|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
OmahaBlueDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 11:09 AM Original message |
Poll question: In your opinion, will abortion be legal in all circumstances, in all 50 states 5 years from today? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynatnite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 11:10 AM Response to Original message |
1. TN is always trying to outlaw abortion... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RufusTFirefly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 11:13 AM Response to Original message |
2. "Abortion-on-demand"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tbyg52 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 11:15 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. I thought that was interesting phraseology as well. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noamnety (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 11:24 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Same here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmahaBlueDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 11:18 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. If you have a more neutral phrasing, I'll edit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RufusTFirefly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 11:51 AM Response to Reply #5 |
12. Actually, I would've just suggested "abortion." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 01:00 PM Response to Reply #12 |
20. Guess he coulda said "drive-through abortion". Heh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmahaBlueDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 01:14 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. I think if I were as biased as was implied, I'd have said something like.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 01:21 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Yup. And not saying it so strongly is how people stealth their way into reasonable-soundingness. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RufusTFirefly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 01:41 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. Right. A bit like "sexual preference." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tbyg52 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 11:14 AM Response to Original message |
3. It's all about control, and the people who want it aren't going to give up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selatius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 11:21 AM Response to Original message |
6. It's technically legal now per Roe v. Wade. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tbyg52 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 11:35 AM Response to Reply #6 |
10. And it's not just the government, per se |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OregonBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 11:25 AM Response to Original message |
8. So by calling it "abortion on demand" aren't you taking a position? Sorry but your bias is showing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmahaBlueDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 11:29 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. I edited, but I'm curious how that phrasing is biased? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tbyg52 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 11:36 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Because of the way people who are against choice use it. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cerridwen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 12:04 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. It's the forced-birthers' talking point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmahaBlueDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 12:55 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. I hear a lot of that here in the Heartland, but I've never heard A-O-D as a talking point.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cerridwen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 01:00 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. Maybe it's more regional then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OregonBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 04:56 PM Response to Reply #9 |
29. That makes it sound like women can just walk in and DEMAND an abortion without |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hekate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 11:54 AM Response to Original message |
13. It never has been. Roe vs Wade set the law in accordance with what was actually prevailing sentiment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosemary2205 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
15. snort |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmahaBlueDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 12:56 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. Those Loungers are vicious! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyTiedye (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
16. It All Hangs on the Next Presidential Election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmahaBlueDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 12:49 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. I believe South Dakota is going to put a ban on the ballot again.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 01:26 PM Response to Original message |
24. Will many poor people live through the next five years? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 01:33 PM Response to Original message |
25. I'm ignoring the already posted replies, looking at the question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clear Blue Sky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 01:40 PM Response to Original message |
26. Even if Roe is overturned, the issue will then go to the states. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brigid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 01:48 PM Response to Original message |
28. No way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 05:11 PM Response to Original message |
30. The opposite will likely be true - abortion under NO circumstances will be legal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 14th 2024, 10:50 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC