Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Frustrated owners try to unload their guzzlers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:00 AM
Original message
Frustrated owners try to unload their guzzlers
After paying $75 to fill his black Dodge Ram pickup truck for the third time in a week, Douglas Chrystall couldn't take it anymore.

Feeling pinched at the pump, and guilty as well, Chrystall, a 39-year-old father from Wellesley, is putting ads online to sell the truck, and the family's other gas-guzzler, a Jeep Grand Cherokee. He knows it will be tough to unload them because he is one of a growing number of consumers downsizing to smaller, more fuel-efficient cars.

Americans are turning away from the boxy, four-wheel-drive vehicles that have for years dominated the nation's highways. Sport utility vehicles and pickup trucks - symbols of Americans' obsession with horsepower, size, and status - are falling out of favor as consumers rich and poor encounter sticker shock at the pump, paying upward of $80 to fill gas tanks.

The sale of new SUVs and pickup trucks has dropped precipitously in recent months amid soaring gas prices and a weakening economy: SUV sales for the month of April alone fell 32.3 percent from a year earlier and small car sales rose 18.6 percent. This fundamental shift comes against a backdrop of relentless gas increases, and growing concerns over the environment and US oil consumption, according to auto analysts and car dealers.

"The SUV craze was a bubble and now it is bursting," said George Hoffer, an economics professor at Virginia Commonwealth University whose research focuses on the automotive industry. "It's an irrational vehicle. It'll never come back."

http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2008/05/06/frustrated_owners_try_to_unload_their_guzzlers/

I'm sure all you gas tax holiday proponents think its such an awful thing that this guy wants to move from an SUV to a more efficient vehicle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Consumers rich and poor"? That's a joke. More like "consumers poor and poorer."
If you're rich, trust me, you're not hurting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. just breaks my heart
:sarcasm: :sarcasm:

They shouldnt have bought those F-IN Stupid Utility Vehicles in the first place........
:grr: :grr:

:hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Epiphany4z Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. didn't Bush
offer tax breaks for people who bought the big guzzlers at the beginning of his administration?

wasn't worth it hu....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
51. He increased the existing (unwarranted) tax break so much that it
became virtually free to buy a GM Hummer if you owned a business. Total cost depreciated over 5 years. It was just another pay-day for GM, corporate welfare.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. Related...
Edited on Tue May-06-08 11:05 AM by SidDithers
http://www.thestar.com/News/GTA/article/419374

GM cuts 900 in Oshawa

Apr 29, 2008 04:30 AM
Tony Van Alphen
Business Reporter

General Motors is cutting a second shift and more than 900 jobs at its once-mighty Oshawa truck assembly plant this fall in another body blow to Ontario's manufacturing sector.

GM of Canada Ltd., the country's biggest auto maker, told workers yesterday that it will slash between 900 and 1,000 jobs at the plant in early September because of falling demand for its full-size pickup trucks as economic conditions deteriorate and consumers react to soaring fuel prices.

(emphasis added)

Sid

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Ironic that it affects Canada more than US in this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
44. Bad situation.
Answer?

Re-tool and start pumping out hybrids.

Hybrids - not just for the latte-sipping elites, anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. What a stupid conclusion.
This is the most moronic statement I have seen here today: I'm sure all you gas tax holiday proponents think its such an awful thing that this guy wants to move from an SUV to a more efficient vehicle.

Like people would be THRILLED about folks continuing to drive gas guzzlers? That everyone doesn't WANT to be free of foreign oil dependence? That conservation is not GOOD?

How dumb is that assertion? Is it dumb, dumber, or dumbest? I vote for the latter.

Where does this absence of logic come from? It's baffling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Lower prices mean higher consumption.
Hillary wants to break OPEC and give a gas tax holiday which she says will lower gas prices and therefore increase consumption.

Kind of a no brainer to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #7
19. No, they don't. HAVE to mean that.
The money saved at the pump could make the difference between WATER on that supermarket brand cereal, or MILK for a poor family.

Kind of a no brainer to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #19
28. That is increased consumption
You could just eat the cereal by itself too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #28
32. Yeah, to hell with those growing bones and teeth of young children! NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #32
41. Most of us wouldn't be here without cheap, concentrated, non-human energy
Most of us, whether we massively consume the planet or not, are burdens on the ecological system that we inhabit. I know I'm no different. I don't own a car, but I'm pretty sure my clothes are made by a 7 year old girl, whom I will never meet and have a bowl of cereal and milk with, in SE Asia.

Then don't have the cereal, and just have the milk. Or skip a snack so you can get the cereal and milk. We live in physical reality. We can't escape it. To get something we have to give something. All 6.5 billion people, plus the next few billion that come along before that number begins to level off, aren't going to get everything.

Cheap energy allowed us to not have to worry about limits. Well, it turns out that we do have to worry about them. The situation is even worse because of what cheap energy gave us the ability to do. If we manage to somehow come up with more cheap energy, we'll just consume more and increase the impact we have on the habitat in which we exist. We can't escape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #41
55. That makes it "OK" to malnourish the kids here? Because you wear clothes made by a seven year old?
Make your own clothes, why don't you...and give the poor kid in America the milk, too.

There are parents trying to fill their tanks who don't "skip the snack"--they go hungry so their kids can eat. They are the ones putting the Salvation Army two dollar snowsuits on their kids at night because the apartment has NO HEAT.

What an "abandon hope" post. Cheap energy is the root of all evil, so ....



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #55
61. Hope keeps us addicted
I agree, abandon it, just not in pill form.

I didn't say it was ok to malnourish a kid here because I wear clothes made by a 7 year old. I was making a point that I'm just as much a part of the problem as anyone, even though I'm up on the high horse saying go without milk, cereal, or a snack.

Unfortunately, there is no easy answer. If it did come in pill form, then maybe we might have something. We've made the world a very complex place, and we have no destination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #7
22. "Break OPEC" What does that mean?
OPEC sets production levels, not price, although they can influence price.

I don't see how this is going to improve. China has millions of new drivers on their roads. Bush's warmongering has created more uncertainty in the market. We're screwn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #22
40. It screams "Hillary has no clue" to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Holiday gas tax proponents? Do we have those here?
Snort :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. My company uses a lot of fuel for deliveries
Edited on Tue May-06-08 11:41 AM by Winterblues
First quarter of '08 we spent twice as much on fuel as we did the entire year of 2000. Some relief would be welcome to us. We deliver food products so you can imagine what that has done to the cost of food these last few years...We use about a thousand gallons a week and eighteen cents a gallon off would help quite a bit....Could you use $180.00 a week?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. Peak oil means its only going to go up.
I realize that its hurting, but you need to make contingency plans.

How do they handle this in Europe? Gas is WAY more expensive there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. You do have to eat don't you?
Food costs are just going to go up so you better make contingency plans. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #21
26. I'm fine...I just worry about everyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #21
33. As another DUer suggested on another thread,
"round up all the commodity traders and let the rioters have at them." That would provide some relief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #21
36. Talk to the commodity traders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #20
45. maybe they get higher wages than we do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harry Monroe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #20
62. I've been in Europe a few times, last time in 2003
In Italy where gas was about $5/gallon even back then. I don't think I saw a single SUV the whole time I was there, they all drive small, fuel efficient cars. Of course they do not have suburbs and their mass transit systems are very good and government subsidized. They handle it quite well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Epiphany4z Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #14
23. That is IF
the break even got to Bush's desk where he would say nope. summer is nearly hear..this should be on the way to his desk any day.

We also have to believe the that gas prices won't go up to fill that .18 gap ..and oh I doubt it would go back down when the holiday is over.

I mean even it worked it would encourage higher gas prices just because people would probably use more gas.

I just think its not ever going to happen and if it did ..its not a good idea.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. There are two versions, though, see. Clinton's sticks it to the oil companies, McCain's does not.
If Congress can get Clinton's plan passed, Bush HAS to sign it--because otherwise, McCain can be painted as a FLIP FLOPPER in the general election. The public doesn't care about those details, they want the RELIEF.

He was FOR the gas holiday before he was against it...he couldn't even get BUSH to sign the thing to help Americans!!

It's a rather clever downstream strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #27
35. You believe the oil company's lobbyists are going to allow that to be passed? Not a chance in hell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #35
56. If you don't BRING IT UP, the public doesn't get the drift. And the oil companies WIN. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #56
67. As long as republicans are in office the oil companies will win. And they often do well
under dems as well. Their lobbyists are very well paid and every president wants to keep gas prices low.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Epiphany4z Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #27
37. One version
Edited on Tue May-06-08 12:01 PM by Epiphany4z
is a bit better than the next..and she can stick it to the oil companies all she wants if we use more gas it will go up.

Also in the past Obama voted for program like this in his state only to find out it didn't work so well.

and the money Hillary counting on by "sticking it the big oil"she has promised to use for helping to pay for Health care or some other program she is pushing...how much sticking it to big oil are we really counting on?...is it realistic?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #37
57. The idea behind this brief respite is to make it easier to start shaving
obscene profits off the top of these gouging companies.

See, once you do it ONCE, it gets easier to do it again.

It's realistic. And if gas goes up, she'll take more off the top. The oil companies will figure it out. There comes a point where people won't pay--and we are approaching that already--and if they try to charge more, they'll be held up more. This is a RESPITE solution--it is not touted as ANYTHING other than that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #27
47. I have a question
How does Sen. Clinton's plan "stick it to the oil companies"? I do not know the particulars of the two plans, don't feel one way or the other about it because I don't think the idea is actually going anywhere this year. Seems to me a gas tax holiday would just take that much money out of the roads/bridges funding (and the jobs that go with that) and not matter much to the oil companies.

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #47
58. She wants to tax their windfall profit.
And once she does that ONCE, it is easier to do it again--for ANYTHING. Or ANYONE who profits off shortage or need.

America is damned good to corporations. Some of them need to be a little better to America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #58
65. Thank you.
I appreciate your response. I agree with you on the corporations, they need to "give back" as it were.

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #14
24. Oh, but here's the deal.....to hell with you, eh?
What's really going to happen is that everyone is going to gas up their LEXUS SUVs :sarcasm: and go screaming down the road, yelling "HA HA, you ENVIRONMENTALISTS!! I shit on your clean air!!! I CRAP on your conservation!"

It's NEVER going to benefit small businesses, "so they say," or poor people who can't afford the big bite out of their paychecks, and who also can't afford to saunter over to the car dealership and buy a pricy hybrid or subcompact. That's what the people who are criticizing Clinton have to say, because they refuse to SEE how others live. They refuse to acknowledge how hard it is getting for people who live on the edge or who run a small business close to the margins.

These people who don't suffer from 'want' have absolutely no compassion for those who live every day with it. It's astounding. It contravenes everything the Democratic Party stands for, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #14
30. A holiday gas tax is not going to do much. The commodity hoarders are going to see to that.
Some relief? Take a rolaid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bikebloke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
9. SUV's
The new front yard planters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobRossi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
10. Good.
They helped to create the problem, let them reap their reward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
11. they are popping up more and more on sale around here. I want to pick up a cheap Jeep
for camping and boat towing. I love my Corolla but it doesnt tow shit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NuttyFluffers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
68. i'd rather rent it than own it for camping and the like
that way it's insured and i don't have to maintain it for all the times i am not camping or boat towing. i mean, just avoiding the vehicle registration and smog checks alone makes it cheaper to rent a behemoth for awhile than owning one outright, to speak of nothing about the car insurance and daily maintenance, gas, car space, etc.

sometimes borrowing is better than owning. but maybe you camp A LOT, so i have no idea. if you camped or towed your boat more than 2-3 weekends a month every month then maybe it might be worthwhile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaksavage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
12. 2007 Escalade $56,000 only 5000 miles
Anybody want to buy it?

Huh, anyone....

Maybe we will turn them into workforce housing.
Clump them together for multiple rooms.

Or sell them to Iran where gas is 20 cents a gallon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #12
31. Halliburton might buy it use in Iraq. They bill the Gubmint for everything. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomreedtoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
13. Why not turn them into homes?
Pull off the tires (and wrap them in paper and keep them in a garage; this will preserve them). Coat the metal parts with grease and/or anti-rust spray. Prop it up on concrete blocks. Run 120 volt AC into the thing, for heating and fans. (Air conditioning might also be possible.)

SUV's have heavily padded seats that can function as beds. They're insulated from sound and outside temperatures (and a simple roof over the top of them can deflect the heat of the sun).

You could live in one of these things. And it would put them to good use, instead of letting them rust.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City of Mills Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
60. That's why I'm keeping mine :)
Fueling up an SUV is still cheaper than fueling a home in the winter, and I'm planning for the worst.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
15. One word - Carhenge!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #15
38. That is waaaayyy too cool!!!!! May I have a copy? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #15
49. exactly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
16. $75 fillup three times in one week? Wow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
17. I say turn them into shelters for the homeless.
Lord knows they're big enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #17
50. why not, people are now getting thrown in the streets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
18. It used to be that living 40, 50 miles from the job was not that big of a deal
but today I can't see how anyone who lives so far from their job can get by without a gas allowance. My last line of work required me to do a lot of driving each day anywhere from 20, 30 miles to a hundred or more. Theres no way I could do that today. Full sized pick'mup truck required for hauling the tools and such.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Epiphany4z Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #18
25. We just
bought a house 10 min from my husbands work last summer. We had no idea these gas prices w here coming when bought it but ..turns out we did it just in time ..he used to drive an hour each way to get to work..it would have killed us I would have lost my home...there is no way we could have afforded it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #18
34. There are people who live in Southern MAINE and New Hampshire who WORK in Boston.
The strain is already showing on many of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #34
46. There's commuter buses showing up and expanding hours here
I live in MA just off 95 before the border, and the buses coming from Portsmouth are packed. It's also the last/first stop on the T, and the parking lot is often full.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #18
39. I used to drive 60 miles each way for my job as a home health nurse.
That was 12 years ago. The company was pretty big, but in a small town. They didn't have enough nurses living there. I had an allowance then to cover my time on the road, and it helped alot. We also got mileage for our visits. I don't see how they can afford to do this anymore. Alot of people will go without home healthcare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XOKCowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #18
53. I grew up driving pickups. I miss 'em.
I'd love to have a new pickup. They're the handiest vehicles ever made and besides they fit me. In today's world and since I no longer live on the ranch, no way I can justify owning one. Especially a diesel pickup.

My brother is in the same boat as you. He has to have a pickup for work and in his words "it tries to pull into every gas station it passes".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
29. rofl...
good,

Maybe the value of my 99' S-10 will go up a little and I can upgrade to a newer model :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
42. HAHA I told you so you fuckers!!!! Now eat it!
As a recently repurposed car salesman I told hundreds of people not to get a truck/suv unless they absolutely needed one for work... Now look at you! HAHAHAHAHAHAHA EAT IT YOU WASTEFUL BASTARDS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
43. Same rush to buy small cars happened in the 70's, remember?
Back then, folks were really resistant to buying foreign made cars.
Well, except for us hippie types who loved the VW bug and vans.
Datsun was coming on, great car, great mileage for its time.

And then a few years later, gas prices went down, folks started getting macho again and Detroit was pushing big hunks of metal as if nothing had happened.
Most folks went back to bigger cars and vans.

Odds are against gas prices going down again, ever.

Since 1970, I am on my 3rd small 5 speed car.

Now we are looking at people movers like this:



plenty of other ideas on this link, btw..






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #43
52. now that is neat.
I would use it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #43
54. that's some little vehicle there
Edited on Tue May-06-08 12:46 PM by Duppers
http://myersmotors.com/

I have a Forsen electric scooter, btw.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #43
64. I've owned nothing but Japanese cars.
On my third one since 1976.

With automatic, since clutches wear out real fast in the big city stop-and-go traffic.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XOKCowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
48. I had to buy a 2000 Dodge Stratus last year...
I'd just quit my job and needed reliable transportation to work freelance. I paid cash for it and it was really all I could afford at the time. It's got a little 4 banger that runs like a top.

Right now I'm damn glad I bought it. It gets a little over 35 mpg on the interstates and a little under 30 mpg in town. When I bought it I was a little disappointed but now my little Stratus is lookin' better and better all the time. AAMOF I think I'll go out and wax it. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
59. when fuel cell/battery technology becomes more developed, the SUV will be back just as big as ever-
the platform is great for the space needed for carrying the energy source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
63. Gee, I so didn't envision this back in 1998 - I never saw it coming?
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XOKCowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #63
66. Neither did Ford or Chevy or Dodge...
No sarcasm there. Just amazement at their hubris now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 03:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC