Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CREW Cuts: White House Destroys Back-up Email, Ralph Reed on CNN, Mukasey and more...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 06:16 PM
Original message
CREW Cuts: White House Destroys Back-up Email, Ralph Reed on CNN, Mukasey and more...

White House Admits Destroying Back-up Copies of Emails



White HouseOn January 15th, in a court filing submitted in response to CREW's lawsuit, the White House admitted destroying back-up copies of some of its emails. Over 10 million emails are missing from between March 2003 and October 2005 and the White House stated that up until October of 2003, back-up tapes containing the only copies of some of the missing emails were recycled.

This means that there likely are no back-up copies of emails deleted during the period of March 2003 through October 2003. During this time, top White House officials leaked the covert identity of Valerie Plame Wilson and the Justice Department began a criminal investigation into the leak.

The White House has offered no explanation as to why the emails were deleted, how many were actually lost and why it never acted to recover any of the missing emails, even when presented with a recovery plan by its own Office of Administration.

After filing this court document, the White House deputy press secretary denied that there were, in fact, any missing emails. As a result, House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Henry A. Waxman (D-CA), released a letter stating that the White House had informed committee staff that there were 473 days for which no emails were stored for one or more of the White House offices. CREW prepared an analysis of the national news on the dates for which the emails are missing, available on http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=JKVLP7%2BJDfBTfZXlQstuttJLld%2FEvIA0">CREW's website.

http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=KoKeY%2FBdEqmtHDFUR%2BnHR9JLld%2FEvIA0">Read more

http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=ykhMRFkBNWHtkkEnhwesF9JLld%2FEvIA0">Read The Washington Post story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. I am sure the explanation can be found in the fuck you 4 ever file
stored in the Endless Shredder department.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. damn...
I wonder how that compares to the 18 minutes missing from the Nixon tapes. And, who is this informant?

The White House is required by law to preserve e-mails considered presidential or federal records, and it is the target of several lawsuits seeking information about missing data and efforts to preserve electronic communications.
The internal study found that for Bush's executive office, no e-mails were archived on 12 separate days between December 2003 and February 2004, Waxman said. Vice President Cheney's office showed no electronic messages on 16 occasions from September 2003 to May 2005.

Archived e-mails were missing from even more days in other parts of the White House, the analysis found. The Council on Environmental Quality and the Council of Economic Advisers, for example, showed no stored e-mails for 2 1/2 months beginning in November 2003. The Office of Management and Budget showed no messages for 59 days -- including the period from Nov. 1, 2003, to Dec. 9, 2003 -- and the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative showed no e-mail for 73 days.
--------------------------

CREW also asserted in court papers filed yesterday that "critical and highly relevant evidence may have been destroyed" by the White House.

The group's chief counsel, Anne Weismann, said the chart referenced in Waxman's letter corresponded to information from an informant who contacted the group and described nearly 500 days between 2003 and 2005 when no e-mails from several White House offices were archived.

Weismann said the source further described many more days during the same period when the volume of archived e-mail was unusually low. "The example I was given is that the average volumes per day in the White House office, for example, was 60,000 to 100,000, yet there were entire weeks when it was as low as five a day," she said.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/17/AR2008011703575_pf.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. beyond curious
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. it's comparable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. This is like 18 MONTHS of Nixon's tapes coming up missing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
4. Henry Waxman has been very busy, nice to know.
actions speak louder than words though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. IIRC, of particular interest are the missing emails on the dates immediately after Saddam's
"capture".

:kick: for CREW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Ah....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC