Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Issues Signing Statement on Defense Act, Waiving Ban on Permanent Iraq Bases

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 05:33 PM
Original message
Bush Issues Signing Statement on Defense Act, Waiving Ban on Permanent Iraq Bases
from AlterNet's PEEK:



Bush Issues Signing Statement on Defense Act, Waiving Ban on Permanent Iraq Bases

Posted by Amanda Terkel, Think Progress at 2:07 PM on January 29, 2008.

Throughout his presidency, Bush has issued more than 151 signing statements challenging 1149 provisions of laws.



President Bush yesterday signed the 2008 National Defense Authorization Act after initially rejecting Congress's first version because it would have allegedly opened the Iraqi government to "expensive lawsuits."

Even though he forced Congress to change its original bill, Bush's signature yesterday came with a little-noticed signing statement, claiming that provisions in the law "could inhibit the President's ability to carry out his constitutional obligations." CQ reports on the provisions Bush plans to disregard:

One such provision sets up a commission to probe contracting fraud in Iraq and Afghanistan. Another expands protections for whistleblowers who work for government contractors. A third requires that U.S. intelligence agencies promptly respond to congressional requests for documents. And a fourth bars funding for permanent bases in Iraq and for any action that exercises U.S. control over Iraq's oil money.


In his "Memorandum of Justification" for the waiver, Bush cited his Nov. 26 "Declaration of Principles for a Long-Term Relationship of Cooperation and Friendship" between Iraq and the United States. This agreement has been aggressively opposed by both Republicans and Democrats in Congress as not only unprecedented, but also potentially unconstitutional because it was enacted without the agreement of the legislation branch.

Today on CNN, Rep. Bill Delahunt (D-MA) voiced concern that this declaration may indefinitely commit U.S. troops to fighting Iraq's civil wars:

Involved in those declaration of principles, there is an implicit potential for the United States military forces, years from now, being involved in a full-blown civil war in Iraq. And I don't believe that's where the American people want us and I don't think that's in the best interest of our national security.


Earlier this month, Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT) introduced legislation requiring the Bush administration "to consult with Congress before moving forward with any agreement that could lead to long term security arrangements and other major economic and political commitments."

Throughout his presidency, Bush has issued more than 151 signing statements challenging 1149 provisions of laws.

http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/75365/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Please dear Power/Powers That Be. Bundle this bastard up with his
Unca Dick and the rest of them and send them to he Hague. On January 21st. Please, please, please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Will the next President be ready to sign an EO to put Bush under permanent house arrest?
In Crawford Texas. I doubt he would want to live there permanently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. i wonder what will be left of this country when he leaves
i feel sorry for the person who has to clean up this mess...



isn`t it time to bring charges against him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. "i feel sorry for the person who has to clean up this mess..."
That's what I'm wondering....Who wants to be captain of the half-submerged Titanic? :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC