Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Keep cigarettes out of youth-rated movies?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 09:07 AM
Original message
Poll question: Keep cigarettes out of youth-rated movies?
Should a movie be rated R if and only if one of the characters smokes a cigarette?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. No.
Come on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I saw two NYC buses this morning with that slogan on them.
My gut instinct is it's a bad idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
3. I think Tom or Jerry smoked once or twice
My memory is cloudy but I think they did. To answer your quesion no. They are going to see someone smoke regardless of a movie. In a movie the smoking is fake, or atleast I think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Those should be rated R for their violence.
:o

(Not really.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suede1 Donating Member (770 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
5. Hell no!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
6. No. Thats just stupid.
It wont be long before the torch and pitchfork set lock all the smokers in underground jails anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowwood Donating Member (550 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
7. Paid Placements
Don't kid yourself. Cigarette smoking in films is not an innocent event. It's not a matter of retaining our "freedom." Corporations have been manipulating us for decades by paying the film industry to portray such stinky tobacco products as "glamorous." Many people have become addicted and have subsequently become less healthy because they succombed to this manipulation. Tobacco corporations have been some of the worst corporations to sell harmful products and to convince us that it was desirable. You probably already know that if a person is not hooked by the time he's twenty, he probably won't use tobacco, so he has to be enticed while he's young. It's a terrible product.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yes it is.
But you want a blanket rule to rate any movie at all with a cigarette in it R, even though violent films with no smoking at all in them would wind up with a PG or PG-13? This would mean no one under 17 would be permitted to watch most movies of the 1930s, 1940s, 1950s, 1960s, 1970s, etc., without a parent or guardian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surrealAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
9. Other. We should do away with movie ratings.
They don't really tell parents what they need to know about a movie's suitability for children anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
10. I have mixed feelings here. I hate the effect advertising has on our
lives and often movies end up being full of visual advertising. But it seems to me that censoring it will not stop it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
11. It's a rare movie indeed in which
nobody does anything of any sort that would be bad for children to emulate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
12. Sure. Then make promos targeting R-rated movies to kids.
Problem solved! :party:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lightningandsnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
13. Children and youth aren't idiots.
Most of them, beyond the age of 6 or so, actually have some critical thinking ability.

Plus, even younger than that, don't parents have the responsibility to talk to their children about these things? The state can't always take the place of a parent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
14. "The Life and Times of Franklin Delano Roosevelt"
Rated R, adults only!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
15. no, but make sure the smokers have smoker skin
wrinkly and disgusting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
16. People smoke. Young people know it already. Seeing it in a movie
will not surprise them. They will end up making their own decision re smoking.

BTW. I voted no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC