Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton to Extend Benefits to Gay Partners

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 08:10 AM
Original message
Clinton to Extend Benefits to Gay Partners


Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton will soon announce that the partners of gay U.S. diplomats are eligible for many benefits currently denied them and allowed to spouses of heterosexual diplomats, according to lawmakers and others advocating the change.

The Bush administration had resisted efforts to treat same-sex partners the same as spouses. Thus those partners were denied a wide array of benefits, such as paid travel to and from overseas posts, shipments of household effects, visas and diplomatic passports, emergency travel to visit ill or injured partners, and evacuation in case of a security emergency or medical necessity.

Those benefits will be extended to all unmarried domestic partners -- both same-sex and heterosexual -- under the policy shift to be announced by Clinton in the coming days, according to a draft memo prepared for Clinton's signature. The draft was provided to The Washington Post by an official with the organization Gays and Lesbians in Foreign Affairs Agencies.

J. Michelle Schohn, president of the organization, said she had read media reports on the draft memo and was hopeful the changes would be implemented soon. "It would make great changes in the lives" of gay Foreign Service officers and be "a giant step for equality," she said.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/24/AR2009052402145_pf.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
snowdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. That was a good article. If you read the rest, it gives some history
of how this came about. She promised to look into the issue and carried through.

Good day for civil rights for the people involved and their families/friends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. yep, this is some 'change'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ismnotwasm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
4. It's a step forward
I suppose it sidestepped those disgusting court challenges to human rights ala "The protection of marriage act" or other such execrable legislation.

Washington State is doing something similar with the Domestic partnership law. It's a small victory, but not enough. It does do some great things, providing power to suffering partners shunned by families in the event of a loved partners death, sad things like that as well as increasing financial security.

I won't be content, neither ethically or politically until there are full human rights for Gays.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Neither will I be content with this piecemeal approach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
5. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. How cool is that? Baby step forward but still welcome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
8. It is an excellent high profile step forward. Good for Clinton!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. That's great!!
She promised that she would look into it and she did.

:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
t0dd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
10. Go Hilldawg! Now why can't she be for..
Edited on Mon May-25-09 11:42 PM by t0dd
full marriage equality? I've always been surprised she doesn't support it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC