Pass EFCA, stronger legislation punishing employers who bust unions and get a secretary of labor who believe in labor (John Edwards would make a great secretary of labor).
If you do that then not only will workers start fighting for better wages, treatment and healthcare but a strong union movement will ensure long term democrat victories which will make it easier to fight for progressive agendas.
http://www.tompaine.com/articles/2007/05/10/labor_law_reform_not_just_for_unions.phpBusiness leaders argue that employees’ anti-union attitudes account for the decline in union membership, which was 12 percent last year after peaking at 35 percent in the 1950s. In fact, a December 2006 poll found that 58 percent of non-managerial workers would join a union if they could. But they won't vote for a union, much less participate openly in an organizing drive, if they fear losing their jobs for doing so.
Organized labor still has a significant capacity to marshal resources—both money and members—to influence the outcome of elections. Union members are more likely to vote, more likely to vote for Democrats, and more likely to volunteer for campaigns than people with similar demographic and job characteristics who are not unionized. In the November 2004 presidential election, union members represented 12 percent of all workers but union households represented 24 percent of all voters. Despite John Kerry’s tepid campaign and upper-crust demeanor, union members gave him 61 percent of their votes over George W. Bush. In the battleground states, where unions focused their turnout efforts, they did even better. In Ohio, for example, union members favored Kerry by a 67 to 31 percent margin.
When voters' loyalties were divided between their economic interests and other concerns, however, union membership was a crucial determinant of their votes. For example, gun owners favored Bush by a 63 to 36 percent margin, but union members who own guns supported Kerry 55 percent to 43 percent, according to an AFL-CIO survey. Bush carried all weekly church-goers by a 61 to 39 percent margin, but Kerry won among union members who attend church weekly by a 55 to 43 percent split.
Among white males, a group that Democrats have had difficulty attracting in recent Presidential elections, Bush won by a 62 to 37 percent margin. But again, Kerry carried white males who were union members by a 59 to 38 percent difference. Bush won among white women by 55 to 44 percent but Kerry won white women union members by 67 percent to 32 percent.
Had union membership reached even 15 percent of the workforce, Kerry would have won by a significant margin.
I've read if the EFCA were passed there'd be a million new union workers each year for at least a decade. So union membership would go from 12% to about 20%+ of the workforce.
When that happens the dems will have long term majorities that'll let them work on all these other issues. But rebuilding the union movement is a major priority. I've read unions are going to put $400 million into this election cycle, plus alot of footwork and canvassing volunteers. Imagine the power if all the people who wanted to join unions were allowed to.