Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Red State: The gov't must not provide public access to the Web; Gov't stifles innovation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:43 PM
Original message
Red State: The gov't must not provide public access to the Web; Gov't stifles innovation
God bless the Red State. Without them, I might think myself crazy. By comparison, I cannot be.

The Obama Way: Nationalizing The Internet
Posted by Pejman Yousefzadeh ( Profile )
Sunday, May 3rd at 4:48AM EDT


Meet Susan Crawford, the co-chair for the Federal Communications Commission transition team for Barack Obama, and special assistant to the President in the Obama Administration (she has a blog here). A former law professor at the University of Michigan – one presumes that she has either departed permanently, or is on leave – Professor Crawford has some interesting ideas concerning the Internet. Namely, she wants it treated like a public utility:

Crawford stressed that the stimulus money is a down payment on future government investments in the Internet. “We should do a better job as a nation of making sure fast, affordable broadband is as ubiquitous as electricity, water, snail mail or any other public utility,” she said.


Of course, the use of the term “public utility” denotes nationalization.

{...}

DARPA may have created the Internet, but let’s remember that the Internet was able to thrive, grow and prosper thanks to more innovations in the private sector than one can shake a stick at. This should come as no surprise; capitalism’s and the free market’s ability to spur innovation concerning the growth and development of a particular commodity by providing financial rewards to those who do the best job of driving innovation has been well known for ages. By contrast, when it comes to government’s ability to spur growth and innovation, well, let’s let Crawford’s comment from the post linked above speak for itself:

It’s not clear that our government would even be particularly good at making fast internet access into a true public priority and resource.


I presume that this is Crawfordese for “Government would make a hash of the effort to make fast internet access into a true public priority and resource.” Despite her giveaway doubts, Crawford tells us that nationalization is necessary because a lot of services have now “become part of an enormous digital pond,” but be that as it may, government’s serial inability to drive innovation as well as the private sector does–an inability Crawford herself is forced to confess worry about–should rightfully put the kibosh on any nationalization effort.

Here’s hoping that it does. The Internet is far too important to leave in the hands of politicians and bureaucrats. I’d be remiss if I didn’t say, however, that given the Obama Administration’s nationalization fetish, I am deeply concerned that the Internet will indeed become yet another plaything for Washington to amuse itself with, and ultimately break.


Note the technique: first Mr Yousefzadeh assures is that when Democratic officials say they want to expand internet access, they automatically mean they plan to nationalize it, then goes on to denounce all the inefficiencies that would come with a nationalized utility. Nevermind that no one is talking about the government taking over the internet. In fact, as proof of how bad will be this coming Big Brotherization of the internet ("They're coming to confiscate our keyboards! You can have my mouse when you pry it from my cold dead fingers!") Yousefzadeh quotes the same Obama administration official who "wants" the Web nationalized as saying the government would "make a hash of it."

I honestly feel bad for the wingnuts. You can just feel it in their rants and postings how badly they want to oppose something if only the world would give them something sufficiently evil to fight against. Go home, guys, relax. Pop your well worn VHS copy of "Red Dawn" into your player and enjoy a good beat off. I'm sure eventually the United States will have use for your anti-government hysteria again someday. But right now the grown ups are busy cleaning up your last mess. At least get out of the way of our vacuuming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. internet should be a public utility - control taken out of the hands of corporate thieves nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. They have a real misunderstanding of the role of the private sector in development of the internet.
Edited on Sun May-03-09 08:34 PM by LeftyMom
Here, I'll correct part of their piece to get them started.


DARPA may have created the Internet, but let’s remember that the Internet was able to thrive, grow and prosper thanks to people's insatiable appetite for pornography. This should come as no surprise; capitalism’s and the free market’s ability to spur innovation concerning the growth and development of a particular organ by providing badly 'shopped .jpgs and later streaming video of nekkid people to every possible market niche and obscure fetish community has been well known for ages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. This guy is a moron or a propagandist.
"Public utility" means "regulated limited-profit public-service entity", not "nationalized".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. If it weren't for government, there would BE no internet
I can't think of ONE example where government "stifled creativity".

Government provided the infrastructure of research and development - from there the entrepreneurs took over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC