Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Whitehouse.gov Backs Down on Repeal of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 08:54 PM
Original message
Whitehouse.gov Backs Down on Repeal of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell
Edited on Fri May-01-09 08:55 PM by Political Heretic

Title says Whitehouse.GOV backs down, not White House backs down - hold your fire until you read, please for the love of god.




A subtle but substantive change in the president's position on "don't ask don't tell" was noticed today by our watchful eye-on-the-administration tool, ChangeTracker <1>. An edit to the civil rights issues page <2> tells the tale.

http://versionista.com/pub/15881/1/12/7:6/

Previously, the message was clear. As of two days ago, whitehouse.gov said, "We need to repeal the 'don't ask, don't tell' policy." The new version of the page says that the president "supports changing Don't Ask Don't Tell in a sensible way that strengthens our armed forces and our national security."

In January, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs was asked, "Is the new administration going to get rid of the 'don't ask don't tell' policy?" Gibbs proudly gave a one-word answer <3>, "Yes.”

In March, Defense Secretary Robert Gates seemed to back away from that stance <4>. When asked by Fox News about "don't ask don't tell," he said, "I feel like we've got a lot on our plates right now."

The latest changes on whitehouse.gov seem to further that hedge -- and make it the White House position.

We've called the White House for their comment and will update you on their response.

http://www.propublica.org/article/whitehouse.gov-backs-down-on-repeal-of-dont-ask-dont-tell-501#10387


Also, if you're not familiar with the Change tracker, its pretty handy:

And, if you're wondering what the heck ChangeTracker is, well, it's a handy tool we’ve built <5> to track changes on administration Web sites. You can also get ChangeTracker updates via daily e-mail <1>, or RSS <6>. You can also build your own tracker <5> to keep an eye on any Web site you like. It's easy <5>.

Please, please, please try not to post some knee-jerk flame response. It's not a "hit" piece. I have no idea if this change means anything at all. It might not mean any change in administration policy on this issue at all. But it is a change. A question for discussion is, "why did this change get made?" The very fact that someone went to the effort to change it is interesting to me. I don't know what it means, but its information that I for one like to follow.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. words, just words n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Okay. Maybe. Then why change them?
Edited on Fri May-01-09 09:40 PM by Political Heretic
Someone had to make the conscious effort to change the words.

Seems at least strange...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. I can't edit my headline now but I wanted to mention Whitehouse.gov reinserted the language
After this story came out that people were tracking the strange change of language, the specific statement that Obama supports repealing Don't Ask Don't Tell returned to the website!

Well done. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. You're late to the party, dude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. no, "dude" - but I try to keep threads I post accurate.
That would include posting updated information to it when necessary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC