Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ACLU: Abrupt Dismissal Of Judge Is More Evidence Of Military Commissions' Illegitimacy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 03:53 PM
Original message
ACLU: Abrupt Dismissal Of Judge Is More Evidence Of Military Commissions' Illegitimacy
Abrupt Dismissal Of Judge Is More Evidence Of Military Commissions' Illegitimacy (5/30/2008)


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: (212) 549-2666; media@aclu.org

NEW YORK - Providing more evidence of the illegitimacy of the Bush administration's fundamentally flawed military commission system, the Pentagon abruptly dismissed judge Army Col. Peter Brownback without explanation late yesterday from the case of Omar Khadr, a Canadian detainee. According to Khadr's lawyer, Navy Lt. Cmdr. William Kuebler, the timing of the judge's removal was suspicious because Brownback had recently threatened to suspend the case if prosecutors refused to hand over important records about Khadr's confinement to the defense lawyers. Just last week, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that the legal system under which Khadr was detained and prosecuted at Guantánamo violated international law.

The following can be attributed to Jamil Dakwar, Director of the American Civil Liberties Union Human Rights Program:

"While this decision is not surprising, it once again demonstrates the inherent flaws in a system that lacks impartiality and is subject to political influence. The message of the Pentagon's decision seems to be that it is unwilling to let judges exercise independence if it means a ruling against the government. This decision comes just days before arraignments in the cases of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four other detainees which their military defense lawyers have already charged were timed based on political considerations. American justice will be better served if these military commissions are abandoned altogether, and Guantánamo detainees are prosecuted in a real court - be it a federal criminal court or a traditional military court."

The ACLU, in partnership with the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL), has offered to represent Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and the four other detainees who are scheduled to be arraigned on June 5, as part of the John Adams Project, which has been created to provide legal teams to represent Guantánamo detainees.

For more information on the ACLU and NACDL's John Adams Project, see: www.aclu.org



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. The arrogance of the military
in this country is breathtaking. They've always been dangerous, but, under this so-called "administration," they've achieved new and higher levels of assholeness.

Dwight Eisenhower was right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Canada's Supreme Court rule Gitmo is illegal


Canadian Supreme Court Rules Guantánamo Detention And Prosecution Of Prisoner Violated U.S. And International Law May 23, 2008




, DC - May 23 - The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) ruled today that Canadian officials violated the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms – analogous to the U.S. Bill of Rights – by turning over interrogation records of Canadian citizen Omar Khadr to the United States. The court reached this result after finding that, at the time Canadian officials interrogated him, Khadr was being detained and prosecuted at Guantánamo in violation of U.S. and international law.

Khadr was 15 when he was shot and captured by U.S. forces in Afghanistan in July 2002. The SCC, citing decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court, wrote that "the conditions under which Mr. Khadr was held and was liable for prosecution were illegal under both U.S. and international law at the time Canadian officials interviewed Mr. Khadr and gave information to U.S. authorities,” and it ordered Canadian officials to turn over the records of Khadr’s interrogations to his defense lawyers.

The following can be attributed to Jameel Jaffer, Director of the ACLU National Security Project:

“Today’s decision by the highest court of Canada makes a clear statement that the legal system under which Omar Khadr was detained and charged was fundamentally unlawful>>>>

snip

http://www.commondreams.org/news2008/0523-10.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC