|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
ThomWV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 03:18 PM Original message |
Guessing on who the next VP will be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BOSSHOG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 03:20 PM Response to Original message |
1. I am a big fan of Senator Webb |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madinmaryland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 03:22 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. See my post below.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BOSSHOG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 03:27 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. NO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madinmaryland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 03:29 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Tony Romo won't be available for a few more years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BOSSHOG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 03:31 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Now I understand where your name comes from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madinmaryland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 03:34 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. You know, I think they'll be using Marion Barber to wear down the "D" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ayeshahaqqiqa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 03:22 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Agree with you, Boss, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 03:26 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. General Clark would be a superb running mate or Defense Secretary, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 03:32 PM Response to Reply #6 |
14. Clark can't be the Def Sec without special permission from Congress. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wmbrew0206 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 03:26 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. I'm OK with Richardson but he has got to shave the beard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 03:28 PM Response to Reply #1 |
10. For a long time he was my guess as well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yavapai (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 04:00 PM Response to Reply #1 |
19. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madinmaryland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
2. Maybe, but I would be concerned about the loss in the Senate of two |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ninga (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
5. I do not think the VP will be a senator. A governor is a stronger bet and brings more of a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 03:28 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Strickland from Ohio or Ed Rendell from Pennsylvania would be great, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 03:28 PM Response to Original message |
11. what is this nonsense about obama's "top secret search" for a vp (something I saw |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wmbrew0206 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 03:51 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. This is Obama's nice way of saying.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ceile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 03:37 PM Response to Original message |
16. Richardson n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wmbrew0206 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 03:54 PM Response to Original message |
18. If we are going to go with a National Security Figure, make it Tony Zinni |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 13th 2024, 09:38 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC