend and gave him toilet water
My sister and I watched with fiendish glee as he drank the water. He loved it, too.

*slapping my own hand* BAD Me!!!! :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
8. If you think that mother nature isn't recycling any water that has ever been flushed down a toilet..
It is funny isn't it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gorekerrydreamticket Donating Member (422 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
60. Good point
we all live in giant biosphere...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
9. If I was deperate enough...
I suspect I'd drink sea water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Oh I'd definitely rather drink desalinized sea water over
toilet bowl water. loL!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loves_dulcinea Donating Member (384 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. yep, you and me, both
and then we'd die of dehydration, that's what salt water does to people. kills em dead...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Itchinjim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
10. Why not? My dog does,
and if it's good enough for her it's good enough for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. LOL!!
Oh whatever

If dogs licking their private parts is good enough for them, I'm pretty sure it's not good enough for you!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Itchinjim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Licking my own private parts?
Or the dog's private parts? Because I do have standards after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemGa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
14. Yes, the system will work perfectly; there is no reason for concern
LOL!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kajsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
15. Sure, as long as it's purified.
The water needs to run through my PUR filter too,
to take out all the chlorine they dump in it.

Btw; that plant is located approximately two miles from
where I live. It's right off the 405 and Euclid in Fountain Valley.
Driving by the plant is one stinky experience, especially on a
warm day.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
17. Would you care if they don't get the
Edited on Sun Jan-20-08 11:29 AM by 4MoronicYears
estrogens out of the water??

http://xiaodongpeople.blogspot.com/2005/12/estrogen-in-wastewater-affecting-ocean.html
LONG BEACH - A male fish off the Southern California coast is getting in touch with its feminine side.

And that has some scientists worried.

Kevin Kelley, a professor of environmental endocrinology at Cal State Long Beach, is part of a team studying a species of male flatfish in Southern California waters that has been found to have high levels of estrogen, which appear to be causing feminization.

Kelley and other researchers believe that the treated wastewater draining through underground pipes into waters off Santa Monica, Huntington Beach and the Palos Verdes Peninsula contains human estrogen hormones expelled in human urine.


http://watercenter.unl.edu/WaterSciLab/Estrogens2007.asp
Estrogens in Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluent

By Daniel D. Snow,
Manager of Laboratory Services
UNL Water Sciences Laboratory

University of Nebraska, Omaha environmental toxicologist Alan Kolok and University of Nebraska-Lincoln environmental chemist Daniel Snow, along with their graduate students, are in the second year of a two-year study to determine whether estrogenic compounds are released from wastewater treatment plants in Nebraska and whether these compounds occur at sufficient levels to feminize male fish.

Estrogens and other compounds that mimic female sex steroids control development of female reproductive systems including those of fish. For example, male fish exposed to estrogenic compounds can develop feminine traits such as production of egg proteins. Recent studies worldwide have found that estrogenic compounds may occur in wastewater effluent throughout Western Europe and North America at high enough levels to feminize male fish. The environmental implications of these findings are only just beginning to be understood.

In the first year of this Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality-funded study, specially designed passive samplers and caged fish were exposed to water above and below the effluent discharge from wastewater treatment plants in Hastings, Columbus and Grand Island, Nebraska.

The passive samplers, designed to simulate and measure exposure of aquatic organisms to a variety of contaminants, were extracted and analyzed at the UNL Water Sciences Laboratory for a suite of natural and synthetic steroid hormones.

Elevated levels of several natural estrogens were found in the passive sampler below the Hastings plant effluent. Lower, but still detectable, levels of these compounds were also found in samplers exposed to effluent below the Grand Island treatment plant while none were found in the sampler exposed to the Columbus plant effluent, as well as three control sites not impacted by wastewater.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Ah, the real question: How do they get pharmaceuticals out?
People pass whatever prescription drugs they are on in their urine. Antidepressants, ritalin, birth control, whatever. I wonder how they get that out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. I believe the technical explanation is
"We are screwn".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #19
32. Again?
That explanation has been at number one longer than The Dark Side Of The Moon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. How might I ask, is it that the moon always shows its "face" to
the earth? I mean, what were the odds that its rotation would exactly match the time it takes to revolve around the earth?? Just curious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. I believe that gravity is the answer.
The Earth has a strong effect on the moon. However, you gotta seek out someone expeert in such matters, I can only claim to have seen a cople of TV shows on it.

I had another Dark Side Of the Moon in mind. One that was on the Billboard Top 200 album chart for about 28 decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #38
47. 28 decades..... rich that... and yes, it is in my collection, went to
the concert in fact, much smoke there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #37
50. The odds are 100%.
It's called being tidally locked, and it's quite common for satellites and their planets.

There's even a mathematical formula to calculate how long it takes a satellite to become locked.

No magic, elves, voodoo, or other mystical explanations. Just plain old raw science.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tidal_locking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #50
58. Why isn't the earth "locked" in its revolution about the sun? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #58
59. The answer is in the equation.
a in the equation is the semi-major axis, or essentially the maximum distance between the bodies.

93,000,000 miles from the Earth to the sun vs. 400,000 miles from the Earth to the moon. That number is raised to the power of 6 in the numerator of the equation, thus incredibly increasing the amount of time it will take for the Earth to become tidally locked with the sun. I'm going to guess it will take longer for that to happen than the sun will last.

But do read the Wikipedia entry. There are many examples.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #59
61. Thank you for your efforts, I thought it might be because the
moon is travelling in a straght line alongside the earth. That theory makes sense to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #61
63. Your comment confused me.
The moon travels in a straight line alongside the Earth?

No, it revolves around the Earth just as the Earth revolves around the sun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #63
65. Referring to this seemingly odd take on how things might actually
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #65
68. "Odd"? Try "completely wrong."
That person is highly confused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #68
72. Me too. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #18
33. Exactly what I was going to ask.
I think the answer is, they don't!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
judy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
22. This is another place where the US trails behind the rest of the world
Countries in Europe (France notably) have had sewage treatment plants in areas that are subject to drought ever since the 60's.
They work fine...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
23. NEVER. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
24. We eat vegetables grown in shit, what's the difference??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #24
43. Well, the organic eaters do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chicagolefty Donating Member (38 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
25. I don't see a problem with it
We need to get creative on how we make use of our natural resources. The water than falls from the sky could have evaporated from a cess pool somewhere. The only difference is that the purification system was natural vs. man made. I don't see the difference other than doing it ourselves could be quite beneficial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
26. Most people are already drinking toilet water and have been
for decades. Assuming you are connected into a municipal sewer line, where do you think the water/waste goes when you flush? In Chicago it is estimated the turnaround time between the toilet flush and it coming back out your kitchen faucet is three days. The sewage is treated, the water sent out into Lake Michigan, sucked back into a water purification plant and then sent into the city's water lines. Drink up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. There are something like 12 municipal wastewater treatment plants
upriver from the city of Sacramento's intakes... :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
27. Woof-Woof. Bark-Bark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
28. We All Already Do.
Eventually, even the SHITTIESTTTT of water returns to the atmosphere as rain after its own natural filtration process, and returns to our reservoirs.

As long as the purification technology works, then what's the problem? Ya gotta open your mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #28
35. A septic tank skips even that (evaporation) step.
Much (most?) of the effluent from a septic tank percolates through soil bacteria which purifies it (eats the pathogens) and eventually into the water table.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phylny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #35
62. We're building a house on a lake, and we have to pay bigger
bucks to have a pump back septic system, so that there is less chance of the "runoff" running into the lake.

The county also requires us to clean out the septic tank every two years, and would love it if we did it every year.

I don't mind. We swim in the water, and it's clean, so we want to keep it that way.

My husband used to run an old refinery/gas storage terminal on Lake Michigan, and he was required by the EPA to purify any water discharged into the lake to be cleaner than the actual lake water was. They were very strict, and the company was very adamant that the wastewater treatment must be in compliance, and it was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debbierlus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
29. If it ia choice between sewer water & NO water, what do you think?

Many places are in for severe water shortages.

This won't even be given a thought in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
30. The water that comes out of the sewage plant
is probably cleaner than the water that comes out of the faucet now.

You've seen the California aqueduct, right? You think pesticides and animal shit don't get in there?

Think again...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
34. They do that here too.
Edited on Mon Jan-21-08 12:20 AM by Jamastiene
I'm a Dasani person myself. Can't drink the tap water here. It stinks to high heaven with all that shit in it...literally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
36. Maybe. But it would be great for watering lawns, golf courses, etc.
Not a bad idea in fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kineneb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
39. fish poop in our water (before purification)
yup, drinking lake water here...local water district does a good job of delivering decent drinking water
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
40. Why not? All manner of organisms
piss and shit in the water we drink now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
41. Where's the betting pool for "date of first mass illness"?
Edited on Mon Jan-21-08 10:09 PM by WinkyDink
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
42. Water isn't forever polluted just because it was once in a toilet
Natural and man made purification processes are actually quite effective.

The natural ones just don't use harsh chemicals or great amounts of energy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. I don't think all infectious waste will get removed. I. Just. Don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. This isn't rocket science
Edited on Mon Jan-21-08 10:38 PM by Canuckistanian
Water purification is a well-understood process from an engineering standpoint.

There are even systems which can safely work on small scales - such as space vehicles, recycling water from waste VERY safely.

I understand your concern, but I'm currently using tap water that's drawn from a well that's only about 70' from my septic bed. And I'm perfectly confident in that system.

And if my water tests should show that my water is contaminated, there are backup systems such as UV sterilizers or reverse osmosis filters that can solve it.

But it's never happened to me or thousands of my neighbors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #44
51. Some People Don't Believe In Evolution Either.
But facts trump opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #51
67. Neither evolution theory nor ID theory ever caused a water-borne illness.
Edited on Thu Jan-24-08 10:05 PM by WinkyDink
"Those who don't support reclaimed wastewater projects aren't convinced. Daniel A. Okun, a professor of environmental engineering at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, says, "Epidemiological studies are not sufficiently robust to reveal the connections between the contamination and disease, which takes decades to show up. greatest objection is increased health risk." Okun also remarks that the proposed method does not include any processes specifically directed at removing trace organic contaminants, a dangerous omission in the opinion of many opponents."
http://www.ehponline.org/docs/2000/108-10/forum.html

But you go on thinking engineers and other scientists and their works can't fail.
Katrina.
O-rings.
TWA 800.
Etc.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Two Americas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #44
56. it already does
Happens all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
45. Treated? Yes. Many places do.
Get your water from the river, purify it, drink it, pee it, clean it, back into river for next town downstream. Don't forget the ones upstream that are doing the same thing. Treated, is fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
48. No. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
49. hell yeah. alerting. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ishoutandscream2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
52. "Water? You mean, out of the toilet?"
Sorry, another Idiocracy moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Two Americas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
54. all water is "toilet water"
All water at some point is "toilet water." It cycles endlessly. If Los Angeles is going to re-cycle water more quickly and stop draining the fresh water from the state and dumping it into the ocean, that is a very good idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trashcanistanista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
55. No, but my cats love it straight from
the bowl.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
66. So?
Where I live they already do that. It's what sewage treatment plants basically do. I don't see the big deal.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WritersBlock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
70. The water cycle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seasat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
71. I use a minature of that system in my lab
The large particulates are filtered out first, then it goes through a couple of reverse osmosis filters. That is followed by intense UV filtration and deionization (which they are not using). The end result is water so extremely pure that, if you let it stand too long, it pulls CO2 out of the air and becomes acidic. They dissolved the bottom out of a stainless steel pan using a similar system in another lab (over a long time use, of course).

While their water isn't laboratory grade pure, it is probably healthier water than what they pull from the rivers or from an aquifer. It won't have the pollutants leached through the ground or from runoff. If they went to this system in the Florida Keys, it would help in saving the reefs.

I'd love for Florida to go with systems like these in conjunction with conservation measures. It'd lessen our water shortages and help remove a lot of pollution that makes it's way into the environment. A lot of the extracted waste could be processed into fertilizer and/or biofuels.

Yep. I'd drink it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC