Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Petraeus wants "wartime" control over funds appropriated for Pakistan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 07:22 PM
Original message
Petraeus wants "wartime" control over funds appropriated for Pakistan
Edited on Fri May-01-09 07:35 PM by bigtree
The Obama administration wanted Congress to give wartime authorities to US military commanders dealing with Pakistan, US officials told a congressional panel.

Under the new proposal, the US Central Command will have the same unfettered authority in its dealings with Pakistan as it enjoys in the combat zones of Iraq and Afghanistan.

The Centcom will also have complete control over US military assistance for Pakistan and will not have to consult other US departments or agencies before disbursing those funds.

The Pentagon is seeking $400 million this year for the new Pakistan Counterinsurgency Capability Fund, with an additional $700 million for 2010. Overall, the administration is seeking as much as $3 billion over the next five years in funding for the Pakistani military.

Under the proposal, Centcom chief Gen David Petraeus will control the military funds earmarked for Pakistan.

Traditionally such military aid flows through the State Department and is subject to Foreign Assistance Act restrictions. "We question the appropriateness of providing foreign assistance for Pakistan under the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense" Sen. Daniel K. Inouye (D-Hawaii), the committee chairman, said in an opening statement.

article: http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-content-library/dawn/news/world/12-pentagon-seeks-wartime-powers-for-dealing-with-pakistan--bi11



" We question the appropriateness of providing foreign assistance for Pakistan under the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense"
SOURCE: The Washington Post 21 hours ago
http://feeds.washingtonpost.com/~r/wp-dyn/rss/politics/congress/index_xml/~3/PDhay57gVfw/AR2009043004067.html

" The responsibility for training Pakistani police and military forces resides with the Department of State, which ensures it complies with our overall foreign policy"
SOURCE: The Washington Post 21 hours ago
http://feeds.washingtonpost.com/~r/wp-dyn/rss/politics/congress/index_xml/~3/PDhay57gVfw/AR2009043004067.html

2. " We're walking a pretty fine line here. This is not a war zone for the U.S. military. But given the urgency of the situation, we need similar authorities in order to help Pakistan train and equip its troops for counterinsurgency operations ASAP"
SOURCE: The Washington Post 21 hours ago
http://feeds.washingtonpost.com/~r/wp-dyn/rss/politics/congress/index_xml/~3/PDhay57gVfw/AR2009043004067.html

3. " this unique authority for the unique and urgent circumstances we face in Pakistan -- for dealing with a challenge that simultaneously requires wartime and peacetime capabilities"
Robert Gates SOURCE: The Washington Post 21 hours ago
http://feeds.washingtonpost.com/~r/wp-dyn/rss/politics/congress/index_xml/~3/PDhay57gVfw/AR2009043004067.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. THIS war will be 100% owned by Mr. Obama - has any prez ever supported 3 wars at one time? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. About the closest thing was FDR who ran a world wide war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. If he wasn't in charge of the billions in cash that went to Iraq,
then I can't blame him. He wants his fair share next time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soryang Donating Member (642 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why even have a Congress?
Our Generals can decide everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 04:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC