Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

JUSTICE DEPARTMENT UNDERCUTS PARK SYSTEM FOR MOJAVE CROSS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
nosmokes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 04:16 PM
Original message
JUSTICE DEPARTMENT UNDERCUTS PARK SYSTEM FOR MOJAVE CROSS
Why is it so hard for some folks to grasp the concept of *public* land?
--###--

original-peer

JUSTICE DEPARTMENT UNDERCUTS PARK SYSTEM FOR MOJAVE CROSS

Administration Argues Park Service Lacks Authority on Private Land within System

Washington, DC — In its latest effort to stop court-ordered removal of an-eight foot cross from the middle of the Mojave National Preserve, the U.S. Justice Department is arguing that the National Park Service has no “authority to manage private land” within the park system, according to court filings released today by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER). If upheld, Justice’s position would strip the Park Service of the power to manage an estimated five million acres – about the size of New Jersey – of non-federal lands embedded within the 84 million-acre National Park System.

The legal fight over removal of the Mojave Cross has spanned the tenure of Bush administration. To many, it is the quintessential example of the Bush Justice Department going to extremes to defend display of Christian symbols on federal lands. The case has had many twists and turns, but the courts consistently ruled that the Cross violated First Amendment guarantees against government establishment of religion.

In 2003, the Bush administration supported a scheme to exchange the one federal acre with the Mojave Cross into private hands, within the boundaries of the Mojave National Preserve, California. In September 2007, a unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Court upheld a district court ruling that the land exchange was “a sham” and a transparent “attempt by the government to evade the permanent injunction enjoining the display of the Latin cross” on federal land.

In response, the Justice Department petitioned the Ninth Circuit for a rehearing on November 20, 2007, arguing, among other things, that the National Park Service lacks authority over lands within national parks that are not federally owned. The petition contends that the Organic Act of 1916 limits Park Service oversight to federal lands and does “not purport to give the Park Service” authority over private lands.

The 84 million-acre national park system contains at least 5 million acres of lands that are not federally owned, including private in-holdings, state and native corporation lands. If the Park Service were to lose management control of these lands it would significantly fragment the national park system.

“Ironically, the Justice Department is representing the Park Service by taking a legal stance that undermines its client’s mission,” stated PEER Board member Frank Buono, the former deputy superintendent of Mojave National Preserve who brought the suit to remove the Mojave Cross. “In its zeal to protect the Cross, and the constitutional questions that taint it, the Bush administration would cast aside decades of laws and precedents giving the Interior Secretary and National Park Service a degree of control over non-federal lands that lie within the boundaries of the national park system.” Buono is represented in the case by the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California.

The Mojave Cross is one of several instances in which the Bush administration has pushed Christian displays and creationist interpretations in national park facilities. This effort, which PEER has called “Faith-Based Parks,” appears limited to supporting fundamentalist Christians. For example, a request from another party to install a Buddhist stupa at the site of the Mojave Cross was rejected.

###

















complete release including links to related sources here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. I wonder whose "private hands" those are. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countryjake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Pretty sure it's the VFW or some other american legion group...
as it's supposedly some sort of "war memorial", blatantly ignoring those of other religions who died fighting for this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. I smell 10,000 "unregulated" Casinos.. all with a big cross on them
Edited on Fri May-23-08 04:29 PM by sam sarrha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. "Chill with the cross imperialism, dudes. Read your Bible." - Jeebus
'And if an altar thou dost make to Me, thou dost not build them of hewn work; when thy tool thou hast waved over it, then thou dost pollute it."

- The Holy Bible
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nosmokes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Hey! Put that tool back in your pants where it'll be less
conspicuous.:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Tell it to Jee ho Var
Edited on Fri May-23-08 07:16 PM by SpiralHawk
Graven image, the Bible declares:



If you choose to be devoted, be devoted to Spirit, not to an image of Spirit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. Mukasey's turn to carry the load
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC