Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nevada governor vetoes domestic partner bill: claims equal rights are subject to majority rule.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 06:38 PM
Original message
Nevada governor vetoes domestic partner bill: claims equal rights are subject to majority rule.
CARSON CITY — As he promised, Gov. Jim Gibbons today vetoed the bill to allow same- and opposite-sex couples to become legal domestic partners with almost all the rights and privileges of married couples.

In his veto message, Gibbons said he rejected Senate Bill 283 because it is contrary to the wishes of Nevada voters who in 2002 approved the Protection of Marriage constitutional amendment. That amendment stipulates a marriage may be between only a man and a woman.

Sen. David Parks, D-Las Vegas, the bill’s sponsor, now will try to muster enough votes in the Legislature to override the veto. The bill passed the Senate 12-9 and the Assembly 26-14, two votes short of the two-thirds needed to override a veto.

Under the bill, a couple would pay a fee to the secretary of state to secure a domestic partnership contract entitling them to make will, inheritance, health care, funeral and other decisions now made by spouses in marriages. But the bill specifies that a domestic partnership is not a marriage as defined by the Protection of Marriage amendment passed by more than two-thirds of voters in 2002.

http://www.lvrj.com/blogs/politics/Gibbons_vetoes_domestic_partners_bill.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'll be more than happy to apply the boot of "full faith and credit" to Nevada's neck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. One of my nephews is getting married in Las Vegas in August; maybe I'll
Edited on Mon May-25-09 06:42 PM by mnhtnbb
send the Governor an e-mail telling him that we won't be attending the wedding (one of my sons is gay)
because obviously they don't want to extend the same consideration to my son that they would extend to my nephew.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Can you imagine? Economically alone, what a boneheaded move.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. Don't fuck with Governor Gibbons, or he will rape you in a parking garage.
Some people say.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Certainly family values Gibbons wouldn't follow a young woman into a garage & molest her?
Say it isn't so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. Tyranny of the majority
If 'majority rule' was the law of the land, there would still be vast swaths of this country still subject to Jim Crow - where the minority would be disenfranchised of even the right to vote.

When minority views are ignored at the expense of the majority view, our system becomes a tyranny of the majority. The interests of the majority are placed so far above those of minorities that it may as well be a dictatorship. He's ignoring a tenet of law that's been around at least since Plato's Republic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. so with a 50%+1 vote we can outlaw the mormon church? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. --
No, that's religion. You know, something you choose, not something you're born.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. How about making magic underwear illegal?
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC