Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NBC's 'Meet the Press' losing its Sunday talk ratings lead

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bravo Zulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 09:36 PM
Original message
NBC's 'Meet the Press' losing its Sunday talk ratings lead
"Face the Nation" had 2.83 million viewers for its April 20 show and "This Week" had 2.79 million.
Sure, the iconic "Meet the Press" maintains a lead with its 3.24 million that same week, but the gap is shrinking.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2009/05/meet-the-press.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. 2 word reason....david & gregory
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elwood P Dowd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. David Gregory.
The ratings will only get worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Lite weight
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
33. he's been a backup dancer for Karl Rove for way too long
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. These statistics sound about right to me. A strong argument could be
made that any of the Sunday morning news talk programs are beginning to lose their zip and their zap.

A lot of people might be thinking, "Well, hell. I'll just skip the Sunday news shows and work in the garden instead."

Or listen to some Emmylou Harris.

Or check out a local museum.

Or just about anything else at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwheeler31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. David is way too right wing, he asks the same
questions over and over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Pat Buchanan is wearing his skin. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. They should just put a camera in front of Tim Russert's headstone and let people talk to it.
We'd get better follow-up questions that D.J. Dancing David Gregory gives.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. David Gregory sucks worse than Tim Russert
and I didn't think that was possible.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SomeGuyInEagan Donating Member (872 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Agreed. I couldn't watch Russert *not* ask the obvious questions.
He was as big an enabler to the Bush fiasco as Limbaugh, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #11
34. Gregory takes the next step to ask leading questions with GoP Talking Points?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
9. David Gregory and his badgering of guests with incredibly stupid questions
I had enough before the election. I used to watch it religiously for many years. Not no more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
10. First The Newspapers, Next: Television Network News
Just a thought, a bad one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. I wouldn't call crap like MTP news
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. I Don't watch It Any More
gregory creeps me out, and you're right, it isn't news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. Tom Brokaw lobbied hard to get ass kisser Gregory that job
How;s that workin out for ya Tom?

And never forget this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYZre8kEsuw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
13. They've gotten so predictable and boring. The same people on over and over.
Lame questions with little or no challenging or follow up. Why watch?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
14. David "it's not our role" Gregory...
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/12/29/gregory/

"Several months before he was named as moderator of Meet the Press, David Gregory went on MSNBC to categorically reject Scott McClellan's accusations that the American media failed to scrutinize the Bush administration's pre-war claims. Gregory vigorously praised the job which he and his "journalistic" colleagues did in the run-up to the Iraq War -- the period which Salon's Gary Kamiya called "one of the greatest collapses in the history of the American media." Proclaimed Gregory, with a straight face: "Questions were asked. I think we pushed. I think we prodded. I think we challenged the President. Not only those of us in the White House Press Corps did that, but others in the media landscape did that." Most revealingly of all, Gregory said:

I think there are a lot of critics who think that . . . . if we did not stand up and say this is bogus, and you're a liar, and why are you doing this, that we didn't do our job. I respectfully disagree. It's not our role.

Indeed. Perish the thought that a reporter should point out when government officials are making "bogus" claims and are lying a country into a war. That is "not their role," says the New Tim Russert (and, unsurprisingly, the Old Tim Russert wholeheartedly agreed). I don't know whether Gregory's public advocacy for a meek and polite press corps that would never be so rude as to point out when government leaders are lying is what sealed the deal for his new promotion to Meet the Press -- a show which centrally depends on having powerful politicians know that they can come on and, as Dick Cheney's top communications aide put it, "control the message." But I'm quite sure that it didn't hurt."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. They were looking for someone to fill Tim Russert's tiny shoes
And NBC found their man in David Gregory. Russert, who famously said that his default setting whenever he picked up the phone was "off the record," was always good for a stroking and a happy ending to an establishment figure in trouble, and especially so when the party affiliation began with an "R".

David Gregory, who briefly flirted with being an actual journalist, soon learned the proper deference and way to get along with the power elite. The same old guests, the same old comfortable questions, and no follow-up or probing whatsoever. Guests know they'll get a nice ego massage and power stroke from David Gregory, not quite as good as Russert (yet), but he's learning week by week. The craven and the criminal know they have nothing to fear from David Gregory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatholicEdHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
15. Chuck Todd is bring groomed for the position
They may bump him up sooner than later if this continues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. I'm Still Waiting For KKKatie To Be Replaced
If CBS had any balls, they're replace her with Cenk (TYT), or Dan (Rather).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #15
26. Chuck Todd is about the same: terrible.
His questions as their WH correspondent have been laugh-out-loud bad.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #15
35. That would only make the ratings slide change to a full-on avalanche...
Chuckie is fucking TERRIBLE...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
18. I read a story long ago
that in order to get people on the Sunday shows, they give them the questions in advance for prep and approval. I didn't know if I believed it until I watched for several weeks with that in mind. It became obvious that almost all of the stuff was almost scripted. Not once in a year of watching did I get any real information from those shows - just talking points and pr.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
21. John Harwood would be much better
Edited on Mon May-04-09 11:09 PM by jaysunb
I've said that before, evidently NBC isn't listening. :shrug: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 06:27 AM
Response to Reply #21
27. I agree. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greybnk48 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
22. Ruin your Sunday morning watching right wing blowhards.
no thanks. Eight years + of that diet is enough for me. I gave up on Sunday morning tv all together, unless Ceasar's on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chollybocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
23. None of the above. About 7 years now.
My blood pressure went down 20 pts., while my IQ went up 20.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
givemebackmycountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
24. Can we have someone SMART?
Like,
Oh, I don't know.

How about...

Bill Moyers maybe?

That's right.
He's a dirty fucking liberal.

And he's doing the best work of his life on PBS every Friday night.

BUT, we couldn't have THAT could we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
25. Gregory sucks. They need to go back to an actual panel of
JOURNALISTS and stop having one right winger run the show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 06:38 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. Completely agree. Meet the PRESS. Like in the old days
It would make for much more interesting television. A constantly changing panel of actual journalists - NOT columnists and op-ed shills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
29. Good
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
30. David Gregory is boring and a shill. End of story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a kennedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
31. Gregory is just bad.....
:puke: :thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib2DaBone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
32. David Gregory Longs TO BE On Faux News....
....make his dream come true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC