|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Orrex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:08 AM Original message |
CNN just ran the following caption: "RAGGING ON REPUBLICANS?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
itsrobert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:15 AM Response to Original message |
1. They are trying to say Wanda was "on the rag" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orrex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:18 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. I'm irked that the phrase was put on the screen without comment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:22 AM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Oh please, this is absurd. The term "ragging on" has been applied to both sexes and I guarantee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dem629 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:25 AM Response to Reply #5 |
10. But they put "SEXIST" in all caps, so they must have a really good point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
itsrobert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:25 AM Response to Reply #5 |
11. You really don't know how the corporate media plays these games |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JonLP24 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:20 AM Response to Original message |
3. Fuck CNN! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:20 AM Response to Original message |
4. to suggest that "ragging on" someone infers only a woman is so stupid, it numbs the mind. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catch22Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:52 AM Response to Reply #4 |
26. I figured I'd scan the replies before I wrote my own... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orrex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:54 AM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Way to join the party after it's over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catch22Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 02:33 PM Response to Reply #27 |
32. You're welcome |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:22 AM Response to Original message |
6. So, exposing repug corruption is "ragging" while Dems get (pseudo)serious investigations.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Supersedeas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:31 AM Response to Reply #6 |
17. according to CNN....Republicans are so vulnerable and misunderstood |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
realisticphish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:23 AM Response to Original message |
7. how is that misogynistic? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orrex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:26 AM Response to Reply #7 |
12. My understanding is that it derives from "on the rag" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
realisticphish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:36 AM Response to Reply #12 |
18. no, it doesn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dem629 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:39 AM Response to Reply #18 |
21. Yep. And it's origin is British ("R.A.G. weeks" - Raising And Giving) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dem629 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:24 AM Response to Original message |
8. It does if you're looking for something to complain about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orrex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:27 AM Response to Reply #8 |
13. Self-delete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dem629 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:30 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Slow day, huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orrex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:42 AM Response to Reply #15 |
24. Oops. Pardon me while I back off and slink away to hide my embarrassment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:25 AM Response to Original message |
9. Don't that just put the rag on the bush? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orrex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:31 AM Response to Reply #9 |
16. Post your source, and I'll recant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
realisticphish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:37 AM Response to Reply #16 |
19. see post #18 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orrex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:40 AM Response to Reply #19 |
22. Fair enough. See post #20 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
realisticphish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:41 AM Response to Reply #22 |
23. cool nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:57 AM Response to Reply #16 |
28. My 'source' is 65 years on the planet, but if you want a link, then here ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orrex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 10:04 AM Response to Reply #28 |
30. Yeah, that's actually the one the I found via teh Google |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalmuse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:27 AM Response to Original message |
14. My republican ex claims... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orrex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:37 AM Response to Original message |
20. Whoops! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JonLP24 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:43 AM Response to Reply #20 |
25. Either way the media has no sense of humor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 10:00 AM Response to Reply #20 |
29. Kewl. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 10:08 AM Response to Original message |
31. I've never heard the word "ragging" used in a sexist way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 14th 2024, 11:23 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC