|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
davidswanson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 08:41 PM Original message |
Nadler Is Blocking Impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 08:42 PM Response to Original message |
1. Jerry's wrong. The usurped power has to be challenged. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 08:47 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Signed and emailed. I can't believe it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cmkramer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:27 AM Response to Reply #1 |
80. Here's the problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sam Ervin jret (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 02:13 PM Response to Reply #80 |
100. If it were a true fair open complete hearing of the details? YES |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 03:46 PM Response to Reply #80 |
116. Sen. Hagel (R) is no fan of Bush. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alllyingwhores (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:17 PM Response to Reply #80 |
138. Actually...most everyone who advocates impeachment is satisfied with that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cmkramer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 01:27 AM Response to Reply #138 |
145. I'm not talking about the public |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 01:28 AM Response to Reply #145 |
146. I know, defending the Constitution is a lefty thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 06:41 PM Response to Reply #1 |
125. Nadler. He's that no neck windbag from back east, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 08:43 PM Response to Original message |
2. Nadler is my rep, andI am VERY disappointed in his actions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loudsue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 11:16 PM Response to Reply #2 |
28. When is he up for re-election? Can we get rid of him? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lurky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 02:04 AM Response to Reply #28 |
39. Every two years -- he's a congressman. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 04:09 AM Response to Reply #39 |
48. Well lurky, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seabiscuit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 07:36 AM Response to Reply #39 |
54. I think perhaps your "idle speculation" just hit the nail on the head. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenfrequed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 09:22 AM Response to Reply #39 |
63. I have long suspected it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Irishonly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:00 AM Response to Reply #39 |
75. I Had Never Thought About It |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 03:34 PM Response to Reply #39 |
114. Why am I not surprised by this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 06:11 PM Response to Reply #39 |
120. I believe the Clintons are too. All the more reason not to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alllyingwhores (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:29 PM Response to Reply #39 |
139. I can't accept that Clinton and her advisors are that stupid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 01:13 AM Response to Reply #2 |
36. please let him know that even though i am from illinois *i* am very |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
N4457S (415 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 03:07 PM Response to Reply #36 |
108. Look... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alllyingwhores (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:32 PM Response to Reply #108 |
140. What...you want to hold criminal accountable for mass murder? That is nuts! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 12:54 AM Response to Reply #108 |
144. and you're fucking RUDE! you've been here one day and you're |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 09:54 PM Response to Reply #2 |
134. Please let him know - that sense of DEEP disappointment stretches |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 08:45 PM Response to Original message |
3. I guess we haven't had enough yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AnOhioan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 08:47 PM Response to Original message |
5. I have no faith in Speaker Pelosi.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueJac (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 09:38 AM Response to Reply #5 |
66. Nancy is bought and paid for........... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
focusfan (884 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:14 AM Response to Reply #66 |
77. i agree something is going on with her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
N4457S (415 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 03:11 PM Response to Reply #66 |
109. But... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sallyseven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 12:09 PM Response to Reply #5 |
92. No because your from Ohio |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sam Ervin jret (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 02:20 PM Response to Reply #92 |
101. What kind of rip bullshit answer is that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
N4457S (415 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 03:14 PM Response to Reply #92 |
111. That's Right... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AnOhioan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 08:33 PM Response to Reply #92 |
130. Should I go stand in corner as well?...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quantess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 12:48 AM Response to Reply #130 |
143. Don't worry, AnOhian |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RufusTFirefly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 08:55 PM Response to Original message |
6. How ironic! The man who once smelled fascism works to scuttle impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 09:01 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Nadler attended the Conyers "Basement Hearings" on Election Violations after '04... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 01:21 AM Response to Reply #9 |
38. i'm looking--here, you look too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 02:14 AM Response to Reply #6 |
41. Wow-!! Really surprised about Nadler--!!! I've been a fan and this is very disappointing ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 08:55 PM Response to Original message |
7. Very disappointing. And he's selling out partially because of Clinton? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 09:06 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. I said months ago that she doesn't want the I word floating around |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 11:20 PM Response to Reply #12 |
30. This makes me ill. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mopinko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 09:00 PM Response to Original message |
8. i just can't believe how many of these clowns threw the I word around |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 09:02 PM Response to Original message |
10. I remember when Boxer questioned Ohio, Nadler bad mouthed paper ballots... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 09:03 PM Response to Original message |
11. Nadler seems pretty reasonable - maybe Bushco has dirt on him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 12:19 PM Response to Reply #11 |
94. Its NOT Bushco that has the dirt! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 02:23 PM Response to Reply #94 |
102. So do you think Nadler's DLC, or being blackmailed by the DLC? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 06:13 PM Response to Reply #102 |
121. Its not "Blackmail" per se. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tbyg52 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 06:28 PM Response to Reply #121 |
122. Thank you for contributing to my political education. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 03:48 PM Response to Reply #94 |
117. The substance of your post is UNIMPEACHABLE. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donkeyotay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 07:23 PM Response to Reply #94 |
126. Excellent post. Change is great so long as everything stays the same. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pacalo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 09:07 PM Response to Original message |
13. Someone from the DNC called for a donation & I refused |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riqster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 12:03 PM Response to Reply #13 |
89. I do the same thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr.Phool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 09:09 PM Original message |
I'll be a Democrat for one more week. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frog92969 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 09:32 PM Response to Original message |
17. 3 for me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hell Hath No Fury (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:40 AM Response to Original message |
83. This is really important. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jwirr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:57 AM Response to Reply #83 |
86. I think they see some of the consequences when they send out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hell Hath No Fury (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 12:57 PM Response to Reply #86 |
95. Let'em know WHY... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr.Phool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 03:41 PM Response to Reply #83 |
115. Good idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donkeyotay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 07:27 PM Response to Reply #83 |
127. The real consequence is that by abandoning us they get big corporate bucks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 09:09 PM Original message |
K&R. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 09:09 PM Response to Original message |
14. The State Of The Union |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chisox08 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 10:34 AM Response to Reply #14 |
73. The State of the Union is a LIE! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 09:11 PM Response to Original message |
15. Thanks.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KaryninMiami (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 09:13 PM Response to Original message |
16. How utterly depressing and disappointing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 09:36 PM Response to Original message |
18. Nadler. WTF? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lurky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 02:09 AM Response to Reply #18 |
40. Ooh, that's mean! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 10:03 PM Response to Original message |
19. I would imagine that an impeachment hearing is the last thing Mrs. Clinton wants as well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
N4457S (415 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 03:15 PM Response to Reply #19 |
112. Right Again! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 10:15 PM Response to Original message |
20. That this is even a an issue just indicates how far gone our nation is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
intheflow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 10:24 PM Response to Original message |
21. "Parties that seek to impeach are not punished at the next election." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 10:37 PM Response to Original message |
22. It's pretty simple. If impeachment is pursued, we'll have ourselves another LIHOP/MIHOP tragedy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 10:47 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. These bastards will get off without any punishment. Cheney will move to Dubai. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 10:50 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. "Nice country you have here. Be a real shame if somethin' were to happen to it..." -- Dick Cheney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 10:52 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Democrats are weak on terror, bush/cheney terror. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 10:55 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. A GOP Congressman was shown to be funding Al Qaeda. Imagine what a GOP Executive is capable of. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 02:22 AM Response to Reply #22 |
42. Rather, impeachment would strengthen the interest in justice and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
halobeam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:35 AM Response to Reply #42 |
81. exactly, that is why traditionally going for impeachment results in winning elections. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WritersBlock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 04:06 AM Response to Reply #22 |
46. Y'know what, that really is the only thing that makes sense of the Dems' actions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 09:07 AM Response to Reply #46 |
61. That's the conclusion I came to, at least. Occam's Razor, and all that. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 09:24 AM Response to Reply #22 |
64. and so give in to the terrorists' every demand? I don't think so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenfrequed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 10:02 AM Response to Reply #22 |
70. Uhm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 10:24 AM Response to Reply #70 |
72. They're afraid that the current occupants of the White House will create another tragedy. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenfrequed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 06:31 PM Response to Reply #72 |
123. And so... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 06:38 PM Response to Reply #123 |
124. Yes it does. It's called 'extortion' (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sam Ervin jret (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 02:31 PM Response to Reply #22 |
103. Hope, you want to wait and hope? Now that's a campaign strategy only a democrat could love |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 02:49 PM Response to Reply #103 |
106. "that's a campaign strategy only a democrat could love" is a phrase only a Freeper could love. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orwellian_Ghost (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 10:50 PM Response to Original message |
24. Thanks David |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 11:18 PM Response to Original message |
29. Impeach NOW! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacetalksforall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 12:25 AM Response to Original message |
31. Wexler said he had been against impeachment - wanted to get more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 04:31 AM Response to Reply #31 |
49. Don't have answers, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 08:44 AM Response to Reply #49 |
59. yes the CJ "presides" but his role is essentially ministerial |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 12:28 AM Response to Original message |
32. Swanson really needs to get a fact-checker. Among his misstatements: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidswanson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 01:00 AM Response to Reply #32 |
34. sadly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 01:04 AM Response to Reply #34 |
35. I don't believe i've ever heard anyone claim that the impechment effort decimated the repubs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidswanson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 02:29 AM Response to Reply #35 |
44. you must |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 07:49 AM Response to Reply #44 |
56. I spend a great deal of time in COngress and there was no serious impeachment effort v truman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidswanson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 12:06 PM Response to Reply #56 |
90. bender's impeachment resolution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 03:13 PM Response to Reply #90 |
110. I don't believe the Chicago Tribune endorsed bender's resolution and here are Dirksen's comments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bbgrunt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 12:50 AM Response to Original message |
33. k and r. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Justice Is Comin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 01:15 AM Response to Original message |
37. "Non impeachment hearings?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 02:25 AM Response to Reply #37 |
43. "Non-impeachment hearings" sounds like it came out of a word factory --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Voltaire99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 02:37 AM Response to Original message |
45. Democoward. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 04:06 AM Response to Original message |
47. anybody else read this headline as "Nader" instead of Nadler? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radfringe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 05:44 AM Response to Original message |
50. confused |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Disturbed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 06:29 AM Response to Reply #50 |
51. The majority of Dems are afraid of something. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tanyev (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 08:37 AM Response to Reply #51 |
58. I don't know either, but I bet it's locked up in Cheney's man-sized safe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 09:57 AM Response to Reply #51 |
68. maybe their phones are being tapped too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eowyn_of_rohan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 09:59 AM Response to Reply #51 |
69. They started turning weird right around the time of anthrax -nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jaybeat (729 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 01:14 PM Response to Reply #51 |
98. They are afraid, I fear, of we the people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 06:34 AM Response to Original message |
52. David, you've offered a very detailed argument but left out one glaring detail |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidswanson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 12:08 PM Response to Reply #52 |
91. can you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeeDeeNY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 07:24 AM Response to Original message |
53. Nadler is Chairman of the Subcommittee on the Constitution? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jonnyra (205 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 07:39 AM Response to Original message |
55. Doesnt matter what the reason is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrioticintellect (490 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 07:57 AM Response to Original message |
57. To the man introducing impeachment articles |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flasoapbox (80 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 08:46 AM Response to Original message |
60. When I first read the headline, I thought it said "Nader" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
N4457S (415 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 03:17 PM Response to Reply #60 |
113. Speaking of... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cartach (361 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 09:10 AM Response to Original message |
62. Just another reminder |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sam Ervin jret (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 02:45 PM Response to Reply #62 |
105. Some of us can post and produce at the same time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueJac (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 09:37 AM Response to Original message |
65. Big money wins again! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 09:43 AM Response to Original message |
67. signed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidwparker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 10:11 AM Response to Original message |
71. David, when I read your headline, I got a sense of the problem, IMHO. The |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidswanson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:58 AM Response to Reply #71 |
87. nadler backs hillary and speaks at rallies for her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 04:43 PM Response to Reply #87 |
118. David - IMHO, the main reason Pelosi is blocking Impeachment and investigations is because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donkeyotay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 07:36 PM Response to Reply #118 |
128. Well said. That's the elephant that everyone is tippy toeing around. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 10:52 AM Response to Original message |
74. K & R & Impeach two too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sadie5 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:02 AM Response to Reply #74 |
76. david parker |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kelligesq (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:17 AM Response to Original message |
78. Free phone numbers to DC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kelligesq (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 01:01 PM Response to Reply #78 |
97. NEW TOLL FREE THAT WORKS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andrea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
79. K & R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
82. OK, Nadler constituents... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 12:59 PM Response to Reply #82 |
96. He's my Congressman and I still back him. He knows damn well what evil he's up against. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidswanson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 01:57 PM Response to Reply #96 |
99. is he up against it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidswanson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:55 AM Response to Original message |
84. Why Toothless Imperial Presidency Hearings Are Not a New Idea: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femrap (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:55 AM Response to Original message |
85. Big time K AND R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lala_rawraw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:58 AM Response to Original message |
88. well, i have to say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
undeterred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 12:12 PM Response to Original message |
93. Nadler shall heretofore be known as NADLESS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
november3rd (653 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
104. It ain't about elections |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sam Ervin jret (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 02:57 PM Response to Reply #104 |
107. Like I posted on another thread. DON'T LET YOUR CONGRESS PERSON GO TO THE WHITE HOUSE TO VIEW THE .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 05:26 PM Response to Original message |
119. Jerrold 'Quisling' Nadler |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donkeyotay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 07:44 PM Response to Original message |
129. K&R. Post election everyone will just want to move forward. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 09:22 PM Response to Original message |
131. When the Repukes impeached President Clinton for having sex..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nancyharris (637 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 09:32 PM Response to Reply #131 |
132. I see your point , Sarah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 09:50 PM Response to Reply #132 |
133. Sure he was. He was impeached for lying about having had sex |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nancyharris (637 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 10:10 PM Response to Reply #133 |
135. He was impeached |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 10:12 PM Response to Reply #135 |
136. He was impeached. These criminals in the White House need to be impeached. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nancyharris (637 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 10:23 PM Response to Reply #136 |
137. I know it is hard to fathom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:55 PM Response to Reply #137 |
141. I know it's hard for you to fathom that baseball isn't as important as impeaching these criminals... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nancyharris (637 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 12:40 AM Response to Reply #141 |
142. Amazingly, you couldn't be more wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 08:06 PM Response to Reply #142 |
147. Actually, since the Democratic Party began to lean right, it's become ineffectual. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 16th 2024, 01:12 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC