|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 04:51 PM Original message |
Poll question: Negative Rec's.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 04:53 PM Response to Original message |
1. I've been an advocate for that for a long while. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojambo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 04:54 PM Response to Original message |
2. Do we really need to add more negativity to the DU mix these days? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 04:58 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. This is to offset the promotion of negative threads |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojambo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 05:00 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. I can see a case for them, I guess. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bright Eyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 04:54 PM Response to Original message |
3. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 04:54 PM Response to Original message |
4. Try SlashDot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asthmaticeog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 04:56 PM Response to Original message |
5. Sure, because rec wars will be so useful to the forum, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 04:56 PM Response to Original message |
6. No. Talk about an invitation to a flame war. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 05:00 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. of course not, there isn't hardly enough acrimony here! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 04:56 PM Response to Original message |
7. no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 04:59 PM Response to Original message |
9. Won't that be a feature on the new DU 3.0? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StefanX (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 05:07 PM Response to Original message |
12. Wow -- I just started a similar thread on a similar topic (which got locked...) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 05:08 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. I noticed that. Weird huh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 05:07 PM Response to Original message |
13. No, there's enough "rec my thread!" email loops already. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kokonoe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 05:12 PM Response to Original message |
15. As long as I can see all the + or - recommends |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 05:15 PM Response to Original message |
16. No. Enough negativity as it is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemGa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
17. We'd all be wounded Negative Rec'ers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeepModem Mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
18. No. Ditto, SlashDot. This is, or has been, a community. I think, in fact, I would no longer... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lurky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 05:22 PM Response to Original message |
19. Would there be an Anti-Greatest Page? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 05:26 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. That would be great! lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lurky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 05:34 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. I hate to admit, I would probably read it every day. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoGOPZone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 05:27 PM Response to Original message |
21. I wish I had that feature right now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 06:10 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. HA! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 05:38 PM Response to Original message |
23. the only problem is that allows any cohesive group to silence everyone else |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 06:10 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. What if it took 5 negative recs to cancel 1 positive one? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 06:33 PM Response to Reply #25 |
29. wouldn't change that it would allow a small group to silence individuals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 06:12 PM Response to Original message |
26. Definitely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karlrschneider (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 06:15 PM Response to Original message |
27. I'd rather have a SAF |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 06:21 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. I thought LONG and HARD about whether to include that APOSTROPHE! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IsItJustMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
30. Real easy to go down that road, but I do feel it's slippery slope and I think the end result is that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 06:53 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. Possibly true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Straight Story (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 06:36 PM Response to Original message |
31. I voted NO for this reason: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 06:38 PM Response to Original message |
32. A negative recommendation has to have negative consequences for the voter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 07:08 PM Response to Original message |
34. No. It would encourage negative, divisive behavior. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Tires (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 08:34 PM Response to Original message |
35. i'd rather see a 'reputation system' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 16th 2024, 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC