CNN: Topless photo could cost Prejean pageant crown

and all we've seen on the intertubes is the least explicit photo. A person who has seen all six has said the others are more explicit and appear to have been taken post-augmentation.

She's lost her crown. Guaranteed.

I guess I'll have to use the Googler.

Yup, she's toast.

Sent to that deepest circle of Hell... Reserved for Hypocrites.

"Crown" winners lost their title because of nude pics that surfaced?

...I cannot think of her name, but I believe she actually won the Miss A contest and then lost her crown cuz nude Playboy pictures surfaced.

Edit to add: VANESSA WILLIAMS

The minute I hit the "post" botton, her name came to mind.

Link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanessa_L._Williams#Pageants_and_Miss_America_title

although honestly, i suspect pretty much all these beauty queens have pics like this out there somewhere. i mean, you know they have all been asked. and offered cash. and never met a camera they didn't like. just a matter of who gives people a reason to dig.

There have been a couple of others, but, they were more substance abuse related.

The irony in this is that not too long ago, the Right-Wingnuts were bashing Miley Cyrus's pictures and these pictures are every bit or more revealing than hers.

Nobody would have noticed his years of misconduct had he not disgraced himself with his post-9/11 comments.

If they included a moral turpitude clause, they're covered.

It says in her contract that she can't be photographed in a state of total or partial nudity.

According to NBC, Prejean's contract with the Miss USA pageant prohibits her from being photographed "in a state of partial or total nudity."
http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlLA/idiot_box/californias_prettiest_bigot_defends_nudie_pics_115746.asp

I seem to recall though that there was a Miss USA winner a few years ago that hade nude photos or a drug or alcohol problem or some such thing and Trump let her keep the crown. I remember both of them at a press conference where Trump said something like he made the decision because he thought she was sincerely sorry.

We all know she didn't put that statement together by herself.

She's such a wreck...

No way did she pose for kiddie porn.

I get a kind of religious feeling about them.

frankly, they looked just right for her frame
And much like the strawman,
"IF SHE ONLY HAD A BRAIN . . . "

I just can't fathom why they do this.

No way is it "cultural pressure" because lots of men hate the fake look.

More like lack of self-respect or just plain stupidity.

for her to have implants (and poorly done, at that). So this was basically a business decision, a marketing tool. There are women who choose to have implants for all sorts of personal reasons, some I agree with, some I don't. But for the pageant organization to provide augmenting surgery for it's contestants is absolutely mind-boggling. They offer to pay for this (major) surgery not out of the goodness of their hearts, but to benefit them/the organization.

The first time I saw a clip of Ms. California, the first thing I noticed were those unnatural bubble like things on her chest. Maybe they were done so recently that they look like that, I don't know. Implant surgery doesn't always have to look ridiculous, but in this case, I don't think they look good.

I just heard Keith Olbermann say that he agrees with Ms. Prejean in that the publication of her topless (without showing anything). This may be the first time I disagree with Mr. Olbermann, because NO ONE could publish any photos of Ms. Prejean unless she had chosen to pose for such pictures.

It's interesting that the Miss CA pageant may disqualify her for the photos (but not for something like "performance enhancing" surgery) is pretty goofy...

I can't believe pageant organizations promote such serious physical alterations by providing the funding for major surgery. Do they offer nose jobs, liposuction, etc., too? I guess it doesn't matter what one looks like upon entering a contest - they'll transform you surgically, turning you out to fit their cookie-cutter-Barbie-doll standards of size/shape/appearance. Blecch.

Heh Heh!!!

in Mysterious Ways". She's a freakin' tool with a boob job who spouts self righteous homilies when she's a hypocritical attention whore.

to superficially good looking people who have things too easy. Sooner or later life hands you some crow.

having shit handed to them. Fuck her.

is how I read the "breached her contract" by keeping the photos a secret.

Love the flexible definition of morality.

I don't see much difference between a Miss America contest and mild pornographic pictures. Her indignation is typical RW hypocrisy.

Sorry Miss Hypocrite, but your "sins" are no better than mine, so how about passing judgment on yourself for once!

She's just like Palin - neither won crap.

The State Title.

Sort of like winning, placing or showing in a horse race... damn, I really hate these stupid pagents.

Her Miss USA contract says she can't be photographed either semi or totally nude. I'd imagine her Miss CA contract probably has a similar clause. Wonder if they'll make her pay for those boobs now.

:rofl:

I'd say the pictures demonstrate pretty clearly her lack of integrity--i.e., her hypocrisy.

time to look up the actual definitions of the words in the speech. Sheesh!

She's already proven that she excels at reading lines without a teleprompter, so I think her future on Faux Snooze is guaranteed!

Elizabeth finally goes off the deep end.

...that is some air-head female.

JMHO

...it doesn't matter who made them public or why, the fact is, she posed for them and then she lied to the pageant committee about it.

You did it to yourself, sweetie.

"implied nudity" and "semi-nudity."

If her nipples aren't showing, that's "implied nudity," and she could honestly tell Miss USA organization that she didn't do "semi-nudity."

Unless there are more explicit photos than the one I saw, she was honest.

have heard all of that before, and construct the language accordingly. Trust me, this is not their first time down the catwalk.

...then that's different.

But banning "implied nudity" prior to the contest would mean banning a lot of potential contestants, and so I don't know if the Miss USA organization made the ban that broad.

"The contract contains a clause asking participants whether they have conducted themselves "in accordance with the highest ethical and moral standards" and if they've ever been photographed nude or partially nude."


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/05/carrie-prejean-topless-ph_n_196817.html

She is partially nude in that photo and I think the first article that I read about this said the other photos were definitely more revealing.

BUT ... since she's claiming she was only 17 when they were taken, that will surely curtail distribution of any more revealing photos.

What's really offensive is the big old HYPOCRITICAL part of her that's on display.

How about contestants that have worn a g-string bikini or shells over the nipples type bikinis?

They could at least come up with a real reason, rather than a smarmy pathetic excuse to smear someone who doesn't agree with their Chic Special Interest.

Oops! :)

mean spirited, hypocritical bitch.

they'd be calling her a slut, but most are defending her saying even christians make mistakes, or get semi-nude, etc.

I swear, they can not make a moral judgment without knowing who the person is and what their political views are first.

They start claiming they're a martyr for their religious beliefs.

I hope they finish with that Barbara Bush Memorial Tenth Circle in hell. They're going to need the room soon.

:evilgrin:

Donald Trump will allow it. Remember a few years ago when there were all these stories and pictures of Miss USA acting like a drunken piece of trash were leaked? He let her stay

I honestly don't get how a woman who wins a beauty contest in her swim suit then loses the title because she got pictures made showing how pretty her nipples are.

This news is breaking my irony meter.

You cannot hide from the nudity police.

Our nation is weird and creepy. They will find you.

"Prejean said the photos — taken when she was a teenage model — were being used in a “vicious and mean-spirited” effort to silence her for “defending traditional marriage.”"

Because denying homosexuals the right to marry isn't mean-spirited at all.

BTW - the Vanessa Williams pictures were way more explicit and included her going down on another woman.

.

...I think there has to be a difference between "nude" and "semi-nude," especially when the latter merely means panties and arms covering your breasts in a photo taken from behind. What Miss Fundie did is not much different from about half the photos in lingerie catalogs.

I think we should at least admit that the ban on "semi-nude" photos is pretty ridiculous, as virtually any swimsuit photo would, by definition be "semi-nude." And don't they have a swimsuit competition in the pageant? Otherwise, all we're doing is cheering for the regulations just because they happen to impact a wingnut. You can be sure that, if there was a pageant contestant who had spoken out in favor of gay marriage, a woman's right to choose, etc., and they were going to disqualify her based on a photo like this one (which is far different from the Vanessa Williams photos, with their full nudity and hint of S&M), we'd all be screaming "political persecution."

Has gone on to a better, or certainly more well known, career than virtually any other beauty contestant I can think of..

Vanessa has an excellent role on "Ugly Betty" and in my mind is a quite accomplished actress.

I suspect if she had been just another beauty contest winner she would never have gone as far as she has.

"There's no such thing as bad publicity".

ironic, I suppose.

The whole thing is just ridiculous!

They had no problem stripping Vanessa Williams of her crown..why not this pagent queen? Is she special or something....

Repugs believe the rules shouldn't apply to them...has nothing to do with her beliefs...she got caught.

:D

You can't show your boobs because that would be indiscreet or sinful even. But please, you're only a woman if you have enormous plastic bags filled with toxic fluid surgically rammed into your chest. The whole point of it iso that people will look at the big protrusions under your clothes.

It's a sex pageant. The idea behind it is to give people the opportunity to look at female physical beauty and either envy it or salivate over it. Only in America can the equivalent of two shoelaces holding two cotton swabs in place make the difference between appropriate and whoredom.

Typical American bullshit. It's all T&A but God forbid you've ever SHOWN any real T&A.

The fact that they even asked her a question about anything relevant to the real world mystifies me. It's a glorified dog show and they try to act like it's relevant to this day and age. How stupid. And people wonder why women are still struggling for equal rights here. Sheesh.

she screwed up. No matter what they ask, you're supposed to give an answer that basically says "I hope for world peace and long to work with children and animals some day." What's so hard about that? Somehow throughout history, these ladies gave the correct answer in many a trying time. Somehow, they always managed. Example Question/1973: "How do you feel about the war and should we be there?" "I believe someday we'll attain world-wide peace... oh, and did I mention I want to work with children and animals someday?" :D

The winner of the pageant has duties like traveling around the world hurling champagne bottles at new buildings, posing with minor dignitaries and entertaining troops. They can't have opinions. It lessens the marketability.

seem less like bimbos. Why can't they just be honest and let them be porn-lite. That's what it is. Straight out of the
1950's.

What surprises me most is that anyone still cares! Who watches this shit anyway?

Back in the early days of teevee it must have been amazing for men to sit in their living rooms and get to look at female bodies without being slammed for it. The hidden Playboy mags prob seemed more indicative of some perversion or mental defect. Women got some sort of envy thing satisfaction or something. Schadenfreude in who would lose, or maybe some indication of what their bodies should look like.

The only reason for it today is old tradition, since everyone else has moved on to their fav porn website. That and, the goils travel around hurling champagne bottles at new buildings.

;)

where is the smilie with the semi-frown?

that needs to be the standard snide response to baiting questions on Corporate Media news. or at least printed on a revealing bikini or tank top.

hey, if you can't ignore them, mock them.

she had an "opposite" pose in those photos anyway :P

After she said "tat" to Perez Hilton, I was thinking "Uh-oh. If there's some tit in her past, we're going to be seeing it soon".