God bless the Red State. Without them, I might think myself crazy. By comparison, I cannot be.
The Obama Way: Nationalizing The Internet
Posted by Pejman Yousefzadeh ( Profile )
Sunday, May 3rd at 4:48AM EDT Meet Susan Crawford, the co-chair for the Federal Communications Commission transition team for Barack Obama, and special assistant to the President in the Obama Administration (she has a blog here). A former law professor at the University of Michigan – one presumes that she has either departed permanently, or is on leave – Professor Crawford has some interesting ideas concerning the Internet. Namely, she wants it treated like a public utility:
Crawford stressed that the stimulus money is a down payment on future government investments in the Internet. “We should do a better job as a nation of making sure fast, affordable broadband is as ubiquitous as electricity, water, snail mail or any other public utility,” she said.
Of course, the use of the term “public utility” denotes nationalization.
{...}
DARPA may have created the Internet, but let’s remember that the Internet was able to thrive, grow and prosper thanks to more innovations in the private sector than one can shake a stick at. This should come as no surprise; capitalism’s and the free market’s ability to spur innovation concerning the growth and development of a particular commodity by providing financial rewards to those who do the best job of driving innovation has been well known for ages. By contrast, when it comes to government’s ability to spur growth and innovation, well, let’s let Crawford’s comment from the post linked above speak for itself:
It’s not clear that our government would even be particularly good at making fast internet access into a true public priority and resource.
I presume that this is Crawfordese for “Government would make a hash of the effort to make fast internet access into a true public priority and resource.” Despite her giveaway doubts, Crawford tells us that nationalization is necessary because a lot of services have now “become part of an enormous digital pond,” but be that as it may, government’s serial inability to drive innovation as well as the private sector does–an inability Crawford herself is forced to confess worry about–should rightfully put the kibosh on any nationalization effort.
Here’s hoping that it does. The Internet is far too important to leave in the hands of politicians and bureaucrats. I’d be remiss if I didn’t say, however, that given the Obama Administration’s nationalization fetish, I am deeply concerned that the Internet will indeed become yet another plaything for Washington to amuse itself with, and ultimately break.
Note the technique: first Mr Yousefzadeh assures is that when Democratic officials say they want to expand internet access, they automatically mean they plan to nationalize it, then goes on to denounce all the inefficiencies that would come with a nationalized utility. Nevermind that
no one is talking about the government taking over the internet. In fact, as proof of how bad will be this coming Big Brotherization of the internet ("
They're coming to confiscate our keyboards! You can have my mouse when you pry it from my cold dead fingers!") Yousefzadeh quotes the same Obama administration official who "wants" the Web nationalized as saying the government would "make a hash of it."
I honestly feel bad for the wingnuts. You can just feel it in their rants and postings how badly they want to oppose
something if only the world would give them something sufficiently evil to fight against. Go home, guys, relax. Pop your well worn VHS copy of "Red Dawn" into your player and enjoy a good beat off. I'm sure eventually the United States will have use for your anti-government hysteria again someday. But right now the grown ups are busy cleaning up your last mess. At least get out of the way of our vacuuming.