Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama: 'We are out of money now.'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 08:49 PM
Original message
Obama: 'We are out of money now.'

http://www.c-span.org/pdf/obamainterview.pdf

...

SCULLY: You know the numbers, $1.7 trillion debt, a national deficit of $11 trillion. At what point do we run out of money?

OBAMA: Well, we are out of money now. We are operating in deep deficits, not caused by any decisions we've made on health care so far. This is a consequence of the crisis that we've seen and in fact our failure to make some good decisions on health care over the last several decades.

So we've got a short-term problem, which is we had to spend a lot of money to salvage our financial system, we had to deal with the auto companies, a huge recession which drains tax revenue at the same time it's putting more pressure on governments to provide unemployment insurance or make sure that food stamps are available for people who have been laid off.

So we have a short-term problem and we also have a long-term problem. The short-term problem is dwarfed by the long-term problem. And the long-term problem is Medicaid and Medicare. If we don't reduce long-term health care inflation substantially, we can't get control of the deficit.


So, one option is just to do nothing. We say, well, it's too expensive for us to make some short-term investments in health care. We can't afford it. We've got this big deficit. Let's just keep the health care system that we've got now.

Along that trajectory, we will see health care cost as an overall share of our federal spending grow and grow and grow and grow until essentially it consumes everything...

SCULLY: When you see GM though as “Government Motors,” you're reaction?

OBAMA: Well, you know – look we are trying to help an auto industry that is going through a combination of bad decision making over many years and an unprecedented crisis or at least a crisis we haven't seen since the 1930's. And you know the economy is going to bounce back and we want to get out of the business of helping auto companies as quickly as we can. I have got more enough to do without that. In the same way that I want to get out of the business of helping banks, but we have to make some strategic decisions about strategic industries...

SCULLY: States like California in desperate financial situation, will you be forced to bail out the states?

OBAMA: No. I think that what you're seeing in states is that anytime you got a severe recession like this, as I said before, their demands on services are higher. So, they are sending more money out. At the same time, they're bringing less tax revenue in. And that's a painful adjustment, what we're going end up seeing is lot of states making very difficult choices there...


...



Looks like we still have alot of pain to endure...

Sidebar: Be on the watch next week for big news in the economy. The media will be wall-to-wall SCOTUS nominees and may use that as a distraction against major economic developments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Scully (the imbecile) obviously doesn't know the difference between a deficit and the debt.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. We have Billions the banks and war but none for health care for the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. What strikes me is that he doesn't mention that not only are we
out of money but the only major buyer of Treasury bonds is now our own Federal Reserve. And, they're doing it by printing more money. China has stopped nearly all its purchases of T-bills. And, there's a $162 Billion auction coming up next week and the possibility of a currency debasement, maybe the British Pound.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I read somewhere that China is buying up lots of gold. Seems like a circular
catch all---the Treasury selling to the Fed Reserve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Google News: China Brazil
Edited on Sat May-23-09 09:38 PM by Subdivisions
http://news.google.com/news?pz=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=China+Brazil

China and Brazil are working together to move away from the Dollar as their exchange currency.

Dollar chart:

http://quotes.ino.com/chart/?s=NYBOT_DX

Also, look out for GDP numbers coming out next week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. the best thing we can do is devalue the dollar
and make chinese imports to expensive to buy.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galileoreloaded Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. My parents (savers) and their meager quality of life would respectfully disagree n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
16. What do you call Medicare and Medicaid? The Part D drug plan?
What do you call the uncounted billions of tax deductions taken year after year to subsidize the provision of health care by businesses?

I call it more money than is spent on banks and wars. Current unfunded future liabilities for the items mentioned above exceeds $20 trillion. Add in Social Security and the number rises above $50 trillion. That is literally more wealth than has ever existed in the entire world.

I agree it's time to overhaul the system, but to say we have "none for the people" is the exact opposite of the truth. We are on the path to bankruptcy because of ongoing exponential increases in federal outlays for medical care, along with exploding outlays for Social Security. If current rates of acceleration in costs continue, Medicare/Medicaid alone will consume *every dollar* of the US budget within 30 years, unless something changes soon.

This, by the way, is exactly the rationale Obama is using to sell the overhaul.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #16
30. "unfunded future liabilities" = stupid accounting. tote up the "unfunded future liabilities" for
war.

Future money is *always* "more money than has every existed" because the money supply expands as population & production does.

If medical & retirement costs can't be funded though SS/Medicare, they can't be funded, period, & everyone needs to die. Is that your belief, that there is insufficient productive capacity to provide for the needs of the elderly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. It's called GAAP (or, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), and it is the opposite of "stupid"
Interestingly, by law, companies must use GAAP for their books...but not the US government.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GAAP

Meanwhile, whatever you meant by "future money" is irrelevant. Future liabilities, however, are not. Unless you think the Zimbabwean solution is a good idea.

We have no entitlements liabilities for future wars. We can simply choose not to fight them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr Rabble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. Here is the most important line in that exchange:
"and we want to get out of the business of helping auto companies as quickly as we can"

Notice that he specifically mentioned auto companies. The amount given to AIG dwarfs that given to all auto companies combined. And yet, he thinks it is most important that we not help the auto companies. Why is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Perhaps ...

... just perhaps, mind ...

He was answering the question he was asked about auto companies.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. "....a combination of bad decision making over many years...."
Edited on Sat May-23-09 09:20 PM by madrchsod
that`s why general motors was the largest seller of vehicles in the world until last year when Toyota sold a few hundred thousand more units. i guess it was a bad decision on the america public`s part to actually buy vehicles they wanted.

let`s not forget the government mandated "dealer reduction" disaster that forced the small to medium business owners out of business along with tens of thousands of well paying skilled jobs.

it`s fuck over the working class in america because who else are they going to vote for-the republicans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tibbiit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. I didnt read him saying we are out of money because of Iraq and Afghan Wars!
any mention of that in addition too the other things?
tib
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. shhh.... must not talk about those free billions/month given away to ...
Edited on Sat May-23-09 10:20 PM by Amonester
the military-industrial complex (at the expense of the lives and health condition of volunteering-service boys 'n girls).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. The total cost of the Iraq war to date is less than the stimulus bill.
You remember the stimulus bill, right? The one that had to be passed so quickly no had time to read it? The one that had to be passed, because if it wasn't, unemployment might hit 9% by the first of May?

The bill was passed. Unemployment hit just about 9% (8.9%) by the first of May. Oops, look over there, a puppy!

Only $30 billion of the bill has actually been spent so far on stimulus. Read Krugman if you want someone smarter than me to explain why that bill is an abomination.

Meanwhile, this year's deficit will be bigger than all of the deficits of the past eight years added together.

Read it yourself, if you want it from the horse's mouth:

http://www.fms.treas.gov/fr/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #9
20. Apparently that is money well spent. And the more spent, the better, for the MIC and
the War Profiteers. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AdHocSolver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
13. There is a "simple" solution to most of our fiscal and economic problems that no one talks about.
Bring the jobs that have been offshored to Asia back to the U.S. This will, in the long term, eliminate the trade deficit, reduce our foreign debt, refill the coffers of federal, state, and local governments when American workers pay taxes, improve the quality of the products and services we purchase, and remove our dependence on foreign governments to ensure our economic well-being.

The basic reason for most of our economic problems is the fact that most of what we buy is produced elsewhere.

An economy is a system in which goods, services, and money flow in an effective loop. Importing 80 percent or more of what we purchase means that one element in that loop flows out of the system and is permanently lost.

A metaphor that most people can understand is your car's cooling system. It consists of an engine that contains a water pump connected by hoses to a radiator. The pump causes the coolant (antifreeze) to flow from the engine where it absorbs heat, to the radiator where the wind cools it, and the cooled antifreeze is returned to the engine to absorb more heat. The antifreeze is equivalent to the money in the economy.

If the radiator hose breaks, the coolant leaks out (it stops circulating within the system), the engine overheats and seizes up and it stops running. Importing practically everything we buy means that the money that runs the economy (like the antifreeze) leaves the system and doesn't return to the "economic engine", and the economy stops working.

The stimulus money given to corporations, if it isn't mandated that the stimulus be used to put Americans back to work, will fail if most of it is used to buy foreign goods. It will just flow out of the country and increase our trade deficit and our debt.

No one is discussing this aspect of the problem because the corporations are making big profits exploiting cheap foreign labor and evading paying taxes in the U.S. To save the U.S. economy, these practices must stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #13
27. Oh well ...you'll end up fighting those 1800 corporations in the Cayman Islands...
and all the other countries will start crying fowl over free trade agreements and NAFTA. We don't want to close ranks and become known for our nationalism do we?

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #13
29. K & R this post. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
14. Who is out of money?
The taxpayers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
15. $180 billion to AIG alone, and he's blaming health care for the national debt?
Is this for real?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. Crazy, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThirdWorldJohn Donating Member (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 05:00 AM
Response to Original message
18. And Is Congress OK With The Fed not Being Able to Account for 9 TRILLION DOLLARS?
http://www.google.com/search?q=fed+loses+9+trillion&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

Doesn't Congress somehow have somewhat of an over site role with the FEDERAL RESERVE?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Optical.Catalyst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 05:05 AM
Response to Original message
19. We were out of money before President Obama took office
    The Bush Administration broke the bank with tax cuts to the wealthiest Americans while breaking the bank on an illegal war.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. And those tax cuts for the greediest among us are still intact. Why is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
23. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
24. But they still find enough to finance lost wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
25. Yes ...we know already. Banksters needs supersede those of the sick and elderly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
26. Get rid of GM management - and take away their undeserved parachutes and retirement bennies.
The workers are not to blame. Management calls the shots, which is why they say they deserve their salaries (which are 500x greater than that of their workers)...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. umm, that's already been done eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
28. Time to start economizing. How about cutting out a war or two?
Edited on Sun May-24-09 02:55 PM by Canuckistanian
Cut the wars, reduce the "black ops" budget and tell the Pentagon to get rid of half of their pet projects.

Oh, and let the Bush tax cuts expire and eliminate corporate loopholes.

Bingo! Solvency in 3 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC