|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-23-09 11:42 AM Original message |
What is it, exactly, that the Republicans want to investigate Nancy Pelosi for? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Patsy Stone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-23-09 11:44 AM Response to Original message |
1. Well, she *is* from San Francisco after all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-23-09 11:45 AM Response to Original message |
2. Investigation = guilt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kerrytravelers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-23-09 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
3. Having a D after her name. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-23-09 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
4. They want to prove she was told about WBing and had no problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-23-09 11:51 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. I get that but how do they expect to do it? It's a complete nonstarter. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Puzzler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-23-09 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
5. The more they investigate her, the more they implicate themselves... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-23-09 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
6. They want to investigate Pelosi because Hastert was House Speaker when it happened. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-23-09 11:52 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. and that means what? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-23-09 12:02 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. She wasn't Speaker of the House at the time last I knew. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geckosfeet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-23-09 11:51 AM Response to Original message |
8. For not having a tough guy demeanor. Hey - if you look like a woman, well, you know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalAndProud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-23-09 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
10. Failing to impeach Bush? Wait, that can't be the problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L0oniX (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-23-09 11:57 AM Response to Original message |
11. So uhm if she knew about torture and its wrong ...what about Bush, Cheney, Rummy, Rice etc? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-23-09 11:59 AM Response to Original message |
12. For a diversion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-23-09 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
13. For knowing about torture. But it isn't torture. And for not stopping them from committing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-23-09 12:11 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Here it is in a nutshell: "Torture GOOD! Pelosi BAD!!!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluedeminredstate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-23-09 12:22 PM Response to Original message |
16. They don't want to investigate her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-23-09 12:29 PM Response to Original message |
17. for if they don't loudly scream and point over at her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-23-09 12:33 PM Response to Original message |
18. Poor Nancy Pelosi. She was really caught in a catch 22 situation here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-23-09 12:37 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. There is no real requirement in law that one must stay silent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-23-09 12:44 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. I understand why she said nothing while the Bush administration was in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-23-09 01:47 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. Yes, I can understand given the surveillance state and the condition |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Diamonique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-23-09 12:51 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. She should have impeached the bastard anyway |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-23-09 01:02 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Yes, she should have but all those other crimes like the torture would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-23-09 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
22. For being briefed in secret about crimes they committed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 16th 2024, 12:29 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC