Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Miss California USA honcho: Prejean may have violated contract by posing "partially nude" at 17

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 10:22 PM
Original message
Miss California USA honcho: Prejean may have violated contract by posing "partially nude" at 17
Carrie Prejean -- I Was Only 17!

Posted May 5th 2009 5:17PM by TMZ Staff



So someone sent us pictures two days ago of Carrie Prejean -- showing the Miss California/Miss USA runner-up modeling topless, partially covering her breasts with her hands and wearing panties. So, we ask, What would Jesus think?

We contacted Carrie's rep, who gave us this statement yesterday: "This was a photo that was taken several years ago, when Carrie first started modeling. In her naivete, an agent convinced her to pose for this photo to submit to a lingerie company, claiming they could make her the next Victoria's Secret model. She has since learned what a lie that was, and what a mistake it was to have the photo taken."

A short time later, we got a second statement: "Is there any allowance for the fact that she was a minor when the photo was taken, that would allow you not to post? She was only 17."

We had our doubts ... especially when comparing the photos to photos of Carrie at the Miss California Teen USA pageant in 2004, a few months before her 18th birthday. But we just got a handwritten statement from Carrie herself, and she's towing the line: "The photo in question was taken when I was a minor, several months before the 2005 pageant. The photo was not meant for disclosure to the general public."

A honcho at Miss California USA told us Carrie may have violated her contract, because she represented several times in writing that she never posed nude or partially nude for any photo. We're here to tell you ... that's not true.

We haven't posted the pics and won't unless we know she was over 18.

http://www.tmz.com/2009/05/05/carrie-prejean-i-was-only-17/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow - DUers really care a lot about this kinda shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Care? No. Amused? Yes.
One more:

Bored? You BETCHA.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pepperbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. yeah, but she is no longer Miss CA. She has become a polarizing political figure...
Edited on Tue May-05-09 11:05 PM by pepperbear
...solely for the purpose of furthering her own career, just like joe the plumber.

This woman is another anita bryant. Bryant had a heavy hand in turning back the clock on gay rights in this country. Is it really that much of a surprise that we can barely remember who actually did win Miss USA, but we all know who Carrie Prejean is?

I don't give a DAMN if she comes off like a barbie doll. she's a dangerous mouthpiece of the idealogical right. If she is going to exploit her "wholesome sexuality" to spread fear, lies and hatred, then, hell yeah! if at all possible, use her previous unwholesomeness to take her down.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Fascinating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pepperbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. oh , I get it. you're spock now.
Edited on Tue May-05-09 11:20 PM by pepperbear
:eyes:

right. you think you're cool enough to dismiss my statement with a chin rub.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. as much as I think she's a lunar tick, I think the idea that the picture will take her down
but not her other stuff just makes me shake my head.

for one thing, I don't get the whole beauty contestant/professional virgin thing anyhow. Why advertise virginity unless you intend to sell it? (line from a very old movie)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarah553807 Donating Member (329 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. Speaking of mss california
I think I have to go clean my toilet now.

goodnight everybody
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. but swimsuit competition is fine
Yeah, bikinis aren't partially nude or anything.

I wouldn't mind seeing the idiot stripped (you should pardon the term) of her 'title', but the standards are getting kinda blurry. Partially nude? Really? That's a deal breaker for pageants that encourage, if not demand, skimpy swim-wear that would never hold up to water? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. She's flashing the sign of the Devil in that pic!!!!!!1!!1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. *gasp*
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
david13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
11. Goddam. What would jezus think. He'd think damn, lemme see dem pickshurs. Oh,
17, and that's illegal. Hush my mouth. Thus sayeth jeezus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC