Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Washington Post asks if mercenaries should be remembered too.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 10:28 PM
Original message
Poll question: Washington Post asks if mercenaries should be remembered too.
Here is the argument.

What do you think?

Do mercenaries deserve recognition on Memorial Day?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Recognizing the contribution of mercenaries and privateers goes back to the Revolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I think we've evolved since those times.
In some ways, but not all.

I prefer to keep those types of "originalist" arguments to r0N pAuL.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I don't know what Ron Paul has to do with it.
During the Revolution, which we generally consider to be a noble cause, there were people who were not members of the military, many of whom had they been caught by the British would have been executed either for treason or as spies. The function isn't necessarily what these people contributed as much as what they put at risk. I don't see how we could consider it evolution to waive them all off, when we would not waive off those who risked less simply because they were in uniform at the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Really? r0N pAuL is notoriously stuck in an 18th century mindset.
He claims to be a Constitutional "originalist" and asserts that's where all his decisions come from.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Obviously you know more about Ron Paul than I do. But then I didn't bring him up.
And whatever he may or may not think has nothing to do with what I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Like I said above: "I prefer to keep those types of "originalist" arguments to r0N pAuL." n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmahaBlueDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. We'll remember them in 10 years when they come to Congress asking for Veterans benefits
I realize the whole idea behind the mercs are that you pay them a bunch of money today, and cut them out of the whole military benefits and VA down the road. Somehow, in the case of Iraq/Afghanistan, I suspect it won't work that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Bremer and his bosses (Yoo?) made mercenaries exempt from any of the laws.
If they swore to take the same oath as the grunts, then they can get benefits down the line.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Only if they pay me to remember them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. Fuck confederates. Fuck mercs. And the fuck confederates one more time.
Edited on Mon May-25-09 11:59 PM by BlooInBloo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
11. I think the Post and its owners, editors and writers should be remembered
Edited on Tue May-26-09 12:26 AM by depakid
for all the bodies that they maimed or buried.

Indeed- I wish on this day that each and every one of those at the Post who egged on Bush's war recieve in return 3 times the suffering that their actions brought on others.

J'accuse.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XOKCowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
12. Not all contractors are mercs.
Many were truck drivers and other service personnel who signed up to provide a better life for their families. Many got killed because KKR and Halliburton cared more about profit than their lives.

No I don't believe that mercs should be memorialized on this day. People who were just doing a job I have a lot more compassion for.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. "one who served merely for wages" are we qualified to make that call?
Aren't we the same people who claim that part of the injustice of DADT is that it denies an often critical or only opportunity to an entire segment of society?

Can anyone argue that military service, even in peacetime, had been a path to education and the middle class for traditionally underprivileged people?

We can't say that a given soldier enlisted for the noble cause, and we can't say that a given contractor is nothing more than a pirate in service to the Crown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Interesting point, but it's too late for me to adjust the poll.
Perhaps I should have said that mercenaries don't deserve the same consideration that military personnel do because they take no oath to uphold any laws. Nor would they have needed any reason to since Bremer and his bosses at the GOP gave them free reign to do whatever the hell they wanted by making them exempt from any law. These mercenaries operated with impunity.

Oh, BTW, I seriously doubt that the Fundy Christian Blackwater would hire any openly gay people for their crusade.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I wasn't aware that Blackwater was fundie or christian
But even if they are, I doubt that they make their hiring decisions on that basis. Give the character of those associated with them, I'm betting they would send their grandmother to Iraq if they could make a dollar off her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I think they would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigBluenoser Donating Member (289 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
17. Most "mercs" are former service members or feds...
Edited on Tue May-26-09 06:20 PM by BigBluenoser
So it is really the same people... just an error in timing when they get fragged that makes them a hero or zero. They should not be recognized as they are no longer under oath to the constitution (in other words they are not "loyal" to the USA in a direct manner).

Then again, the Merchant Marine WWII vets agitated for recognition for years (as a newish resident of the USA I am not sure if they got it here in the states or not.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I agree about taking the oath. Welcome to DU. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
19. What mercenaries?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
20. no. they are businessmen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC