Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrats Okay Funds for Covert Ops

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:17 PM
Original message
Democrats Okay Funds for Covert Ops
http://www.counterpunch.org/andrew05022008.html

Secret Bush "Finding" Widens War on Iran
By ANDREW COCKBURN

Six weeks ago, President Bush signed a secret finding authorizing a covert offensive against the Iranian regime that, according to those familiar with its contents, "unprecedented in its scope."

Bush’s secret directive covers actions across a huge geographic area – from Lebanon to Afghanistan – but is also far more sweeping in the type of actions permitted under its guidelines – up to and including the assassination of targeted officials. This widened scope clears the way, for example, for full support for the military arm of Mujahedin-e Khalq, the cultish Iranian opposition group, despite its enduring position on the State Department's list of terrorist groups.

Similarly, covert funds can now flow without restriction to Jundullah, or "army of god," the militant Sunni group in Iranian Baluchistan – just across the Afghan border -- whose leader was featured not long ago on Dan Rather Reports cutting his brother in law's throat.

Other elements that will benefit from U.S. largesse and advice include Iranian Kurdish nationalists, as well the Ahwazi arabs of south west Iran. Further afield, operations against Iran's Hezbollah allies in Lebanon will be stepped up, along with efforts to destabilize the Syrian regime.

All this costs money, which in turn must be authorized by Congress, or at least a by few witting members of the intelligence committees. That has not proved a problem. An initial outlay of $300 million to finance implementation of the finding has been swiftly approved with bipartisan support, apparently regardless of the unpopularity of the current war and the perilous condition of the U.S. economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sick news. Very important. Big Rec. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. WE MUST SHOW THIS TO THE WORLD
LET'S TAKE A LESSON FROM THESE GUYS, MY NEXT POST!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zWu-BSIUs2E
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Wow! Thanks for that SLAD!
Expose. Teach. Speak. Truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. SHOVE IT IN THEIR FACES!
Edited on Fri May-02-08 02:55 PM by seemslikeadream
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Once again we have proof positive
that Washington just doesn't hear or care what "we the people", are saying. Its a secret, WHY, let me guess, so nobody can object before its a done deal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. from the 1980's "you didnt really think that a hammer costs $400, did you"
this type of thing always gets funding, at least most of the time they have the decency to do it under the table
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. The "good German" defense will come in handy for those who voted for it.
"I didn't know what the money was actually going for."

See IWR vote for a precedent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andre II Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. Proudly the fith rec!
Go, SLAD!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andre II Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. Proudly the fifth rec!
Go, SLAD!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. Hmmm, are we sure it's smart to send our tax Dollars to these guys...?
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/para/mek.htm

Mujahedeen-e-Khalq (MEK) is the largest and most militant group opposed to the Islamic Republic of Iran. Also known as the People’s Mujahedeen Organization of Iran, MEK is led by husband and wife Massoud and Maryam Rajavi. MEK was added to the U.S. State Department’s list of foreign terrorist groups in 1997.

-snip

Activities

The group has targeted Iranian government officials and government facilities in Iran and abroad; during the 1970s, it attacked Americans in Iran. While the group says it does not intentionally target civilians, it has often risked civilian casualties. It routinely aims its attacks at government buildings in crowded cities. MEK terrorism has declined since late 2001. Incidents linked to the group include:

The series of mortar attacks and hit-and-run raids during 2000 and 2001 against Iranian government buildings; one of these killed Iran’s chief of staff

The 2000 mortar attack on President Mohammad Khatami’s palace in Tehran

The February 2000 “Operation Great Bahman,” during which MEK launched 12 attacks against Iran

The 1999 assassination of the deputy chief of Iran’s armed forces general staff, Ali Sayyad Shirazi

The 1998 assassination of the director of Iran’s prison system, Asadollah Lajevardi

The 1992 near-simultaneous attacks on Iranian embassies and institutions in 13 countries Assistance to Saddam Hussein’s suppression of the 1991 Iraqi Shiite and Kurdish uprisings

The 1981 bombing of the offices of the Islamic Republic Party and of Premier Mohammad-Javad Bahonar, which killed some 70 high-ranking Iranian officials, including President Mohammad-Ali Rajaei and Bahonar Support for the 1979 takeover of the U.S. Embassy in Tehran by Iranian revolutionaries

The 1970s killings of U.S. military personnel and civilians working on defense projects in Tehran

In the early 1970s, angered by U.S. support for the pro-Western shah, MEK members killed several U.S. soldiers and civilians working on defense projects in Iran. Some experts say the attack may have been the work of a Maoist splinter faction operating beyond the Rajavi leadership’s control. MEK members also supported the 1979 takeover of the U.S. Embassy in Tehran, in which 52 Americans were held hostage for 444 days.

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/para/mek.htm


Who sponsors terrorism agian? I'm so confused.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Preston120 Donating Member (177 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. Who approved the funds again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. House and Senate Intel Committees
have to sign off on such expenditures.

In fact, smart money says it's staff or associates of staff from those committees who leaked this news to Cockburn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Preston120 Donating Member (177 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Shame on them, the same folks who wanted TeleCom Immuity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Still want immunity. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
12. Or these guys?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jundallah

Jundullah (Army of Allah)... is a militant organization that is based in Balochistan. It is a part of the Baloch insurgency in Pakistan and in Iran's Sistan and Baluchistan Province. Jundallah claims that it has 1,000 fighters and has killed Iranian soldiers. The group has been identified as a terrorist organization by Iran and Pakistan. Some believe the group is linked to Al-Qaeda.

-snip

The group's leader is known to be Abdolmalek Rigi (also known as Emir Abdul Malek Baloch)...

In an interview with Dan Rather, Rigi describes the Iranian military as "cowardly" and in that video, he cuts off a person's head in front of the camera, in Al-Qaeda style.



http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Jundullah

Regi "used to fight with the Taliban" and is "part drug smuggler, part Taliban, part Sunni activist," according to Alexis Debat, a "senior fellow on counterterrorism at the Nixon Center and an ABC News consultant who recently met with Pakistani officials and tribal members," Ross and Isham wrote.

"Pakistani government sources say the secret campaign against Iran by Jundullah was on the agenda when Vice President Dick Cheney met with Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf in February," Ross and Isham wrote. "A senior U.S. government official said groups such as Jundullah have been helpful in tracking al Qaeda figures and that it was appropriate for the U.S. to deal with such groups in that context."

"Some former CIA officers say the arrangement is reminiscent of how the U.S. government used proxy armies, funded by other countries including Saudi Arabia, to destabilize the government of Nicaragua in the 1980s,"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warren pease Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
14. That's why this thread makes more sense with every passing minute...
As Hubs2Sparkly put in his typically low-key, understated way:

I would LOVE to see every fucking one of them out on their asses come November.

Maybe that's not soon enough, though. The Calif. primary is, what?, June 3rd this year? If so, that leaves a month to make sure Shirley Golub has the money, organization and voter commitment she needs to eliminate the most despicable pain in the ass in the entire House -- that icon of flaccid leadership and uncompromising support for the worst administration in US history herself: Ms. Pelosi, our lady of the perpetual botox injection and architect of the brilliant "off the table" strategy of good government.

Oh, please, San Franciscans, people of my own home town, please do everything possible to rid the country of this incompetent fool.

Thanks in advance,


wp

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
15. American blood money.
:mad:

K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BreweryYardRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
16. Ugh. I was hoping the Pugs had wised up and started using Special Forces more.
Edited on Fri May-02-08 04:32 PM by seawolf
In an ideal world, we'd be giving foreign aid to third-world countries and not exploiting them, in order to promote secular education and a higher standard of living. Which would pre-emptively reduce the recruiting pool for terrorist groups. People not blinded by fundie religion and with something to live for don't strap on suicide bombs. And finally, using Special Forces in conjunction with local police to handle the (relatively) smaller groups that would pop up.

But nope, it's the Repugs supporting terrorism again. A lot of the guys in this administration did it in the 80s in Afghanistan, and look what that got us. Obviously they just don't give a shit, so long as they can skim money off the top and rake in more profits for their buddies in Big Business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 03:48 AM
Response to Original message
19. Profiles in Cowardice . . . someone should write the book . . . n/t
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
20. kick. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC